Merged A Thread for AlexPontik to Explain his Ideas

I don't know you guys, if you really think I am wrong fair enough, but if you want me to reply to you you really need to try to come up with some real arguments,

and that involves real thinking...

I am aware how simple what I am telling you sounds, as well as that it could be wrong, exactly because of what I am saying to you, but I need someone to prove it wrong, up to now you are just giving me your opinion regarding how you would like the universe to be...

...the universe had to be before you were...
 
AlexPontik said:
An experiment can either yield results that agree with theoretical predictions, or results that do not.

...or something else can happen, that simply your theory forgot to "predict"
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material


no?
Click to expand...

No.

"Something else happening that the theory didn't predict" is included in "results that do not agree with theoretical predictions". It's not a separate case.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pixel42 said:
No.



"Something else happening that the theory didn't predict" is included in "results that do not agree with theoretical predictions". It's not a separate case.
Click to expand...
Yep. "Something happened which the theory didn't predict" is definitely a result which does not agree with the theory's predictions.
 
AlexPontik said:
An experiment can either yield results that agree with theoretical predictions, or results that do not.

...or something else can happen, that simply your theory forgot to "predict"
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material


no?
Click to expand...

No.

Dave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pixel42 said:
No.

"Something else happening that the theory didn't predict" is included in "results that do not agree with theoretical predictions". It's not a separate case.
Click to expand...

Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",

or did you forget that?
 
Jack by the hedge said:
Yep. "Something happened which the theory didn't predict" is definitely a result which does not agree with the theory's predictions.
Click to expand...

Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",

as reality really seems to be happening, since the beginning or reality, in a really funny way...

some get it...some don't...

do you get it
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Dave Rogers said:
We're still waiting for you to go first.

Dave
Click to expand...

When you imagine something, something else is happening around you in reality, or it doesn't seem to me where inside you imagine something.

If you don't understand...

while reading here...

since you woke up today...

how many times exactly did you blink?

Why do you have to know exactly?

Because you claim that you imagine stuff and they happen in reality so how many times EXACTLY did you blink today....or...

...did something else happen and you forgot about that, player?
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AlexPontik said:
When you imagine something, something else is happening around you in reality, or it doesn't seem to me where inside you imagine something.

If you don't understand...

while reading here...

since you woke up today...

how many times exactly did you blink?

Why do you have to know exactly?

Because you claim that you imagine stuff and they happen in reality so how many times EXACTLY did you blink today....or...

...did something else happen and you forgot about that
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material
Click to expand...

Still waiting.

Dave
 
Last edited by a moderator:
AlexPontik said:
Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",

or did you forget that?
Click to expand...

Regardless of whether that is a meaningful comment or not (and I'm going with not) it remains a fact that there are only two possible outcomes of an experiment testing whether or not a specific prediction is correct.
 
AlexPontik said:
Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",
Click to expand...

Oh Boy!

There is either something really, really, deep hidden in these words or it is just nonsense - I think the later.

You are saying it it is not possible for a theoretical prediction to be found as a reality? Where do you dig up these nonsensical utterances?

My theory is that this thread will end up in the "Abandon All Hope" location along with so many other threads you have created. Let's see if that turns into a reality.
 
If I perform an experiment, and Cthulhu appears out of the ether, I might live in a universe where those specific circumstances make Cthulhu appear out of the ether. Repeating the experiment would help determine whether the circumstances and Cthulhu's appearance are linked, but it's also possible that Cthulhu is just messing with me.
 
AlexPontik said:
Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",

as reality really seems to be happening, since the beginning or reality, in a really funny way...

some get it...some don't...

do you get it
Edited by Agatha: 
Removed reference to previously moderated material
Click to expand...
No, I don't get it. If I conduct an experiment to test a theory, why would you assume my theory contradicts reality? Do you just assume every experiment is actually testing a Theory of Everything?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Pixel42 said:
Regardless of whether that is a meaningful comment or not (and I'm going with not) it remains a fact that there are only two possible outcomes of an experiment testing whether or not a specific prediction is correct.
Click to expand...

Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",

or did you genius want others to follow your "theoretical predictions"?

Wake up...
 
Thor 2 said:
Oh Boy!

There is either something really, really, deep hidden in these words or it is just nonsense - I think the later.

You are saying it it is not possible for a theoretical prediction to be found as a reality? Where do you dig up these nonsensical utterances?

My theory is that this thread will end up in the "Abandon All Hope" location along with so many other threads you have created. Let's see if that turns into a reality.
Click to expand...

Reality itself is a "result that does not agree with theoretical predictions",

or did you want reality to follow your "theories".

Wake up...
 
Jack by the hedge said:
No, I don't get it. If I conduct an experiment to test a theory, why would you assume my theory contradicts reality? Do you just assume every experiment is actually testing a Theory of Everything?
Click to expand...

You test theories in reality.

Reality had to be made before you existed, and for this reason only reality is something else than what you imagine, until you make the entire reality again.

When your theory is close to reality, the results from the experiments of your theory are close to reality...but...

you didn't make an experiment that can make the entire reality...

until then, something else than what you imagine, is really happening.

No?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom