Marquis de Carabas
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Dec 5, 2002
- Messages
- 27,071
Creeping things obviously refers to snakes, lizards, and talk show hosts.Scot C. Trypal said:Not so fast:
Gen 7:13-14
Gen 7:21-22
Creeping things obviously refers to snakes, lizards, and talk show hosts.Scot C. Trypal said:Not so fast:
Gen 7:13-14
Gen 7:21-22
Marquis de Carabas said:Creeping things obviously refers to snakes, lizards, and talk show hosts.
Marquis de Carabas said:Creeping things obviously refers to snakes, lizards, and talk show hosts.
Scot C. Trypal said:Please, leave Oprah and Springer out of this.
Besides, insects are (arguably?) made of flesh and are part of “all that was in the dry landâ€, and in there "nostrils was the breath of life" (Do insects have "nostrils"?).
On the other hand, I can see your point is backed by a bit of science; an insect does weight less than a duck.
Insects weren't "in the dry land." Before the Flood, they lived in floating sky castles. It was in these very castles, incidentally, that God kept all the water before the Flood.Scot C. Trypal said:Please, leave Oprah and Springer out of this.
Besides, insects are (arguably?) made of flesh and are part of “all that was in the dry landâ€, and in there "nostrils was the breath of life" (Do insects have "nostrils"?).
bluess said:Does it therefore weigh less than a witch?
Scot C. Trypal said:And all flesh died that moved upon the earth, both of fowl, and of cattle, and of beast, and of every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth, and every man: All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.
Psiload said:Dry land is a myth.
Dust in the wind dude!bluess said:You weren't in Kansas in the '70s, obviously.
Upchurch said:I assume you mean "global" flood, not "universal"? A universal flood could not happen for several reasons that I can think of off the top of my head, but lack of that much water is one.
Aside from Marquis de Carabas's point about the Biblical dimensions not allowing room for two of every animal, there is also the consideration of fact of transportating animals from the great distances from parts of the planet that were, by all evidence, unknown to the people of Noah's time and location.
There is also the problem that a single male-female pair is insufficent for sustaining a species. Especially given that many animals are carnivors and the selection of prey would be limited to those animals in the Ark.
c4ts said:Also, did the bible say anything about Noah putting every species of plant on board? They too would have drowned in the flood.
bluess said:[Marquis de Carabas mode] No, the plants (roots and all) were encased in a miraculous substance which rendered this task unnecessary. Said substance dried up with the rain.
[/Marquis de Carbas mode]
Marquis de Carabas said:If e'er I find myself out of a job, I'm going to set myself up as a Flood apologist.
And the dove came in to him in the evening; and, lo, in her mouth [was] an olive leaf pluckt off: so Noah knew that the waters were abated from off the earth. Gen 8:11
Originally posted by bluess
[Marquis de Carabas mode] No, the plants (roots and all) were encased in a miraculous substance which rendered this task unnecessary. Said substance dried up with the rain.
[/Marquis de Carbas mode]
Odin said:SNIP...
Pity the animals all had to drown...
Does it therefore weigh less than a witch?
If... she... weighs... the same as a duck,... she's made of wood.
Ah, but only "almost." Now, can you prove there were no floating sky castles? Didn't think so. Score one for God! Whoohoo!Scot C. Trypal said:I’m glad some here aren’t completely ignorant of science, particularly regarding this topic.
Now, Marquis de Carabas, you are up in the night. Floating sky castles!? That’s clearly ridiculous and almost unworthy of debate.
bluess said:[Marquis de Carabas mode] No, the plants (roots and all) were encased in a miraculous substance which rendered this task unnecessary. Said substance dried up with the rain.
[/Marquis de Carbas mode]