alienentity
Illuminator
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2009
- Messages
- 4,325
BTW I do want to clarify that the basic claims put forward by both Dr Wood and Dr Blevins are fraudulent, in my opinion. The fact is that massive amounts of structural steel were removed from the WTC site - to claim otherwise is a lie, to avoid quantifying the actual amounts is deceptive, to make a claim for which there is no actual evidence is dishonest.
I can't think of a more dishonest approach to analyzing the tower collapses, using this as a starting point.
Perhaps the no-plane claims of Jammonius et al. come very close, but I think dustified or foamified disappearing steel is about as dishonest as it gets.
It's time for these people to 'fess up that it's all been a hoax, or face continued ridicule and scorn for pushing such fraudulent and guanophrenic ideas on the public.
ETA While reminded of the 'God in the gaps' arguments made by creationists, I would point out that the ideas of Dr Blevins and Dr Wood do not even rise to the level of 'DEW in the gaps' because there is no gap!
The steel was not turned to dust or foam, and it didn't disappear magically - it was collected and transported. End of story.
I can't think of a more dishonest approach to analyzing the tower collapses, using this as a starting point.
Perhaps the no-plane claims of Jammonius et al. come very close, but I think dustified or foamified disappearing steel is about as dishonest as it gets.
It's time for these people to 'fess up that it's all been a hoax, or face continued ridicule and scorn for pushing such fraudulent and guanophrenic ideas on the public.
ETA While reminded of the 'God in the gaps' arguments made by creationists, I would point out that the ideas of Dr Blevins and Dr Wood do not even rise to the level of 'DEW in the gaps' because there is no gap!
The steel was not turned to dust or foam, and it didn't disappear magically - it was collected and transported. End of story.
Last edited:

