9/11: The Smoking Gun

Just checking in to see if anyone has mentioned the actual evidence mentioned in the video yet, the 8 progressively worse damaged columns, and the inward blasting hole, but also the smoking gun. I don't need to read the thread to know no one has.
 
yankee451 said:
Just checking in to see if anyone has mentioned the actual evidence mentioned in the video yet, the 8 progressively worse damaged columns, and the inward blasting hole, but also the smoking gun. I don't need to read the thread to know no one has.
Click to expand...
You can't debunk Radar, never will... you can't debunk the video evidence, never will. Your legacy of a crazy claims define your mocking the murder of thousands will lies based on lack of knowledge.

You have no evidence. You have an opinion based on BS, and debunked by Flight 11 and Flight 175 when they hit the WTC Towers.

You must of missed the video evidence, Radar evidence.

It takes massive willful ignorance to ignore the Radar and Video data which debunk your delusional fantasy of missiles.

What a legacy for your family to see online, a conspiracy theorist's fantasy world of woo.

Your claim of evidence, is a delusion.
 
yankee451 said:
Just checking in to see if anyone has mentioned the actual evidence mentioned in the video yet, the 8 progressively worse damaged columns, and the inward blasting hole, but also the smoking gun. I don't need to read the thread to know no one has.
Click to expand...

fonebone? Any comment?
I'm asking because you, too, have an alternative theory of what happened on 9/11, which is quite different from yanke451's. It might be interesting if you guys compared notes.
 
Cosmic Yak said:
fonebone? Any comment?
I'm asking because you, too, have an alternative theory of what happened on 9/11, which is quite different from yanke451's. It might be interesting if you guys compared notes.
Click to expand...

If those two ever started comparing notes on line, I would be whizzing down to my local supermarket and buying out their entire stock of popping corn as well as a second popcorn maker!!
 
smartcooky said:
If those two ever started comparing notes on line, I would be whizzing down to my local supermarket and buying out their entire stock of popping corn as well as a second popcorn maker!!
Click to expand...

If yankee451 thinks his claim of missile formations is correct, he should be able to convince fonebone.
Equally, if fonebone's CD claim is correct, he should be able to sway yankee451.
This is especially true given that both of them have characterised themselves are open-minded seekers of truth.

Oh, and I don't do popcorn, but I'll get the nachos in, should this debate ever happen! :)
 
Why isn't Ukraine getting a supply of these hyper-accurate ultra-stealthy cruise missiles? They're a decades-old design so surely it makes sense to use up old stocks.
 
yankee451 said:
The evidence discussed in this video leads directly to the most likely cause, and the most likely suspects, which is probably why it was banned almost immediately on YouTube and Facebook.

The inescapable conclusion is that multiple cruise missiles were launched in broad daylight on 9/11. How they faked the videos is irrelevant to what the physical evidence shows.

This is forensice examination of the evidence we all have access to, but to discuss it is forbidden. I have tried to do just that on this very site in the past, so I'm under no illusions as to how long this post will remain here. Watch it quickly, while you can. 14.29 minutes.

9/11: The Smoking Gun
https://vimeo.com/741646536
Click to expand...


Your link to a Vimeo video returns the following message...


Sorry, we couldn’t find that page

Make sure you’ve typed the URL correctly, or try searching Vimeo. You could also watch one of the videos below instead.
Click to expand...


Someone didn't like Yankee451's evidence.
 
yankee451 said:
The evidence discussed in this video leads directly to the most likely cause, and the most likely suspects, which is probably why it was banned almost immediately on YouTube and Facebook.

The inescapable conclusion is that multiple cruise missiles were launched in broad daylight on 9/11. How they faked the videos is irrelevant to what the physical evidence shows.

This is forensice examination of the evidence we all have access to, but to discuss it is forbidden. I have tried to do just that on this very site in the past, so I'm under no illusions as to how long this post will remain here. Watch it quickly, while you can. 14.29 minutes.

9/11: The Smoking Gun
https://vimeo.com/741646536
Click to expand...


Your link to a Vimeo video returns the following message...
https://vimeo.com/741646536
Sorry, we couldn’t find that page

Make sure you’ve typed the URL correctly, or try searching Vimeo. You could also watch one of the videos below instead.
Click to expand...


Someone didn't like Yankee451's evidence.
 
yankee451 said:
The evidence discussed in this video leads directly to the most likely cause, and the most likely suspects, which is probably why it was banned almost immediately on YouTube and Facebook.

The inescapable conclusion is that multiple cruise missiles were launched in broad daylight on 9/11. How they faked the videos is irrelevant to what the physical evidence shows.

This is forensice examination of the evidence we all have access to, but to discuss it is forbidden. I have tried to do just that on this very site in the past, so I'm under no illusions as to how long this post will remain here. Watch it quickly, while you can. 14.29 minutes.

9/11: The Smoking Gun
https://vimeo.com/741646536
Click to expand...


Your link to a Vimeo video returns the following message...
https://vimeo.com/741646536
Sorry, we couldn’t find that page

Make sure you’ve typed the URL correctly, or try searching Vimeo. You could also watch one of the videos below instead.
Click to expand...


Someone didn't like Yankee451's evidence.
Fonebone said:
Your link to a Vimeo video returns the following message...
https://vimeo.com/741646536



Someone didn't like Yankee451's evidence.
Click to expand...
 
yankee451 said:
A YT friendly version - same thing, but will less naudet.
https://youtu.be/JYXHWiwu0DU
Click to expand...

I watched that link.

Seems to me they spend a lot of time trying to figure out what could have made the "plane sized hole"...

"Faking the plane for the media is the easy part" according to the link.

The hard part is using the correct "missile" to make a convincing "plane sized hole".

They did rule out artillery though.
 
Cosmic Yak said:
Do you like his evidence?
Click to expand...

Seeing DBB, on Physorg explained this too the Truthers in 2007 and they are still using drag effects an metal bending as evidence is comical.
The Aluminum they used as evidence is double bent, meaning it was bent inwards on Impact then the Heat caused air to expand in the building and bend it back outward with the steel colum behind it showing the wing sheered the steel.
Obviously we are not dealing with the Brightest people in the Truther Comunity.
 
yankee451 said:
Just checking in to see if anyone has mentioned the actual evidence mentioned in the video yet, the 8 progressively worse damaged columns, and the inward blasting hole, but also the smoking gun. I don't need to read the thread to know no one has.
Click to expand...

Since this was addressed on Physorg in 2007 By David Banes Benson, why is it Important now in a double bent piece of aluminum Sheet, with a steel column sheered behind it?

Drag and Preasure effects would be seen in the Impact and Fuel air blasts, expected and explained almost 20 years ago.
 
Ok I haven't been following the 911 ftap for some time so I'm late to the game here.
Nobody has ever answered this even once.
Assuming the NOC path according to the witnesses and the plane flew past the pentagon, where did the plane go? Flying that low to the ground should have rattled windows and scared the jeepers out of anyone because obviously full throttle jet engines are LOUD!
Where are these witnesses? Where is the radar records for that day since it happened right beside a major airport? Where are any pilots who might have seen a big jet rumbling along at near ground level?
Where did that jet land because it can't use some out of the way regional airport. You can't hide a plane that size even at a military airport.

CIT were the dumbest investigators ever and why people take two of the three stooges seriously is beyond me.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom