• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

It's a reinforced concrete wall, designed to protect nuclear installations! Notice how the plane is shredding but looks intact further aft.
 
Disgust is an interesting emotion. It's a basic emotion that stems from the vomit response to tainted food. There are people who are prone to disgust, including vegans, intensely religious people, and the morally hypervigilant.

You apply disgust to the search for 9/11 truth, focusing on reported individuals inside planes. Any discussion of no planes elicits a disgust response from you.

I wonder why you keep dipping into the 9/11 cookie jar, if it makes you want to throw up. Ease up on yourself. If you don't like what you see, don't look.

I wonder why you keep swallowing crap.
 
You clearly don't compare notes with Jammonious. He didn't like that footage at all, calling it 'fubar' without elaborating (of course). Note that the jet doesn't bounce of the wall. In fact the only significant difference between the video you posted and the videos of the South Tower impact is the amount of debris splaying as impact progresses: a lot at the reinforced wall that the jet cannot penetrate, almost none at the WTC wall that the plane did penetrate. Khrist, don't you *get* that?

There's nothing like a good old fashioned self-debunking.
 
What's this "plane" you're all talking about? I see no evidence of a plane hitting a concrete wall in Dusty's video.

Dave

Indeed..everyone knows planes don't ride on train tracks. It must be a hologram covering up a handcar, being pumped by 2 NWO agents. And did anyone notice all the dust and fumes!?
 
Last edited:
Any force applied in this direction ---> has an associated force <--- paired with it..

Well that's just not true.

If I were to take out a pistol and shoot you, would the force from your skin stop the bullet from breaking it and injuring you?

If I stamp on an egg, the egg has a force that pushes upwards. Is that enough to destroy my boot?
 
We do. Bigger hole, bigger building, bigger fire, more damage due to increased speed.......



Oh my jesus christ on a pogo stick, what the ****?

Yeah, they haven't changed much at all.....we're still using propeller planes with regular aluminum skin.......Jet propulsion must still be in it's infancy.....

Hmmm

http://www.aerospaceweb.org/question/history/empire-state-building/b25_01.jpg

Nice...


http://www.aerospaceweb.org/aircraft/jetliner/b767/b767_02.jpg

Wow so alike!

:rolleyes:
 
Hey Dusty, how about you stay in some of the other threads you've started, yeah? I've asked oyu a question multiple times in one of them and you just keep ignoring it.

I'm not expecting you to actually ever answer it, but it would be good if you did.
 
Where's the wake? If there's no wake there's no plane! This is obviously disinfo. This is a government video and therefore fake. What you are seeing is a train crash, but with a hologram of a fake plane superimposed. It's really just poor CGI.

Everyone knows that trains run on tracks not fragile airboats.
 
From Jude the Mental's site.

''I do not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.''

Pardon?

It means, "Everyone is lying, even the ones who are telling the truth!"
 
A growing group among truthers is suspecting that the CDers are Government Truthbots trying to discredit the opposing side through methods of "cognitive infiltration"

From what I can tell, each distinct segment of the Truther population thinks the rest of them are sooper-sekrit COINTELPRO agents. It's actually rather amusing to watch them eviscerate each other.
 
Nevermind, I see the whole thing went right over your head...



Does this surprise you? An unwillingness to acknowledge that words sometimes have more than one meaning, or shades of meaning, is pretty standard amongst the CT types. They're simply not very good at dealing with ambiguity.
 
It might sound snobby, but if you don't have extensive training
in science, then I won't believe that you've taken the time and
done the work that is required to understand Judy Wood.

I can't even say I like the woman personally, but you don't see me
disrespecting her because I understand in outline what she is
talking about, and it is interesting and very solid science.

I have [extensive training in science], and my brief visit to her site to find out what all these posts regarding Judy Wood are all about, I found no evidence of solid science to speak of. Seems like a crackpot to me.
 
Check out the video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25vlt7swhCM

We should have seen a similar impact at the south face of WTC 2, had one occurred.
No evidence of impact? No impact. No impact? No plane.


Was the South face of the WTC2 towers a solid wall of 5 foot thick reinforced concrete? No? Then why would expect the crashes to look the same? Also tanks on that Phantom were filled with water not fuel.

That video by the way is one of the best for debunking the Pentagon no planers........I assume you are not one of them and keep your "no planes" to the WTC towers?
 
I watched the infamous Greg Jenkins video again recently, just for the lulz.

Her response to being asked if she sees debris falling in a photograph?

"If someone left a penny on the windowsill maybe that"

That's not the exact quote word for word though.

Truther he may be but even Jenkins thought she was insane.
 
Was the South face of the WTC2 towers a solid wall of 5 foot thick reinforced concrete? No? Then why would expect the crashes to look the same? Also tanks on that Phantom were filled with water not fuel.

That video by the way is one of the best for debunking the Pentagon no planers........I assume you are not one of them and keep your "no planes" to the WTC towers?

No, she just ignores the Pentagon completely.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom