Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

[jhunter1163]

Dr. King's dream may not have come true, but it is a giant step closer today.

 

[Brainache]

Yes. Congratulations America. It's about time you guys did something that didn't make the rest of the world think you were a bunch of idiots. Because I'm telling you, if McCain and Palin had won that election, the rest of the world would have, once again, had an excuse to feel smugly superior. Well done.

 

[Baylor]

Yes. Congratulations America. It's about time you guys did something that didn't make the rest of the world think you were a bunch of idiots. Because I'm telling you, if McCain and Palin had won that election, the rest of the world would have, once again, had an excuse to feel smugly superior. Well done.

Do you mean there's something wrong with our education system? How wrong you are. Just look at the brilliant, articulate, and always scientifically-sound posts of Homeland Insurgency.

 

[eromitlab]

Anyone seen any new 9/11 opinion polls? Thanks in advance.

http://www.newsmeat.com/news/meat.p...&channelId=2951&buyerId=newsmeatcom&buid=3281
That was an outfit called worldpublicopinion.org doing a poll in other countries about who was to blame for 9/11... that came out about four months ago. That's the most recent poll I've seen.
http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?t=123292

 

[Brainache]

Do you mean there's something wrong with our education system? How wrong you are. Just look at the brilliant, articulate, and always scientifically-sound posts of Homeland Insurgency.

I've just been re-reading The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan, I wish Homeland Insurgency would do the same.

 

[Hokulele]

... Just look at the brilliant, articulate, and always scientifically-sound posts of Homeland Insurgency.

I would rather spend the next 10 hours listening to Sarah Palin lecture on the economic impact of alternative energy with respect to futures trading in the overseas markets.

 

[bonavada]

I've just been re-reading The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan, I wish Homeland Insurgency would do the same.

I have an unabridged audiobook of this. It really is an excellent educational work for scepticism. I'm sure he would have had great fun demolishing the myths and junk that surround the events of 9-11.

BV

 

[Brainache]

I have an unabridged audiobook of this. It really is an excellent educational work for scepticism. I'm sure he would have had great fun demolishing the myths and junk that surround the events of 9-11.

BV

I imagine he would have been pretty happy with the election result as well.

I think it was through him that I first learned about James Randi and the MDC.

 

[JoeyDonuts]

I would rather spend the next 10 hours listening to Sarah Palin lecture on the economic impact of alternative energy with respect to futures trading in the overseas markets.

Stop this, now. Otherwise someone's going to run with it and then we'll be a nation of vehicles powered by moose crap.

 

[T.A.M.]

I've just been re-reading The Demon Haunted World by Carl Sagan, I wish Homeland Insurgency would do the same.

I have an unabridged audiobook of this. It really is an excellent educational work for scepticism. I'm sure he would have had great fun demolishing the myths and junk that surround the events of 9-11.

BV

excellent book. I have read it 3 times. Highly, HIGHLY, recommended.

TAM

 

[funk de fino]

If Flight 77 did indeed fly over the Pentagon and continue on elsewhere, then why didn't Barbera Olsen and Renee May not phone again and say "we missed"?

Would one of the CIT cheerleaders like to explain this?

 

[Bell]

If Flight 77 did indeed fly over the Pentagon and continue on elsewhere, then why didn't Barbera Olsen and Renee May not phone again and say "we missed"?

Would one of the CIT cheerleaders like to explain this?

If I'm right, that was not the real AA77 (the real one was flown somewhere else and the passengers killed). Olson's husband (sorry, forgot his name) lied about the phonecalls, no phonecalls were ever made.

 

[Baylor]

So naturally, they assume the "fake phone call voice morphing technology" of the early trutherisms.

 

[Bell]

So naturally, they assume the "fake phone call voice morphing technology" of the early trutherisms.

No, according to one of the PfT/CIT fanboys Olson flatout lied. He never spoke to Barbara. Not twice, not once... never. He lied about talking to his loved one being aboard that doomed plane. Offcourse this implies that he is part of the plot.

I'm at work right now, with a slowish connection. But I'll try to dig up that post by one of the PfT/CIT fanboys where he called Olson a liar.

 

[Bell]

Found it allready! Who else but Roundhead could have made this outrageous post?

The 9/11 Commision INCORRECTLY implied/lied that the 4 "unknown" connected calls involved Barbara Olsen, and her lying husband Ted.

However, lying Ted himself said there were only two calls, so either the Commision or Ted is lying regarding this 2/4 calls point. They cant both be true.

At the ZM trial,it was stated 4 calls were made, all from an UNKNOWN CALLER.

The ONLY CALL said at the trial to be made by her lasted ZERO seconds.


The easiest thing to conclude here, it that when you constantly lie, its not easy to make a story square.

The fact is, at the Government trial, ZERO evidence was offered that Barbara and her lying husband ever uttered a single word to each other.

It would be mighty easy to grab DOJ records which without a doubt would have showed those connection, had they ever been made.

Pretty basic stuff, if you want to prove calls were connected, you grab the phone records and see if in fact the calls were made, and present them as unassailable evidence.

They were not shown, so the FACT is, they dont exist, those two never spoke. If they did, kindly show me the phone records which MUST THEN exist.

 

[MikeW]

Found it allready! Who else but Roundhead could have made this outrageous post?

It's an increasingly common truther tactic: make a statement, then claim it's true unless you can prove otherwise, so neatly reversing the burden of proof.

 

[RedIbis]

It's an increasingly common truther tactic: make a statement, then claim it's true unless you can prove otherwise, so neatly reversing the burden of proof.

You mean like NIST's magic column 79 theory?

 

[MikeW]

You mean like NIST's magic column 79 theory?

No. Not like that at all.

 

[funk de fino]

You mean like NIST's magic column 79 theory?

Progressive collapse is not magic but a well known problem that has occured many times in the past.

Are you going back to the McQueen and Szamboti paper thread you started?

 

[T.A.M.]

You mean like NIST's magic column 79 theory?

Straw meet Man, Man meet Straw.

TAM