• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Split Thread AA77 FBI Investigation [split from: AA77 FDR Data, Explained]

Reported, off topic.

I would suggest you be very careful with your reporting. While of course, reporting inappropriate behavior etc...is expected, excessive use of the report function can be, in and of itself, a cause for a trip to suspension land. As well, given the frequency, and often void of content posts you produce, you might soon find that every second one of your posts is reported for the very reason you give above.

TAM:)
 
No, I have been doing years of reserach on a government secure intranet, and on the public internet. I can list the research sites used and research done but it would take a lot of pages, and some sites you could not get to becasue of being on a secure net.

I received 2 CDs from the NTSB.

I sent an FOIA requst to the NSA.

I sent e-mails to contractors that were at ground zero.

Thanks for showing that you overlooked or avioded the other information.
(bolding mine)

Naughty boy, Roger. The NSA is going to discipline you for using government resources for your personal use.

I hope your post above doesn't come to the attention of your supervisors, or you will be in trouble.

Of course you already knew this, didn't you?
 
So are you investigating 9/11 from work then?

or are you able to access these secure sites from home/library?
It really doesn't matter where he accesses the sites from. It's still a Fraud, Waste, and Abuse (FWA) issue, even if he's using a government resource on his own personal time.
 
Keep it civil please. Attack the argument, not the arguer.
Replying to this modbox in thread will be off topic  Posted By: Gaspode
 
SO, you are doing research at work then?

Then that means you have read the followup reports to the critic you have a FOIA request on, right?
 
Ahh....so you "say" you have access to them, but wont go read them? Why not, Roger?

Waiting form someone else to post them on the internet for you? Or perhaps you dont have clearance to read them, after all..
 
Ahh....so you "say" you have access to them, but wont go read them? Why not, Roger?

Waiting form someone else to post them on the internet for you? Or perhaps you dont have clearance to read them, after all..


Last time i post, please learn to read or have someone read it for you.

As i have stated many times i have not read them i am waiting for the declassified documents.
 
Last time i post, please learn to read or have someone read it for you.

As i have stated many times i have not read them i am waiting for the declassified documents.


YOU READ IT HERE FOLKS!!!

This was the last time he was going to post!

Any further posts means he was lying.
 
Last time i post, please learn to read or have someone read it for you.

As i have stated many times i have not read them i am waiting for the declassified documents.

I'm trying to imagine what the classified documents could possibly reveal that would change the basic story in any material way; 19 Islamists, whose names we more or less know hijacked 4 commercial jets who's tail numbers we know and crashed them into 4 buildings.

Bigfoot? Martians?

If anything, the classified stuff will add even more flesh to the basic story.

U1's own NSA monitored Islamist hijacker phone calls and some of that should certainly be kept secret but it doesn't change the basic story and makes the serial number of a wheel off of AA77 uninteresting for the purposes of discussion what was found in the fire in the Pentagon.

Maybe there were 20 or 100 Islamists. Maybe King Saud, himself approved of it and paid for it. That doesn't change the basic story. Maybe there was an aborted attempts on a 5th plane. That doesn't change the basic story. Maybe there is a back door to a plane that the public doesn't know about and should be kept secret. That doesn't change the basic story.
 
Last edited:
Ultima1 admitted on ATS last year that the jet that crashed into the Pentagon was AA77.

He's just wasting his time trying to deny it.
 
Only a very few can be accesed from home/library.

Wrong. Absolutely and completely wrong. If you are attempting to access a GENSER or above level system from anywhere BUT inside an approved area for the access of classified information, you are committing a federal offense.

Besides, SIPRNET and by extension, INTELINK, cannot be accessed from your home or your library. It's not possible, the connections aren't wired that way. What good would having a secure network be if it was networked to the NIPRNET at any point whatsoever? It goes into completely separate routers.

You've outed yourself yet again. Mods, I sincerely apologize for this, I really do. But I cannot let a claim like this stand without refuting it.

I'm ejecting from this thread most ricky-tick.
 
I'm trying to imagine what the classified documents could possibly reveal that would change the basic story in any material way; .

It could show that like most people with common sense and intelligence know that the official story is not correct.
 
Wrong. Absolutely and completely wrong. If you are attempting to access a GENSER or above level system from anywhere BUT inside an approved area for the access of classified information, you are committing a federal offense.


You are completly wrong and not very intelligent.

I did not say the sites were classified did i? There are a few unclassified sites that i acces from work and at home.

Would you like me to list them to show you?
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom