• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

A line in the sand - Aldo steps up.

FineWine said:
NEWS UPDATE:

Police have identified the Pentagon flyover witness and have established a cause of death. The man, described as obese with a shaggy black beard, was known only as Bluto, although several insiders maintain that he was called Brutus by associates. He died as a result of a severe beating.

A suspect is in custody, but authorities are withholding his name. Sources hint that the suspect is a former member of the U.S. Navy who smokes a pipe and has unusually large forearms.

A press conference is scheduled for tomorrow.
Click to expand...


Yes I heard about this as well. Apparently there were also some small bits of a leafy, green vegetable matter scattered near his corpse.
 
A very tall thin woman with a high voice was also questioned as well as a short portly man begging for money for a hamburger.
 
jhunter1163 said:
Patsy Cline - Crazy
Click to expand...
Burn down all your idols
Destroy your idols
Create a scene
There goes all your reason
It's helter skelter
It's not a dream

Come down from the altar
Remove your blindfold
What do you see
Nothing left to do here
There's nothing new here
It's all the same

You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?
You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?
You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?

Hare Hare Krishna
Was that your sister
Or a cover girl
A wasted prima donna
She lost her way here
She disappeared

Come back to your altar
And build a fire
It's getting cold
Nothing stops you in here
There's not a stone here
You're all alone

You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?
You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?
You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?

Kill the new religion
No inhibition
No alibi
Televised confession
A true obsession
It's all new lies

Miscommunication
Misinformation
A perfect waste
Bite the sacred apple
And suck the poison
Enjoy the taste

You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?
You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?
You're going down, down, down
You're going down, down, down
You're going down, down, down
How low can you go?

How low can you go?
How low can you go?
How low can you go?
How low can you go?
How low can you go?

Lyrics to Subhuman by Garbage
 
Bobert said:
Aldo is over at the PFT forum proudly quoting OBL and his original denial of 9-11 involvement.
Aldo even bolds OBL's name.
I am proud that Aldo has his heroes.
Click to expand...

When you have nothing left, you grasp at straws, and try to convince people they are strings of gold.

sad really.

TAM:)
 
OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.
 
Galileo said:
OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.
Click to expand...

So...what happened to your half wit?

Thanks, in advance.
 
Galileo said:
OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.
Click to expand...

Physical evidence trumps eyewitnesses. Sorry.
 
Dog Town said:
So...what happened to your half wit?

Thanks, in advance.
Click to expand...
He thinks a half person is a dead person. Or something; it is new math for CIT moronic math club.

I thought he was counting Balsamo as the halfwit; but it should be nitwit.

In the court of law the DNA, RADAR, FDR, and the thousands of aircraft parts from 77 with settle the fact 77 impacted the Pentagon.

We have the morons of CIT and Balsamo failed ideas based on witnesses interviews many years after 911.
 
Trojan said:
You saying there is a witnesse because someone told you there is a witness is like double hearsay - good luck with that.
Click to expand...


Exactly. Its like saying my neighbor told me there were 2 1/2 unicorns in my yard last night that told him Santa landed on my roof. Except one of them was hit by a car crossing the street.
 
Galileo said:
OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.
Click to expand...

Awesome. So when will these court proceedings begin?
 
Galileo said:
Aldo has at least 2 1/2 eyewitnesses to the Pentagon flyover.
Click to expand...

When I had dinner with Dr. Fetzer he told me that the 1/2 witness is only considered a 1/2 witness because he was wearing an eye patch at the time.

He also told me you have terrible table manners and chew with your mouth open.
 
Galileo said:
OK, let me clear this up. There are two solid eyewitnesses who saw the Pentagon flyover, enough to prove a basic fact in a normal court proceeding. There is a third eyewitness who died last year. And there are three other potential witnesses who could also likely testify in court as to seeing the flyover. So we have 6 eyewitnesses in all.
Click to expand...

Any chance you could offer up the statements from these two solid witnesses?
 
Trojan said:
You saying there is a witnesse because someone told you there is a witness is like double hearsay - good luck with that.
Click to expand...

Wrong. The witnesses can provide direct evidence to a court of law.
 
Galileo said:
Wrong. The witnesses can provide direct evidence to a court of law.
Click to expand...

If they existed, maybe. The problem you have is, YOU have no evidence they even exist, much less what they may, or may not have to say! Forget the mountain of evidence, they will never over turn.
Get it yet?
 
HyJinX said:
Physical evidence trumps eyewitnesses. Sorry.
Click to expand...

Wrong on all counts.

1)

You have no physical evidence that FL77 didn't fly over the Pentagon.

2)

You don't have any physical evidence that FL77 flew into the Pentagon.

3)

Physical evidence is only as good as the witnesses who provided it. You have no witnesses who have procured any physical evidence.

4)

Absence of evidence is the evidence of absence.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Share this page

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom