911 Facts Consolidated

Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh, I think we all know where the idiot is - for idiocy resides in the mind of a person who rejects 42 other videos that clearly evidence planes hitting the WTC because one of them "is too dark".

You are a loon, sir.
 
Clayton Moore said:
Then there is the misinformation that they were found in the rubble.
Click to expand...

You haven't acknowledged the fact that there were passengers on those planes, have you? You can't claim there were no passengers, so what happened to them Clayton?
 
MIKILLINI said:
You haven't acknowledged the fact that there were passengers on those planes, have you? You can't claim there were no passengers, so what happened to them Clayton?
Click to expand...

I have asked truthers that question before and never received an answer. They don't appear to be versed in replying to questions that impinge upon reality.
 
dafydd said:
I have asked truthers that question before and never received an answer. They don't appear to be versed in replying to questions that impinge upon reality.
Click to expand...

No no no! That is what a new investigation must reveal!
 
000063 said:
That's strange. I posted three videos. Why are you only addressing one?

Which indicates...what, to you? Please support your claims with evidence.
And how many people was that? Ballpark figure.
Click to expand...

Clayton Moore said:
Why were the videos dark on a bright sunny day?
Click to expand...

*snerk*

It is amazing how Clay has never actually outright said that the videos being "dark" and "hazy" or anything else indicates that they are "obviously doctored".
 
Last edited:
000063 said:
*snerk*

It is amazing how Clay has never actually outright said that the videos being "dark" and "hazy" or anything else indicates that they are "obviously doctored".
Click to expand...

He seems to have adopted the ultimate no-position position where you don't even ask questions but imply by innuendo that something conspiratorial is happening.
 
I will sum up claytons posts with paraphasing agreat movie line(from a not so great film)

In your nonsensical, rambling, incoherent posts, Nothing you have typed has in anyway, shape or form come close to anything resembling an intelligent thought. Everyone in this thread is now dumber for aving read your rubbish. I award you no points and may the FSM have mercy on your soul.
 
too dark?

ok a few suggestions
-camera was left on manual aperature and not adjusted further open
-camera had a choice of filters, wrong one is being used
-camera had a contrast level setting which is set too high.
-camera had video black level set too high
-file was created but the conversion process allowed for a change in video level which had not been changed since the previous file was created
 
Last edited:
jaydeehess said:
too dark?

ok a few suggestions
-camera was left on manual aperature and not adjusted further open
-camera had a choice of filters, wrong one is being used
-camera had a contrast level setting which is set too high.
-camera had video black level set too high
-file was created but the conversion process allowed for a change in video level which had not been changed since the previous file was created
Click to expand...

The "hazy" shot he was complaining about was a very wide shot and had most of Jersey in the background. So we have a hot day, in NY, looking over NJ, with some of the worst air pollution in the country. Do the math Clay.
 
Justin39640 said:
The "hazy" shot he was complaining about was a very wide shot and had most of Jersey in the background. So we have a hot day, in NY, looking over NJ, with some of the worst air pollution in the country. Do the math Clay.
Click to expand...

I remember being in NYC one hot summer day, I could not see the Statue of Liberty from Battery Park because of the haze
 
tsig said:
He seems to have adopted the ultimate no-position position where you don't even ask questions but imply by innuendo that something conspiratorial is happening.
Click to expand...

Well, he will say they were doctored, he just absolutely refuses to say how, or how that assertion connects to his previous JAQing off.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom