Source, can't read the results on that small slide.
Oops, the paint is not like thermite; in fact the thermite is not thermite? You know what it really is?ae911 truth slideshow i think page 181 or near
Actually several tests heating it in different manners has shown the stuff to be more explosive than c4.
[qimg]http://i389.photobucket.com/albums/oo332/subedei11/Slide180_PNG.jpg[/qimg]
Oops, KMnO4 is not thermite, you left out something; like the rest of the story. Why is your thermite contaminated so bad?k mn 0 = kmn04
as for carbon thats an oxygen not carbon
http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2005_Adv_Mat_KMnO4.pdf
This is pretty much the same signature as the spheres .And would explain the molten molybdenum spheres.
Do you make this up as you go?http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2005_Adv_Mat_KMnO4.pdf
This is pretty much the same signature as the spheres .And would explain the molten molybdenum spheres.
As for the Carbon ,woops i was reading it last night after quite a few beers.![]()
The samples are tested on a peice of Carbon when during xeds testing so contamination levels vary depending on which point you point it at.
I would like to see more xeds samples of the stuff,Apparently all that stuff is posted on scholars for 911 truth Forum, But i dont have access to that.
Ask Ref hes a member apparently
Alot of different thermite reactions took place ,because each one has its own advantage like speed of reaction etc
I concur. (And why do suspect the scales of the graphs are different in the two spectra).Exactly what I would expect in a mixture of kaolin and iron oxide. Where is the evidence of thermite?
Gage reminds me of their leader waiting for some comet to scoop them up and save them from the evil NWO. Gage is the best example of a cult leader. But basing your delusion on an event is dangerous, as your cult members learn, gain knowledge and start using sound judgment they leave and denounce Gage and expose his ignorance.Wow. Picked up by Hale-Bopp. That ROCKS!
No I'm directly analysing the EDS spectra that you have produced (one on the left) and I'm telling you in a professional capacity that a) it doesn't match the other (thermite) spectra you have produced and b) it's closer to red paint.firstly your comparing nanothermite to eds of commerical thermite you buy on ebay.
That would be a good start and I look forward to the results.But ill gladly show the eds spectra to my local univeristy.Ill post my results on a hand held cam on you tube.I wont be in that city for a while though.Perhaps you could do it as well
http://www.enme.umd.edu/~mrz/pdf_papers/2005_Adv_Mat_KMnO4.pdf
This is pretty much the same signature as the spheres .And would explain the molten molybdenum spheres.