• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Merged A God of Love / The Living God

fagin said:
Thank you my son Mother abaddon, and join us in a divine three way trinity.

Bork away.
Click to expand...

Why thank you Mother Fagin
Updated tally...

Mother Fagin=4 borks
Mother abaddon=4 borks
Mother kali1137= 4 borks
Mother halleyscomet=2 borks
Mother TofuFighter= 2 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork

However, since I have now referred to Mother Fagin twice in this post, the updated list is
Updated tally...

Mother Fagin=6 borks
Mother kali1137= 4 borks
Mother abaddon=4 borks
Mother halleyscomet=2 borks
Mother TofuFighter= 2 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork

Fagin is GOD. So far.
 
Thank you for the updated score Mother Abaddon.

Mother TofuFighter and Mother Halleyscomet, please continue to join in the divine goodness.
 
fagin said:
Thank you my son Mother abaddon, and join us in a divine three way trinity.

Bork away.
Click to expand...

Why thank you Mother Fagin
Updated tally...

Mother Fagin=4 borks
Mother abaddon=4 borks
Mother kali1137= 4 borks
Mother halleyscomet=2 borks
Mother TofuFighter= 2 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork

However, since I have now referred to Mother Fagin twice in this post, the updated list is
Updated tally...

Mother Fagin=6 borks
Mother kali1137= 4 borks
Mother abaddon=4 borks
Mother halleyscomet=2 borks
Mother TofuFighter= 2 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork

Fagin is GOD. So far.

Oops. Oops, "Mother abaddon". That gives me 5 borks. I am catching up.

Mother Fagin=6 borks
Mother abaddon=5 borks
Mother kali1137= 4 borks
Mother halleyscomet=2 borks
Mother TofuFighter= 2 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork
 
kali1137 said:
Thank you for the updated score Mother Abaddon.

Mother TofuFighter and Mother Halleyscomet, please continue to join in the divine goodness.
Click to expand...

Dammit, again with the updates. Alright...

Mother Fagin=6 borks
Mother abaddon=6 borks
Mother kali1137= 4 borks
Mother halleyscomet=3 borks
Mother TofuFighter= 3 borks
Johanabrahams=1 bork
 
Johanabrahams said:
Maybe you are on to something. Tell us more.
Click to expand...


No.

I don’t know enough about the ways in which you abuse children to say more. I don’t know enough about the mind of an abuser to speculate. The fact you are a abusive is no longer really debatable at this stage. If the documentaries I’ve seen over the years are any indication, some abusers actually get off on reminiscing about the abuse, so I’m certainly not going to give you spank bank material by trying to guess what kind of abuser you are.

Johanabrahams said:
Yep. You were trying to say that God is into creating bad lives for people by stealing and killing their stock.




And I said that in Job is the evidence that God always give more when something was taken for a special purpose. He is not a thief. He always focuses on what is better for us.
Click to expand...


I see you never read the sections about the Conquest of Canaan. Or the rebuilding of the Temple after the Babylonian exile. Or really learned much about the lives of the Apostles.

Claiming that the pigs and the fig tree were replaced with your only “evidence” being extrapolation from Job requires rank and deliberate ignorance of large swaths of the Bible. You’re extrapolating from an extraordinary situation to the general. Your theology appears to be the kind of soft-shoe nonsense of people who chose to whitewash the difficult questions of the Bible rather than confront them.

I’m OK with that kind of laziness when it’s in the hands of genuinely nice people for whom religion is largely an excuse for running soup kitchens and job programs for the homeless, but it becomes a dangerous manipulation tool in the hands of a dime store Jim Jones such as yourself.

Then of course there’s the rank sexism of your using Job as a model. Job’s wife and children certainly aren’t compensated for their brutal murders, are they? God murders them to test Job, but you’re OK with that because they get replaced. Then there are all the other people in his household who were murdered as part of his test. You’re OK with people being murdered so long as the person you see as “owning” those people gets compensation. That’s sick.
 
Johanabrahams said:
Nice photos. Children like playing games.
Click to expand...



I know you’re trying to be insulting by referring to the people wiping the floor with you as “children” but it really just ends up coming across as lazy on your part. It’s an admission that you have no substantive response.

Every time you call me a child, I see not the insult you intend, but a concession. You’re admitting I’ve rhetorically spit-roasted you and the best you have is a lame retort of desperation, like a bully tacking a nonsensical, “Well, your mom’s a whore!” To the end of the moment where he’s defeated.

The problem you seem unable to confront is that we aren’t taken in by your veneer of paternalism. We see it for what it is, the small, petty, desperate ploy of a man who is out of ideas.

Johanabrahams said:
Did you investigate?
Click to expand...


Yes.

Your most recent lies have been about the Facebook incident. There’s no investigation needed to know you’re lying about that. I was part of the conversation when it happened.

You’re a liar. I know you’re a liar.
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
I know you’re trying to be insulting by referring to the people wiping the floor with you as “children” but it really just ends up coming across as lazy on your part. It’s an admission that you have no substantive response.

Every time you call me a child, I see not the insult you intend, but a concession. You’re admitting I’ve rhetorically spit-roasted you and the best you have is a lame retort of desperation, like a bully tacking a nonsensical, “Well, your mom’s a whore!” To the end of the moment where he’s defeated.

The problem you seem unable to confront is that we aren’t taken in by your veneer of paternalism. We see it for what it is, the small, petty, desperate ploy of a man who is out of ideas.



Yes.

Your most recent lies have been about the Facebook incident. There’s no investigation needed to know you’re lying about that. I was part of the conversation when it happened.

You’re a liar. I know you’re a liar.
Click to expand...


Amen mother halley
 
Nay_Sayer said:
Amen mother halley
Click to expand...



It gets better. He’s trying to contact me through Facebook messenger. He must be REALLY confused about this dynamic if he thinks it’s a GOOD idea to try and initiate a conversation with me in a venue not bound by this forum’s rules. Yes, Facebook has its own rules and I know the odds are good someone he knows will be able to take screen shots and post them online, but I’m still left with the ability to tell him what I really think instead of just what the forum’s rules will let me say.

To quote Bugs Bunny, “He don’t know me very well, do he?”
 
Border Reiver said:
I'll get the popcorn and beer....
Click to expand...

His initial message was rather predictable. I'm not sure I can post much if any of his actual comments until his suspension ends due to forum rules against acting as a proxy for a banned or suspended user. That said, I replied to him and I ended my reply with:

Now, a warning. If you wish to continue talking to me on Facebook messenger, I will be posting portions of our conversation to the ISF thread. Continuing to contact me constitutes consent to me redistributing our conversation, in whole or in part, in any media or venue I deem appropriate.
Click to expand...

While this may scare him off of responding, being able to actually use the text as I see fit is worth the risk.

Edit:

I've reported my own post to the moderators to ask for clarification.
 
Last edited:
halleyscomet said:
It gets better. He’s trying to contact me through Facebook messenger. He must be REALLY confused about this dynamic if he thinks it’s a GOOD idea to try and initiate a conversation with me in a venue not bound by this forum’s rules. Yes, Facebook has its own rules and I know the odds are good someone he knows will be able to take screen shots and post them online, but I’m still left with the ability to tell him what I really think instead of just what the forum’s rules will let me say.

To quote Bugs Bunny, “He don’t know me very well, do he?”
Click to expand...

In the end, Johan's master plan was to get more friends on facebook to help him grow his Farmville crops.
 
abaddon said:
OK WTF? Take one's eye off the ball and suddenly Johan is suspended? Anyone have any info?
Click to expand...

The public notice lists it as a Rule 8 violation:

"You may only post a Member's personal information if it is both publicly available and is relevant to the ongoing discussion."

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=323846

After the security settings on the Zola Facebook post were opened up, he posted some information from Facebook that he considered to be data about actual forum members. He also launched into efforts to get another poster to give him their real name. It was all super creepy. There was also an image that was posted but the link was deleted by the moderators before I saw the image.

Basically, there were at least half a dozen posts I saw that could easily meet the criteria of a Rule 8 violation. I suspect the sheer number of them in such a short time frame, combined with obvious data gathering for future stalking, all combined to make the suspension necessary.
 
halleyscomet said:
It gets better. He’s trying to contact me through Facebook messenger. He must be REALLY confused about this dynamic if he thinks it’s a GOOD idea to try and initiate a conversation with me in a venue not bound by this forum’s rules. Yes, Facebook has its own rules and I know the odds are good someone he knows will be able to take screen shots and post them online, but I’m still left with the ability to tell him what I really think instead of just what the forum’s rules will let me say.

To quote Bugs Bunny, “He don’t know me very well, do he?”
Click to expand...

Good grief, what a maroon.
 
jond said:
Good grief, what a maroon.
Click to expand...

People seem quote confused by his "call me mother" routine. He's also trying to direct people to his wife's Facebook profile.

He also clearly does NOT get how "liking" a thing on Facebook works. In one post he comments on the lack of dislikes, as if that were a thing on Facebook. He really does seem to think someone clicking "like" on a post means they agree 100% with its content.
 
halleyscomet said:
People seem quote confused by his "call me mother" routine. He's also trying to direct people to his wife's Facebook profile.

He also clearly does NOT get how "liking" a thing on Facebook works. In one post he comments on the lack of dislikes, as if that were a thing on Facebook. He really does seem to think someone clicking "like" on a post means they agree 100% with its content.
Click to expand...

Yeah, dude has, um, issues...
 
My prediction is that after his fortnight suspension - coupled with his thought process that his kids tattled on him, that he will not return to the thread. He will most likely find another forum to spout his god thoughts and add us to the list of places he got banned for being god.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom