Disgust is an interesting emotion. It's a basic emotion that stems from the vomit response to tainted food. There are people who are prone to disgust, including vegans, intensely religious people, and the morally hypervigilant.
You apply disgust to the search for 9/11 truth, focusing on reported individuals inside planes. Any discussion of no planes elicits a disgust response from you.
I wonder why you keep dipping into the 9/11 cookie jar, if it makes you want to throw up. Ease up on yourself. If you don't like what you see, don't look.
What's this "plane" you're all talking about? I see no evidence of a plane hitting a concrete wall in Dusty's video.
Dave
I wonder why you keep swallowing crap.
Any force applied in this direction ---> has an associated force <--- paired with it..
We do. Bigger hole, bigger building, bigger fire, more damage due to increased speed.......
Oh my jesus christ on a pogo stick, what the ****?
Yeah, they haven't changed much at all.....we're still using propeller planes with regular aluminum skin.......Jet propulsion must still be in it's infancy.....
From Jude the Mental's site.
''I do not believe that our government is responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01; nor do I believe that our government is not responsible for executing the events of 9/11/01.''
Pardon?
A growing group among truthers is suspecting that the CDers are Government Truthbots trying to discredit the opposing side through methods of "cognitive infiltration"
Nevermind, I see the whole thing went right over your head...
It might sound snobby, but if you don't have extensive training
in science, then I won't believe that you've taken the time and
done the work that is required to understand Judy Wood.
I can't even say I like the woman personally, but you don't see me
disrespecting her because I understand in outline what she is
talking about, and it is interesting and very solid science.
Check out the video.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=25vlt7swhCM
We should have seen a similar impact at the south face of WTC 2, had one occurred.
No evidence of impact? No impact. No impact? No plane.
Was the South face of the WTC2 towers a solid wall of 5 foot thick reinforced concrete? No? Then why would expect the crashes to look the same? Also tanks on that Phantom were filled with water not fuel.
That video by the way is one of the best for debunking the Pentagon no planers........I assume you are not one of them and keep your "no planes" to the WTC towers?