9/11: How they Faked the Videos

How do you figure?

If a plane could do this, you would try to explain it.

[qimg]https://911crashtest.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/South-Tower-Close-up-with-notations-1024x640.png[/qimg]

The plane actually flew into the building. That's how I would explain it. It even made a plane shaped hole.
 
The plane actually flew into the building. That's how I would explain it. It even made a plane shaped hole.

Once again, dear reader, the Television trumps common sense, as well as the physical evidence. So strong is the mind control tool called Television.
 
Logically it makes no sense for the perpetrators to...

:i:

Start with "shoot missiles and fake videos when they could just fly planes into the buildings".

Go on with "try and convince thousands of people of collaborating in a huge mass murder".

Continue with "expect that NO ONE, ABSOLUTELY NO ONE be filming at the time of the 2nd impact" (lest the missiles or the explosion without a plane be caught on camera).

I could go on, but it's insane enough just with that for starters
 
Once again, dear reader, the Television trumps common sense, as well as the physical evidence. So strong is the mind control tool called Television.


Smh. What about the people filming with handheld video cameras? Did they film something that wasn't there and then the G-men showed up at their doorstep and took their film away? And then replaced it with CGI? Your theory is just silly.
 
Funny, because from what I can tell, it's been kicking Skeptic butt.

Comedy Gold:



The sad thing is that you actually your believe what you're posting, and it's sadder still that in your pov is that a plan of action conceived by religious fundamentalists and carried out by 19 disposable humans can't be true but a fantasy construct based in science fiction and (at a minimum) of thousands is true.

I met one of your intellectual cousins irl last year:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=340162

What is it with CTists in general and 9/11 wingnuts in particular that they must always reject reality for fantasy? Are their perceptions so delusional that they require a fantasy of their own creation ?
 
Smh. What about the people filming with handheld video cameras? Did they film something that wasn't there and then the G-men showed up at their doorstep and took their film away? And then replaced it with CGI? Your theory is just silly.

Any real witness that caught a photo or video of the explosion would be able to verify their images with the images of the explosions in the public record, and would simply assume they missed the plane. But even if someone did see what really happened, and still didn’t get the clue that the authorities were at fault, where would that someone turn if they wanted to report it? To the police that planted the plane parts? To the fire department that set fire to the cars? To the media that broadcast fraudulent video? To the government that was about to declare war on the world? Even if they did report the truth, why would the authorities tell we the people when they were selling us a terrorist attack?
https://911crashtest.org/9-11-truth-what-could-have-cut-the-plane-shaped-hole/
 
Comedy Gold:



The sad thing is that you actually your believe what you're posting, and it's sadder still that in your pov is that a plan of action conceived by religious fundamentalists and carried out by 19 disposable humans can't be true but a fantasy construct based in science fiction and (at a minimum) of thousands is true.

I met one of your intellectual cousins irl last year:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=340162
.

What is it with CTists in general and 9/11 wingnuts in particular that they must always reject reality for fantasy? Are their perceptions so delusional that they require a fantasy of their own creation ?


Yes, and you actually believe what you saw on television, simply because you saw it on television. That doesn't bode well for the gene pool
 
We all have access to the same information. That doesn't change. That you refuse to use the same photographs of the impact holes we all have access to to explain how they do not support my conclusions, and instead, better support yours, tells me you aren't interested in an honest debate. Instead you offer one evasion after another, ending with a false dichotomy.
I am using the same photographs as well you know.

So much for your alleged "honesty"
 
Last edited:
Yes, and you actually believe what you saw on television, simply because you saw it on television. That doesn't bode well for the gene pool

I believe what I saw because after having been around in various places since the 1970's and having lived in garden spots like Lebanon and Saudi in the early 1980's and having almost become a grease spot from what we now call IED's .

I know that there are folks that are happy to kill and die for their religious delusion.

I also know and have posted in this thread a detailed account of crimes committed by U.S. service members where other service members came forward to report the crimes and in some cases threatened to stop the actors from continuing the crimes with violence.

You live in a science fiction world where this is an inexhaustible pool of socio & psychopaths that will simple salute and bend to the work when ordered by "They" That. Is. Not. The. Real. World.

The world isn't a comic book. You may have a comic book universe in your head but the world doesn't begin to work the way you assert - you are stating flat out that a plan involving religious idiots and hijacking is too incredible to believe and some up with the cluster **** of a no-plane theory? The P.G & E. CTist in the thread I started was an Icke fanboy - which nut job have you hitched your wagon to? Maybe you're just a lone wolf CTist.
 
I believe what I saw because after having been around in various places since the 1970's and having lived in garden spots like Lebanon and Saudi in the early 1980's and having almost become a grease spot from what we now call IED's .

I know that there are folks that are happy to kill and die for their religious delusion.

I also know and have posted in this thread a detailed account of crimes committed by U.S. service members where other service members came forward to report the crimes and in some cases threatened to stop the actors from continuing the crimes with violence.

You live in a science fiction world where this is an inexhaustible pool of socio & psychopaths that will simple salute and bend to the work when ordered by "They" That. Is. Not. The. Real. World.

The world isn't a comic book. You may have a comic book universe in your head but the world doesn't begin to work the way you assert - you are stating flat out that a plan involving religious idiots and hijacking is too incredible to believe and some up with the cluster **** of a no-plane theory? The P.G & E. CTist in the thread I started was an Icke fanboy - which nut job have you hitched your wagon to? Maybe you're just a lone wolf CTist.

Few people are as indoctrinated as military people.
 
The impact evidence proves the videos were faked. Using them as proof of something is a circular argument.

False the impact evidence shows a large object caused an Aluminum oxidation event so they are consistent with the videos until you explain in your theory how that occured.
 
Few people are as indoctrinated as military people.

Stereotypes aren't your friend.

Watch the series "Leavenworth" for a look inside how the real world works: It does'nt feature superheros so you might need to watch it more than once to get it.

https://www.starz.com/us/en/series/45100/episodes?season=1

“Leavenworth” is based on the controversial true story of Clint Lorance, a former lieutenant serving a 19-year sentence for murder at the United States Penitentiary, Leavenworth.

Fresh screwy Lt. orders troops to fire on unarmed civilians, two casualties, what happens next? His platoon immediately reported the incident, testified at trial, LT convicted of murder, later the numb-nuts-in-chief pardons him and two other service members.

He was guilty as hell, but the platoon Sgt. and the EM's did the right thing..
 
But even if someone did see what really happened, and still didn’t get the clue that the authorities were at fault, where would that someone turn if they wanted to report it? To the police that planted the plane parts? To the fire department that set fire to the cars? To the media that broadcast fraudulent video? To the government that was about to declare war on the world? Even if they did report the truth, why would the authorities tell we the people when they were selling us a terrorist attack?
To the public on the internet, where they can do it anonymously?

No such thing has happened after 18 years. Don't you expect someone by now would have already screamed foul? Especially given that the 9/11 conspiracy theories are known worldwide?

Keep digging.
 
Few people are as indoctrinated as military people.
so you don't want people to swear to support and defend the Constitution? Why are you unpatriotic to those who faithfully serve?

And you have been in the military? I doubt it.

Yes, we are indoctrinated, and here is what we are indoctrinated with...
I, [name], do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office on which I am about to enter. So help me God.

What is your oath of office,... to lie and mock the murder of thousands?

I was on active duty on 9/11. It appears you are bias against your fellow Americans who serve in the US Military. Why is that?
 
To the public on the internet, where they can do it anonymously?

No such thing has happened after 18 years. Don't you expect someone by now would have already screamed foul? Especially given that the 9/11 conspiracy theories are known worldwide?

Keep digging.

Read what you're commenting on again.
 

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom