911 Facts Consolidated

Status
Not open for further replies.
No. Discussing the absurdity that that all FOUR could be lost or damaged beyond recognition means there were no planes.

And what would it mean if ...

(from UA175)
"... a six-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson, and small bone fragments of Lisa Frost ..." were identified,

AND

(From AA11)
"... workers found bodies strapped to airplane seats and discovered the body of a flight attendant with her hands bound ..." AND "... medical examiners had identified the remains of 33 victims who had been on board Flight 11 ..." AND medical workers "... identified two other Flight 11 victims, including the lead flight attendant Karen Martin, after body fragments were discovered near Ground Zero in 2006 ..." AND "... in April 2007, examiners using newer DNA technology identified another Flight 11 victim ..." AND "... the remains of two hijackers, potentially from Flight 11, were also identified."

What would THAT mean, Clayton?

Just askin' questions...
 
Last edited:
And what would it mean if ...

(from UA175)
"... a six-inch piece of bone belonging to Peter Hanson, and small bone fragments of Lisa Frost ..." were identified,

AND

(From AA11)
"... workers found bodies strapped to airplane seats and discovered the body of a flight attendant with her hands bound ..." AND "... medical examiners had identified the remains of 33 victims who had been on board Flight 11 ..." AND medical workers "... identified two other Flight 11 victims, including the lead flight attendant Karen Martin, after body fragments were discovered near Ground Zero in 2006 ..." AND "... in April 2007, examiners using newer DNA technology identified another Flight 11 victim ..." AND "... the remains of two hijackers, potentially from Flight 11, were also identified."

What would THAT mean, Clayton?
That the NWO controls everybody except a handful of truthers?
 
To be fair, I have seen C7 admit to a few, but that's about it.
That occasional bit of concession is one of the reasons I regard C7 as the cleverest troll posting here.

HOWEVER have you ever seen C7 engage in discussion of a significant issue - say one that actually progressed discussion towards resolving the claim of CD which is the main plank of AE911Truth strategy?

...(in anticipation) I thought not.

...clever trolling isn't it? ;)
 
Body fragments but neither hide nor hair of any black boxes.

To nobody's surprise, this is not an answer to my question.

I asked you "What does it mean (regarding the involvement of those specific planes) that they found body fragments & DNA of the passengers who embarked on those planes in the WTC debris?"

Please provide an answer.

And then I'll answer your query "What does it mean that they never found the FDRs or VDRs?"
 
To nobody's surprise, this is not an answer to my question.

I asked you "What does it mean (regarding the involvement of those specific planes) that they found body fragments & DNA of the passengers who embarked on those planes in the WTC debris?"

It means about the same as "Iraq has WMD", the CDC saying ground zero was safe, and any other instance of a US government authority lying to the public.


Hundreds of thousands of people died as a result of that lie about WMD. Who knows how many have died and will die as a result of the CDC lie.
 
It means about the same as "Iraq has WMD", the CDC saying ground zero was safe, and any other instance of a US government authority lying to the public.


Hundreds of thousands of people died as a result of that lie about WMD. Who knows how many have died and will die as a result of the CDC lie.

That is some fancy *********** thread jacking.

Clayton you posted a poorly researched, poorly written piece of **** from 2007.

Own it man! None of this No Planer **** or EPA ****.

You are Clayton Moore bro!

Stand behind that post my man.

The world is *********** counting on you.

/lulz.
 
That occasional bit of concession is one of the reasons I regard C7 as the cleverest troll posting here.

HOWEVER have you ever seen C7 engage in discussion of a significant issue - say one that actually progressed discussion towards resolving the claim of CD which is the main plank of AE911Truth strategy?

...(in anticipation) I thought not.

...clever trolling isn't it? ;)

Yep, occasionally staking out a position you're willing to abandon is just good strategy.
 
It means about the same as "Iraq has WMD", the CDC saying ground zero was safe, and any other instance of a US government authority lying to the public.


Hundreds of thousands of people died as a result of that lie about WMD. Who knows how many have died and will die as a result of the CDC lie.

Ahhh, all the medical researchers are "inside jobbers". Got it.

I should have known better. It's not your fault, Clayton. It's mine. For thinking that you might provide a non-insane answer to a simple question.

Back on ignore you go. Remember to take those meds.

Oh, before I go, I promised you that I'd answer your question. Here ya go:

"The fact that they never found the 4 black boxes from AA11 & UA175 means ...

... shhhhh, keep it between us ...

... they never found the boxes.

That's it.

Probably had sumthin to do with having passed thru a 800 foot long blender with 10 ton blades.

C'ya.

(As my niece likes to add...) "Wouldn't want to be ya!"
 
Ahhh, all the medical researchers are "inside jobbers". Got it.

I should have known better. It's not your fault, Clayton. It's mine. For thinking that you might provide a non-insane answer to a simple question.

Back on ignore you go. Remember to take those meds.

Oh, before I go, I promised you that I'd answer your question. Here ya go:

"The fact that they never found the 4 black boxes from AA11 & UA175 means ...

... shhhhh, keep it between us ...

... they never found the boxes.

That's it.

Probably had sumthin to do with having passed thru a 800 foot long blender with 10 ton blades.

C'ya.

AHAHHHAHA A blender? A blender that pulverizes? In one pass?
 
A blender? A blender that pulverizes? In one pass?

Considering the forces the aircrafts went through, which no doubt would blow your feeble little mind, it's an apt analogy.

And again, 9/11 wasn't the first time they were able to recover some bits of the passengers of an air crash but not the dual black boxes. Why is it so suspicious that they were unable to recover the boxes in this particular instance?
 
AHAHHHAHA A blender? A blender that pulverizes? In one pass?

Oh, god, make me stop answering ... please.

Did you happen to notice the comments about EVERYTHING (desks, chairs, file cabinets, computers, etc.) that was in those offices, except the strucural elements, that went thru the collapse?

"Tiny pieces."
"Nothing recognizable."
"Nothing larger than a phone dial."

Yeah. In 1 pass. One 800' long pass.

Sorry, my bad. I just hadn't hit "ignore" yet.

There. Set. You're good to go, Clayton.

Have fun.
 
Fancy having to go no planer rather than admit to a mistake. Have you ever known a truther to admit to a mistake? I haven't.

I've known ergo to admit to minor errors. Never major ones, though, even when he's been proved completely wrong. He just wriggles harder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom