A Flight 93 : WTC 7 connection

Bloody hell! It's Galileo! THE Galileo!

This is old hat. FL93 was headed towards NYC when it was shot down. It got stuck in the runway for 43 minutes, so it didn't have time to get back to WTC 7.

Link to a source UA93 was heading for NYC?

When the flight delay was announced, two dark skinned men got up and left the plane. as reported by the Pittsburg Press.

Link to a source that two dark skinned men got up and left the plane?

There were several reports of a third plane heading towards the WTC, including one by Rudy Ghouliani.

Fog of war. There was a lot a panic, a lot of uncertainties and a lot going on.
 
I'm pretty sure if 7 wasn't leased by a Jew, little grey rabbit would hold absolutely no interest in this.
 
Last edited:
Only in a truthers mind is an airplane course pointed ESE and straight towards Washington DC is actually heading towards NYC.
 
[qimg]http://www.isomerset.com/pics/flight93route.png[/qimg]

http://www.isomerset.com/pics/flight93route.png

m23714_600.jpg
 
Bloody hell! It's Galileo! THE Galileo!



Link to a source UA93 was heading for NYC?



Link to a source that two dark skinned men got up and left the plane?



Fog of war. There was a lot a panic, a lot of uncertainties and a lot going on.

Wait a minute - you mean he wasn't being ironic?

Oh man...
 
UA93 was headed for NYC, and the flightpath is the evidence?

Wow. Just wow. Words cannot... I can't...

Wow.
 
i think galileo is looking at the flight path backwards

although i dont know if that helps or hurts his credibility
 
jref is informative and fun but it's by no means a place to access the greatest repository of 9/11 information. And as I've said before, despite what the leading debunkers here would have you believe, it's not even the place for the most civil discussions on the subject.
yet you post here every single day
 
Given progressive collapse of buildings is a rather rare event, Occam's razor would suggest when 3 progressive collapses happen in a small radius and a small time frame that they would each have the same cause.

Congratulations on this week's most egregious misinterpretation of the nature of Occam's razor. This is why we worry about truthers being allowed to handle sharp objects.

Dave
 
[qimg]http://i286.photobucket.com/albums/ll116/tjkb/1ProofFlt93goIn2DC.jpg[/qimg]

Going directly to DC. You provided proof 93 was flying to DC and where the Passengers on Flight 93 got up and took action; something 911 truth can't do; take action and figure out 911.

911 truth is self-debunking. Do you know where NYC is?

You have self-debunked yourself. FL93 turned directly towards NYC, right before it spiraled out of control to the ground. (shot down)
 
You have self-debunked yourself. FL93 turned directly towards NYC, right before it spiraled out of control to the ground. (shot down)


NTSB report on AA77 & UA93 said:
Shortly after the EFIS was switched to VOR mode, the frequency of the left VOR receiver was set to 111.0 MHz, corresponding to the VOR station located at Washington Reagan National Airport (DCA). At the time the DCA frequency was selected, the station was too far away for its signals to be received by the receiver. If DCA VOR had been in range, the display on the EHSI could have been used to show the airplane’s position relative to an inbound radial to DCA, and thus help navigate the airplane towards DCA. The selection of the DCA VOR frequency in the airplane’s left VOR receiver suggests that the operators of the airplane had an interest in DCA, and may have wanted to use that VOR station to help navigate the airplane towards Washington.

The magnetic heading of 120 degrees selected in the autopilot MCP was the correct heading for flying to Washington.


Do you understand what the above means?


Tom
 

Back
Top Bottom