AA77 FDR Data, Explained

[roundhead]

FEMA URBAN SEARCH & RESCUE: "The plane entered E ring at an angle and the force of the explosion punched through three of the five rings of the Pentagon. A nine foot diameter exit hole was created in the wall of C ring and the remainder of the debris from the impact ended up in the alley between C ring and B ring known as A & E Drive........is a photograph taken in A&E drive showing a 9 foot diameter "exit wound" where the plane debris exited the C ring. There were very few identifiable plane parts in the wreckage. Most of the plane disintegrated from the intense heat of the fireball. Other than some fire and smoke damage, there was a relatively small amount of damage in the A and B rings."
This quote can be found on Page 9 of the Shoring Report.

 

[Turbofan]

No you most certainly did NOT. Not even in the least bit. You pretending you did does not make it true, it simply means you are living in vast denial kiddo. your evidence also proved that the easter bunny was responsible and that Santa Clause helped in the diabolical caper.

Yes, I did. I proved the Anti's timing theory and FDR function wrong with
the following data:

YOU are the least technically inclined person here, so don't kid yourself.

Is that so? Funny stuff. If you're so technical, please tell me the min/man
propagation delay for the following table and timing diagram:

http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/pft_bit_timing.jpg
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/pft_bit_timing2.jpg

Source:
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/ARINC-429.pdf

Your failure to answer this will prove you are not technically inclined.

No, you simply found an article from a NAZI anti-semitic propaganda conspiracy web site that thinks it was an E4-B. My God, you really didn't think this through at all did you? There is no evidence of an E-4b other than absurd assumptions and speculation. Your criteria for evidence is why you get laughed at and aren't taken seriously.

Wrong again Jonny. I really wish you would pay attention. It's a CNN video,
and the E4-B has been identified. Watch again:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=h8mGvFzvwFM

Still nobody up for Post #1104 huh?

Anyone want to tell me how many bounces the landing gear took off the
columns?

Anybody? Somebody? Faceless people included!

 

[WildCat]

Still waiting for you to provide some pictures of whatever it is you pretend hit the Pentagon. Care to show us those missile parts? Funny how you don't require any evidence for your claims, only ones that you want to pretend don't exist.

Yes, I think we can state with 100% certainty there are no pictures of missile parts. Or E-4B parts, or a "smaller plane".

I'm still dying to hear Turbofan explain how a smaller plane could do the damage a 757 could not.

 

[D'rok]

This series of posts gave me the largest lurker-laugh I've had on this forum for a while. Thanks to all involved!

....the fact there is NO landing gear in ANY photos anywhere near the hole

Have you ever been right about anything roundhead?

[photo of landing gear near hole]

Oh, and let's not forget mangoose's post in the C-Ring thread: http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3557890#post3557890

What do you think of that roundhead? All planted, right? The firemen are in on it, right?

Face it, if the landing gear existed, there would be scores of photo's of it, and they would all support the official story.

The fact is, there are zero photo's, you lose.

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=3557890#post3557890

Not to mention there is ZERO evidence of the landing gear that supposedly made the hole. None, Zilch, zero.

You mean, except for all those pictures?

 

[HyJinX]

I am looking at the wheel hub, and the hole, and.....you lose

Hey Knucklehead...there's a whole crapload of debris that went through the hole...not JUST the landing gear. Why do you make such a fool out of yourself everyday here? It's so sad to watch.

 

[WildCat]

Hey Turbofan and roundhead, did you look at all those pictures showing airplane parts? Were those all planted there? Were the remains of the Flight 77 passengers also planted there? Are all the rescue workers (firemen, paramedics, police, etc) who responded from outlying towns in on it also?

Oh, and be sure to post those missile part pics. Maybe that tire and wheel was from a missile? And the FDR?

 

[roundhead]

From Pentagonresearch:

photo at the top of this page is the earliest photo of the exit hole that I've been able to find. No hose lines have been stretched by the fire department and nothing has been displaced. This photo was taken on the 11th probably by a firefighter doing an initial size-up on the building. The only place it has appeared officially is in the Arlington County After-Action report implying that its source is from emergency personnel.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

Yes, I did. I proved the Anti's timing theory and FDR function wrong with
the following data:





Is that so? Funny stuff. If you're so technical, please tell me the min/man
propagation delay for the following table and timing diagram:

http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/pft_bit_timing.jpg
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/pft_bit_timing2.jpg

Source:
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/ARINC-429.pdf

Your failure to answer this will prove you are not technically inclined.



Wrong again Jonny. I really wish you would pay attention. It's a CNN video,
and the E4-B has been identified. Watch again:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=h8mGvFzvwFM

Still nobody up for Post #1104 huh?

Anyone want to tell me how many bounces the landing gear took off the
columns?

Anybody? Somebody? Faceless people included!

No you didn't. Don't be an idiot. you proved that the rough animation did not match the events of that day. You did NOT prove that flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon. Let us repeat this for you since yu aren't too bright:

YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON

Is it getting to you yet? Are the neurons firing? Is there anyone behind the wheel?

Please, go take that evidence to the press and see what happens. File a lawsuit and see what happens. I mean you proved it right? So then kid, why aren't you taking action with that evidence?

And how many bounces the landing gear takes off the columns? Kid, stop taking drugs. When you are not high, come back and post here. Until then, it's just too ssad to even be funny. At least roundhead posts stuff that causes people to roll on the floor laughing. Your idiotic posts are just boring.

 

[Turbofan]

Yes, I think we can state with 100% certainty there are no pictures of missile parts. Or E-4B parts, or a "smaller plane".

I'm still dying to hear Turbofan explain how a smaller plane could do the damage a 757 could not.

I'm still waiting for all of you to answer my questions.

So until that is done, you will all get ignored.

Post #1104, two pages back already.

Show me your calculations to support the NTSB flight data.

 

[HyJinX]

From Pentagonresearch:

photo at the top of this page is the earliest photo of the exit hole that I've been able to find. No hose lines have been stretched by the fire department and nothing has been displaced. This photo was taken on the 11th probably by a firefighter doing an initial size-up on the building. The only place it has appeared officially is in the Arlington County After-Action report implying that its source is from emergency personnel.


http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/066-large.jpg

Thanks for debunking yourself.

 

[Jonnyclueless]

BTW turbo, I know you keep trying to hide from this issue but again, since you have "proven" flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon, why haven't you provided a statement from L3, your experts, stating they agree with your conclusions? You have proven it according to.....YOU... so what's the problem kid?

 

[WildCat]

Hmmm, it also occurs to me maybe roundhead is under the impression that we're saying that the landing gear, and the landing gear alone, went skipping off the columns and knocked the hole in the wall?

I can read this kid like a book!

I am looking at the wheel hub, and the hole, and.....you lose

And I'll let HyJinX get the last word...

Hey Knucklehead...there's a whole crapload of debris that went through the hole...not JUST the landing gear. Why do you make such a fool out of yourself everyday here? It's so sad to watch.

 

[HyJinX]

So until that is done, you will all get ignored.

Thank GOD! Though you'll probably lie about this too.

 

[roundhead]

Anybody notice the difference between the first known photo of the hole i posted...where none of the junk is "toasted or charred" laying around outside the hole....

And later photographs where the same stuff is????


Remember among the very first people to look at the hole said there were no identifible plane parts there..no revising history, just stating a fact.

 

[Turbofan]

No you didn't. Don't be an idiot. you proved that the rough animation did not match the events of that day. You did NOT prove that flight 77 didn't hit the Pentagon. Let us repeat this for you since yu aren't too bright:

YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON
YOU DID NOT PROVE THAT FLIGHT 77 DIDN'T HIT THE PENTAGON

Is it getting to you yet? Are the neurons firing? Is there anyone behind the wheel?

Please, go take that evidence to the press and see what happens. File a lawsuit and see what happens. I mean you proved it right? So then kid, why aren't you taking action with that evidence?

And how many bounces the landing gear takes off the columns? Kid, stop taking drugs. When you are not high, come back and post here. Until then, it's just too ssad to even be funny. At least roundhead posts stuff that causes people to roll on the floor laughing. Your idiotic posts are just boring.

The proof is right here Jonny CLUELESS:

http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/911_1.5_lightpoles.jpg

How do you get the plane low enough to hit the light poles at 273 ft AGL,
considering the speed, and g's?

Thanks for your technical ability to answer this finally

 

[WildCat]

I'm still waiting for all of you to answer my questions.

So until that is done, you will all get ignored.

Keep running like a scared little schoolgirl Turbofan! Explain how the airplane parts and passenger remains ended up inside the Pentagon. Was it planted when the office workers were there or when the firemen were there?

Post #1104, two pages back already.

Show me your calculations to support the NTSB flight data.

You must be mistaking me for someone else, I don't do the physics here.

 

[roundhead]

Q...Did the Pentagon building damage assesment team ever look at that hole in person

A.No


Seems strange to me they were tasked with studying the damage to the building, and werent allowed to look at a 9 foot hole in it...the second largest there was

 

[lapman]

Yes, I did. I proved the Anti's timing theory and FDR function wrong with
the following data:





Is that so? Funny stuff. If you're so technical, please tell me the min/man
propagation delay for the following table and timing diagram:

http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/pft_bit_timing.jpg
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/pft_bit_timing2.jpg

Source:
http://www.procision-auto.com/Tino/ARINC-429.pdf

Your failure to answer this will prove you are not technically inclined.

Wow, which data rate are you looking for? For the whole table, it's 0ns min - 840ns max. The fact that you have no clue that the diagram and the timing chart really have no correlation shows how technically inept you really are.

Wrong again Jonny. I really wish you would pay attention. It's a CNN video,
and the E4-B has been identified. Watch again:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=h8mGvFzvwFM

What time was that clip taken?

Still nobody up for Post #1104 huh?

Why? You won't accept the answers, so why bother?

Anyone want to tell me how many bounces the landing gear took off the
columns?

Do you want to tell us why they would create the hole if all they needed was the entry point?

 

[Grizzly Bear]

Have you ever been right about anything roundhead?

Nah he just blatantly doesn't care, truly worthy of a stundie moment. Any debris that proves his theory wrong must be planted there according to his logic. I love irony

 

[LashL]

From Pentagonresearch:

photo at the top of this page is the earliest photo of the exit hole that I've been able to find. No hose lines have been stretched by the fire department and nothing has been displaced. This photo was taken on the 11th probably by a firefighter doing an initial size-up on the building. The only place it has appeared officially is in the Arlington County After-Action report implying that its source is from emergency personnel.


http://www.pentagonresearch.com/images/066-large.jpg

I think that the above is incorrect. That photo appears to be an FBI photo that was taken after the firefighters had extinguished the bulk of the fire in that area.

The version you have posted appears to be a cropped version of a photo which appears in the book, "Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11" with accreditation, and the uncropped version shows standing water on the ground from the firefighting.

Remember among the very first people to look at the hole said there were no identifible plane parts there..no revising history, just stating a fact.

You should read the book mentioned above if you really want to know what the very first people to see the interior of the Pentagon have to say about it. There are numerous accounts from firefighters and other first responders in the book.