• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

A line in the sand - Aldo steps up.

OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.
I have the evidence. For national security reasons, you are not allowed to see it yet.
Sorry, for the privacy and safety of the witnesses, they remain confidential until they testify in a court of law. There are a lot of nut-job debunkers and NWO mercenaries out there, ya know.
sorry, you will have to wait just like everyone else. When they testify in a court of law, then you will find out. You have little respect for the personal safety and privacy of others, which is a common trait among the archie debunkers.

These are Galileos statements, they are backed with zero evidence.
 
Last edited:
OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.

Let ME clear this up. You have ZERO witnesses, solid, liquid, or gaseous. NOBODY saw the Pentagon flyover. It didn't happen.
 
Wrong on all counts.

1)

You have no physical evidence that FL77 didn't fly over the Pentagon.

2)

You don't have any physical evidence that FL77 flew into the Pentagon.

3)

Physical evidence is only as good as the witnesses who provided it. You have no witnesses who have procured any physical evidence.

4)

Absence of evidence is the evidence of absence.



Originally I thought you were sort of an online performance artist, pulling our legs. I now believe that you are almost as disturbed as Ultima1 and Homeland Insurgency.

1)
The physical evidence that the plane did NOT fly over the Pentagon is the aircraft wreckage found inside the building and on the lawn.

2)
Yes, having pieces of the plane means having physical evidence. The remains of the passengers and crew also constitute physical evidence.

3)
Witness testimony is not physical evidence. The imbecilic fraud Craig Ranke doesn't understand this simple fact.

4)
The presence of evidence is evidence of presence.


You really can't think at all, can you?
 
Sorry, for the privacy and safety of the witnesses, they remain confidential until they testify in a court of law. There are a lot of nut-job debunkers and NWO mercenaries out there, ya know.


Sorry, there isn't going to be any trial. Craig and Aldo won't get anywhere near a courtroom until one of their victims sues them.
 
Wrong. The witnesses can provide direct evidence to a court of law.

Which does not change that fact that your statement of a witness you heard about from another and what this witness had to say is still double hearsay.

And good luck with one witness vs one hundred witnesses - numbers are pretty much going to trump on this issue.
 
Sorry, for the privacy and safety of the witnesses, they remain confidential until they testify in a court of law. There are a lot of nut-job debunkers and NWO mercenaries out there, ya know.

Except on a sitcom or Hollywood movie, you do not get to spring surprise witnesses, they must be disclosed and made available to the other side.

Its called discovery.

Check out the civil rules of procedure.
 
Except on a sitcom or Hollywood movie, you do not get to spring surprise witnesses, they must be disclosed and made available to the other side.

Its called discovery.

Check out the civil rules of procedure.

The interrogatories be interesting.
 
Originally I thought you were sort of an online performance artist, pulling our legs. I now believe that you are almost as disturbed as Ultima1 and Homeland Insurgency.

1)
The physical evidence that the plane did NOT fly over the Pentagon is the aircraft wreckage found inside the building and on the lawn.




You really can't think at all, can you?

The best you got here is a witness who says they found the plane parts inside. I doubt you even have an actual witness. Produce it!
 
The best you got here is a witness who says they found the plane parts inside. I doubt you even have an actual witness. Produce it!
Your moronic lies are the best you have.

RADAR proves the aircraft seen impacting the Pentagon was 77.

FDR has over 25 hours of previous flights proving it was 77 found in the Pentagon.

DNA from real people on flight 77 was found in the Pentagon where 77 came to rest in thousands of pieces.

Your lack of knowledge, logic, and rational thought on 911 matches your insane claim to be the Galileo.

RADAR
77RadarTrack.jpg

RADAR proves you are a liar. This is proof you can't refute because as the real Galileo you don't understand RADAR. You lost this one. Again. Why are you pushing dirt dumb ideas and posting lies?
http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/77RadarTrack.jpg
 
you're just jealous because you've never had a famous scientist like Fetzer invite you out for lunch. Sour grapes will get you nowhere in this forum.
Theology is a science? I learn something every day.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom