Merged 9/11 No Plane/Energy Weapon discussion thread

[Dash80]

Glad you bring this up. The exterior of the plane was photographed sticking outside the ESB.

The whole plane? I recall the very tail end wedged in the hole yes but are you saying the entire plane was completely intact?

It wasn't, try again.

It penetrated the building, parts of it emerged out the other side.

It did not splat against the facade like a fly.

It was also much smaller and traveling around half the speed of the planes that hit the WTC. The structural design of the ESB should also be considered. A conventional steel frame and masonry design. The WTC had open space beyond the facade, nothing more to stop the momentum of the shredding aircraft. Until the core columns that is, and many of those were destroyed or damaged.

This is basic stuff even I can understand! I don't even have a PhD and I get it! Why can't you?

 

[Dash80]

Wrong. If you take conservation of momentum seriously, as I do, you cannot agree with the hijack conspiracy.

I struggle to believe you take anything seriously.

 

[alienentity]

A DEW storm!



Seriously though, I think Dusty has had way too much exposure to "fumes"

There is some scientific evidence of cognitive impairment due to longterm Cannabis abuse.

'Recent studies with improved methods have demonstrated changes in cognition and brain function associated with long-term or frequent use of cannabis. Specific impairments of attention, memory, and executive function have been found in cannabis users in the unintoxicated state (and in children exposed to cannabis in utero ) in controlled studies using brain event-related potential techniques6 ,and neuropsychological assessments including complex tasks.'

Cannabis may also contribute negatively to cases of psychosis, according to several studies.

 

[Legend]

if the planes were there for the impac and then disappeard then it must've been dust.

 

[Bell]

*looks up from filing her nails to see if you have said anything remotely interesting, like providing any evidence*

Nope, just repeating yourself, nothing new.

*goes back to filing nails*

Why are you filing your nails? I want to see you in a cat fight with WTC Dust

 

[Sunstealer]

Dusty is gonna have to go on ignore soon for my own sanity.

I can't understand why people are bothering to reply to her insane postings. She clearly isn't interested in what people post just that they make a response. Narcissistic Personality Disorder is the most likely diagnosis.

The Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders fourth edition, DSM IV-TR, a widely used manual for diagnosing mental disorders, defines narcissistic personality disorder (in Axis II Cluster B) as:[1]

A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthood and present in a variety of contexts, as indicated by five (or more) of the following:

• Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)
• Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty, or ideal love
• Believes that he or she is "special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)
• Requires excessive admiration
• Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatment or automatic compliance with his or her expectations
• Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends
• Lacks empathy: is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others
• Is often envious of others or believes others are envious of him or her
• Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors or attitudes

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Narcissistic_personality_disorder

Dusty in a nutshell.

 

[alienentity]

I said that almost nobody knew about them (nukular weapons) until after they were deployed.

That's a useless scientific claim. The community of physicists (is that nobody?) certainly knew all about the splitting of the atom.
That is a fact. Your statement tries to imply the opposite.

As of 2012, the scientific community does not know of any physics which support Judy Wood's 'molecular dissociation' claptrap.

The only research Dr Wood has referenced are the experiments of Canadian John Hutchison. His work is not only unpublished, it hasn't even been duplicated anywhere that we know.

Nor is there a scientific theory to explain the Hutchison effect. There is however some pseudo-scientific nonsense invoking vague electromagnetic forces.
But I can get that kind of crap from my chiropractor or acupuncturist. Maybe someone misaligned the Chakras of the twin towers to bring them down? Maybe they disrupted the flow of Chi in them? Maybe the holographic planes hit acupressure points in the towers and caused them to fail?
LOL.

Judy Wood claims that, in the presence of a Tesla coil and some radio interference you can cause metal to dissociate. OK, prove it, I say.

Prove it.

 

[JimBenArm]

Nobody is talking about the Deutsche Bank, except me.
Nobody is talking about The Sphere, except me.
Nobody is mentioning the multiple types of metallic foam, except me.
Nobody is talking about the lack of a wake at 9:03AM, except me.
Nobody is talking about the smell of the WTC fumes and the duration of these fumes, except me.
Nobody is talking about the rain days in NYC, except me.

Dr. Wood is talking about some of the same things that I talk about, but she focuses on different things, like the magnetosphere.

Nobody can do The Shimmy like I do.
Nobody can do The Skate like I do.
Nobody can do The Boogaloo like I do.
Nobody can do The Philly like I do.

Nobody, nobody, nobody, nobody.

 

[Edx]

http://defense-update.com/20060525_thor-ied.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon
http://www.defensemedianetwork.com/...tract-aids-kratos-defense-restructuring-plan/

What do you all think of these energy weapons? One thing that can be concluded is that they exist. Energy weapons exist. They really do.

The odd one out is the picture of the WTC since no energy weapons you posted or will ever find can do that to a building in any way.

 

[tsig]

It's not confusion. Smoke, as it is commonly understood, results from combustion. I specifically use fumes because combustion wasn't going on. To call it smoke would be to imply combustion, and I'm doing the exact opposite. I am refuting combustion as the source of the fumes.

Remember, after 100 days of smelling it, I swore that nobody would ever convince me that it was an ordinary fire.

So your nose knows?

There are other senses you know.


ETA: have you ever tried to use this forensic smelling ability in other cases?

Your card could read:

Have nose, will travel.

 

[jaydeehess]

Not to mention that there was a very large difference in speed and mass between a B-25 and a B767. That’s why the crew of the B-25 got out and took the elevator down.

Unfortunately as did the other engine. Well, it used the elevator shaft destroying that elevator and killing the occupants IIRC.

 

[Dash80]

Why are you filing your nails? I want to see you in a cat fight with WTC Dust

She might "foamify" me...

 

[jaydeehess]

Glad you bring this up. The exterior of the plane was photographed sticking outside the ESB.

What would the conservation of momentum/conservation of energy laws say once you consider the fact that the entire B-25 had less mass than the fuel load of the 767 alone.
What does CoM/CoE indicate once you consider the fact that the WTC towers face, by surface area, consisted of more glass, and no masonry in comparison to the ESB?

 

[dafydd]

Glad you bring this up. The exterior of the plane was photographed sticking outside the ESB.

No. It wasn't. Wrong again but you are not trying to be right, are you?

 

[jaydeehess]

We have videos that depict the object at a time point AFTER it is said to have impacted the WTC, but before it disappears inside the building.

No evidence of a plane crash is found in the video evidence. No evidence of a plane is seen if you look at pictures of the holes, either. Finding plane parts a few blocks away or a few miles away doesn't change this.

The plane (well its constituent parts) were mostly INSIDE the building. Those that were not were found at various distances from the buildings. There are pictures of the parts that continued through the buildings and there are none of the parts that were inside the buildings. Care to guess why no one took pictures of the parts within the buildings WTCDust? Could it possibly be that these parts within the building were mostly on floors on which the largest fires were, and that those people who did get out and survive 9/11/01 did not stop to take cell phone pictures because they were using all their mental and physical faculties to save their own lives?

Does it take a Ph.D in anything to grasp this concept? I think not.

 

[WTC Dust]

Physics.

A complete understanding of the universe has not yet been declared by even the brightest of physicists.

 

[Dash80]

The plane (well its constituent parts) were mostly INSIDE the building. Those that were not were found at various distances from the buildings. There are pictures of the parts that continued through the buildings and there are none of the parts that were inside the buildings. Care to guess why no one took pictures of the parts within the buildings WTCDust? Could it possibly be that these parts within the building were mostly on floors on which the largest fires were, and that those people who did get out and survive 9/11/01 did not stop to take cell phone pictures because they were using all their mental and physical faculties to save their own lives?

Does it take a Ph.D in anything to grasp this concept? I think not.

No it doesn't. I don't have a Ph.D in anything and I understand perfectly.

The last thing I'd be doing is hanging around on or near those impact floors taking photos, I would be trying to get the hell out of there. I expect it is and was the same for most people.

 

[twinstead]

No it doesn't. I don't have a Ph.D in anything and I understand perfectly.

The last thing I'd be doing is hanging around on or near those impact floors taking photos, I would be trying to get the hell out of there. I expect it is and was the same for most people.

I think that is what he was saying...

 

[plague311]

A complete understanding of the universe has not yet been declared by even the brightest of physicists.

Glad that level of understanding isn't required to figure out 9/11

 

[leftysergeant]

Drywall doesn't do quite that. Fumes rising when nobody appears to be disturbing the contents of the dump truck. Very strange. Similar to these pictures and news story.

Nothing at all strange about it. A good deal of the debris outside the footprint of the towers was pulverised drywall. If you just dump a whole lot of simply broken pieces into a dumpster, it will raise a dust cloud that will not settle in less than half an hour on a calm day.

It is highly likely that the dumpster in the photo was filled with scoop-up drywall powder. There is a fairly brisk wind blowing across it, thus producing the uniform height of the dust for the full length of the dumpster.

This wind is, of course, stirring up further dust from the bottom.