Nothing ...
From the article:
The actual tapes of the FAA communications are still around. The tapes were them talking about 911. The real evidence is still on tape, just the controllers accounts on tape were destroyed. The controllers can still talk about what they said.
These tapes are after the fact stuff, not the actual communications with the jets, the FAA tapes of aircraft communication were not destroyed.
The article speaks for itself and says nothing important.
"Accounts of", not the actual communication tape.
"Accounts of" does not mean the FAA tapes of the communications with the aircraft were destroyed, it means the tapes of the controller talking about 911 were destroyed. Not real time evidence from 911.
This is a non story, it is BS piece to spark controversy over not much after reading the article.
Someone quickly looking at the article may think 911 taped communication with the planes were destroyed; Those communications are still on tape and available.
The tapes are not important since the controllers still presented their written testimony and are able to talk about 911. This is a no issue 911Truth failure.
Maybe the "Washington Post" was fishing for a story, and failed. They must miss the Watergate Pulitzer Prize feeling!
Someone else can say this better; jump in!
