A Flight 93 : WTC 7 connection

RedIbis said:
Labeling aside, the best site for any 9/11 research is cooperativeresearch.org.

And despite Mackey's wishful thinking, for daily updates and headlines for all things 9/11 check 911blogger. Most of the sites that Mackey et al will recommend,such as http://sites.google.com/site/wtc7lies/ are biased and wildly out of date.
Click to expand...

Hee hee! You are on the best site for any 9/11 research, champ.

Hell if you ever took a position (other than blaming the FDNY for the collapse of WTC7) you'd know that by now.
 
little grey rabbit said:
Think how tempting the combination is, instead of heading for the White House, Flight 93 (or the drone plane pretending to be Flight 93 or whatever the latest fashion is) was instead heading for WTC7. WTC7 being the 3rd highest building after 1 and 2 would make a logical target.
Click to expand...

There are LOTS of other buildings in NYC that would be more logical targets. The Empire State Building, Statue of Liberty, Chrysler Building, and on and on.

And I agree with 16.5. If you're interested in the actual truth about what happened on 9/11, this is the place. If you're interested in the Bush-bashing NWO-espousing conspiracy-under-every-rock finding hologram-hugging "truth" (you'll have to imagine me doing the finger quotes here), not so much.
 
So the US government wanted to crash UA93 into WTC7 and then blow it up, and the US government also faked all the phone calls and then shot UA93 down?

Were there two teams working on this, and were they not communicating?
 
Bell said:
So the US government wanted to crash UA93 into WTC7 and then blow it up, and the US government also faked all the phone calls and then shot UA93 down?

Were there two teams working on this, and were they not communicating?
Click to expand...
This is why I ask truthers for their hypothesis.
 
" highest quality truth site out there."

Thats an oxymoron. If you mean most mercenary, The Pilots for 911 truth come about the
closest to unbridled commercial rip off. If you mean most haunted by Holocaust deniers and vaccines insanity etc then "911oz" is the place for you.
 
T.A.M. said:
yet you keep coming back here.

TAM:)
Click to expand...

jref is informative and fun but it's by no means a place to access the greatest repository of 9/11 information. And as I've said before, despite what the leading debunkers here would have you believe, it's not even the place for the most civil discussions on the subject.
 
RedIbis said:
jref is informative and fun but it's by no means a place to access the greatest repository of 9/11 information. And as I've said before, despite what the leading debunkers here would have you believe, it's not even the place for the most civil discussions on the subject.
Click to expand...
Okay then, I'd like to invite you to go to where they have the greatest repository of 9/11 information and where more civil discussions are held. Good bye.
 
Last edited:
sylvan8798 said:
Isn't Bill Smith a proponent of the idea that Flight 93 was headed for Building 7? I thought he mentioned that at some point?
Click to expand...

One of the reasons he should be on every-ones ignore list.
There isn't a crazy claim he hasn't nailed his board to or been the author of
 
little grey rabbit said:
...
All of which is by the by while I wait for the recommendation of the highest quality truth site out there.
You guys are the experts, after all.
Click to expand...
The local insane asylum is the best quality truther site, or go to ATS, they have some "quality" insane truthers who continue to insist there was no Flight 77 at the Pentagon and other idiotic woo.

Quality truther site? How do you measure the quality of lies, hearsay, delusions and moronic failed ideas?


little grey rabbit said:
... the pull order. ...
Click to expand...
The pull order? lol, the dumbest idea from 911 truth, the pull order. They pulled the fire support which is proved by the fact no fire fighting was done at WTC7. When you can't get pull the fire support right, you have no chance at using logic with facts and evidence to make rational conclusions. You prefer delusions and are asking where you can find the quality site where lies are preferred instead of truth. pushing for 9 years of failure - 911 truth.

Interesting you picked Flight 93; Flight 93 Passengers figured out 911 in minutes and took action, 911 truth remains 8 years clueless looking for lies instead of evidence. Flight 93 Passengers set the standard for understanding 911, 911 truth sets the depths of ignorance, lower each day.

It would be interesting to see UBL laughing at the dolts in 911 truth making up lies to apologize for UBL's one hit wonder.
 
Last edited:
RedIbis said:
jref is informative and fun but it's by no means a place to access the greatest repository of 9/11 information. And as I've said before, despite what the leading debunkers here would have you believe, it's not even the place for the most civil discussions on the subject.
Click to expand...

2006-2007, there were lots of civil discussions here. Some of the best discussion ever...back then we gave visitors the benefit of the doubt, and entertained, at least at first, their ridiculous ideas.

It is near impossible to have a "civil" conversation with the same sock puppets making the same insane points, with the same insane beliefs.

When the Jones Harritt paper came about, the first new thing in a while, it was civilly discussed, and is still today (albeit thanks to moderation).

I agree with you, that these days this place is not the place for a good debate on 9/11 truth...but then again, there is little if anything left to debate...

TAM:)
 
little grey rabbit said:
Has any troother ever suggested a connection between the downed airliner in Shanksville (flight 93???) and the collapse of WTC-7?

Think how tempting the combination is, instead of heading for the White House, Flight 93 (or the drone plane pretending to be Flight 93 or whatever the latest fashion is) was instead heading for WTC7. WTC7 being the 3rd highest building after 1 and 2 would make a logical target.

Then after the "Lets Roll" (TM) heroism (or malfunction of the Flight-93 look-alike drone) this was no longer available for a strike. What to do? The explosives were all in place, with everyone running around the WTC there was no way they could be removed without people noticing.

There was only one thing to do and so Larry Silverstein decided to "pull the building".

Someone must have already come up with this, though. Any names?
Click to expand...

No names for you, but what would the symbolic value of flying a plane into WTC 7 be? I had never heard of it until 9/11, and I don't think many people outside of NYC had either.

Much more plausible is the plan of flying the plane into the White House or the Capitol building.
 
little grey rabbit said:
Has any troother ever suggested a connection between the downed airliner in Shanksville (flight 93???) and the collapse of WTC-7?

Think how tempting the combination is, instead of heading for the White House, Flight 93 (or the drone plane pretending to be Flight 93 or whatever the latest fashion is) was instead heading for WTC7. WTC7 being the 3rd highest building after 1 and 2 would make a logical target.

Then after the "Lets Roll" (TM) heroism (or malfunction of the Flight-93 look-alike drone) this was no longer available for a strike. What to do? The explosives were all in place, with everyone running around the WTC there was no way they could be removed without people noticing.

There was only one thing to do and so Larry Silverstein decided to "pull the building".

Someone must have already come up with this, though. Any names?
Click to expand...

This is old hat. FL93 was headed towards NYC when it was shot down. It got stuck in the runway for 43 minutes, so it didn't have time to get back to WTC 7.

When the flight delay was announced, two dark skinned men got up and left the plane. as reported by the Pittsburg Press.

There were several reports of a third plane heading towards the WTC, including one by Rudy Ghouliani.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom