the science obviously goes against 9/11 truth in all areas and completely proves that it was not a controlled demolition.
however, there is still that 1 in a 10^trillion*10^trillion*10^trillion or whatever magnificently large number chance that it was controlled demo however a bunch of random calculations came out perfect on that day to eliminate all evidence of controlled demo.
So it has already been proven that 9/11 cannot be proven to be an inside job with science.
So is there any other way to prove that 9/11 is an inside job or are twoofers like me screwed?
i guess the ONLY way would be if 10 or 15 people actually went public and said "I helped rig the buildings for demolition". If that happened, and if those people were actually special ops demolition crew members, would you say that proves it? or would that not be enough evidence?
here is the big "yes or no question":
if 15 special ops demolition crew members went public and said "I helped rig the buildings for demolition" , that would prove it was an inside job?
its a yes or no question
EDIT: QUESTION HAS BEEN UPDATED
here is the new "yes or no question":
if 15 special ops demolition crew members went public and said "I helped rig the buildings for demolition" and it was found out that those confessions were credible, would that be evidence that could be used in court to prove it was an inside job assuming more evidence of "other people being involved" was found and used with it too?
its a yes or no question
however, there is still that 1 in a 10^trillion*10^trillion*10^trillion or whatever magnificently large number chance that it was controlled demo however a bunch of random calculations came out perfect on that day to eliminate all evidence of controlled demo.
So it has already been proven that 9/11 cannot be proven to be an inside job with science.
So is there any other way to prove that 9/11 is an inside job or are twoofers like me screwed?
i guess the ONLY way would be if 10 or 15 people actually went public and said "I helped rig the buildings for demolition". If that happened, and if those people were actually special ops demolition crew members, would you say that proves it? or would that not be enough evidence?
here is the big "yes or no question":
if 15 special ops demolition crew members went public and said "I helped rig the buildings for demolition" , that would prove it was an inside job?
its a yes or no question
EDIT: QUESTION HAS BEEN UPDATED
here is the new "yes or no question":
if 15 special ops demolition crew members went public and said "I helped rig the buildings for demolition" and it was found out that those confessions were credible, would that be evidence that could be used in court to prove it was an inside job assuming more evidence of "other people being involved" was found and used with it too?
its a yes or no question
Last edited: