• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

Merged 9/11 CT subforum General Discussion Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.
One video that keeps popping up when "explosives" are discussed -- particularly when anyone asks why we don't hear any during the collapses -- is this one:

MurrayWBroadway0.jpg



Usually, this is attributed to explosions at WTC 7, but I've never been able to find out when and where the video was shot. But one version I found on YouTube had a comment mentioning Broadway and Murray. Using the "street view" photos in Google maps, I've found that phone booth: It's on the north side of Murray, just west of West Broadway:

MurrayWBroadway1.jpg


MurrayWBroadway2.jpg


When the camera turns and shows another fireman approaching from east on Murray, we can see that the sun is almost directly behind him:

MurrayWBroadway3.jpg


Using the sun position calculator on the Naval Observatory website, we can tell when the sun was in that approximate position on 9/11/2001 in NYC:

Astronomical Applications Dept.
U.S. Naval Observatory
Washington, DC 20392-5420

NEW YORK, NEW YORK
o , o ,
W 73 55, N40 44

Altitude and Azimuth of the Sun
Sep 11, 2001
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
o , o ,
W 73 55, N40 44

Eastern
Standard
Time Altitude Azimuth (E of N)
...
09:00 37.0 121.5
09:10 38.6 123.9
09:20 40.2 126.5 <---
09:30 41.7 129.1
09:40 43.1 131.9
09:50 44.5 134.7 <---
10:00 45.8 137.8
...

The table gives Eastern Standard Time, but NYC was on Daylight Savings Time on 9/11, so the video was probably shot sometime between 10:20 AM and 10:50 AM. In other words, it was probably shot between the times that WTC2 and WTC1 collapsed, or it may have been somewhat after WTC1 collapsed -- perhaps even during the collapse, and what we hear is WTC 7 getting hit with debris. Of course, WTC 7 collapsed some 7 hours later. I don't know what that sound was (or if it's been faked), but we are certainly not hearing the "explosives" that caused the "sudden onset of free-fall" in WTC7 (some 1.75 seconds after the whole building was already falling).
 
Last edited:
One video that keeps popping up when "explosives" are discussed -- particularly when anyone asks why we don't hear any during the collapses -- is this one:

[qimg]http://opendb.com/images/MurrayWBroadway0.jpg[/qimg]

I can see why this video would confuse people, it really sounds like an explosion. Wouldn't debris hitting WTC7 occur during the collapse of WTC1? (which would also be audible?)
I might have played too much GTA, but might it be something as simple as a burning car's gas tank exploding?
 
One video that keeps popping up when "explosives" are discussed -- particularly when anyone asks why we don't hear any during the collapses -- is this one:

[qimg]http://opendb.com/images/MurrayWBroadway0.jpg[/qimg]


Usually, this is attributed to explosions at WTC 7, but I've never been able to find out when and where the video was shot. But one version I found on YouTube had a comment mentioning Broadway and Murray. Using the "street view" photos in Google maps, I've found that phone booth: It's on the north side of Murray, just west of West Broadway:

[qimg]http://opendb.com/images/MurrayWBroadway1.jpg[/qimg]

[qimg]http://opendb.com/images/MurrayWBroadway2.jpg[/qimg]

When the camera turns and shows another fireman approaching from east on Murray, we can see that the sun is almost directly behind him:

[qimg]http://opendb.com/images/MurrayWBroadway3.jpg[/qimg]

Using the sun position calculator on the Naval Observatory website, we can tell when the sun was in that approximate position on 9/11/2001 in NYC:

Astronomical Applications Dept.
U.S. Naval Observatory
Washington, DC 20392-5420

NEW YORK, NEW YORK
o , o ,
W 73 55, N40 44

Altitude and Azimuth of the Sun
Sep 11, 2001
NEW YORK, NEW YORK
o , o ,
W 73 55, N40 44

Eastern
Standard
Time Altitude Azimuth (E of N)
...
09:00 37.0 121.5
09:10 38.6 123.9
09:20 40.2 126.5 <---
09:30 41.7 129.1
09:40 43.1 131.9
09:50 44.5 134.7 <---
10:00 45.8 137.8
...

The table gives Eastern Standard Time, but NYC was on Daylight Savings Time on 9/11, so the video was probably shot sometime between 10:20 AM and 10:50 AM. In other words, it was probably shot between the times that WTC2 and WTC1 collapsed, or it may have been somewhat after WTC1 collapsed -- perhaps even during the collapse, and what we hear is WTC 7 getting hit with debris. Of course, WTC 7 collapsed some 7 hours later. I don't know what that sound was (or if it's been faked), but we are certainly not hearing the "explosives" that caused the "sudden onset of free-fall" in WTC7 (some 1.75 seconds after the whole building was already falling).

ummm

Doesn't the "Corner Gourmet" have 43-XX Broadway on its sign?

Would that not make this phone booth on Broadway?

just asking?

TAM:)
 
ahh, I see, the corner gourmet, is on the "corner" between W. Broadway and Murray. I have looked at the 3d view from ground level, and your location of this phone is correct.

TAM:)
 
nice peice of work. Even without the sun positioner, clearly from the location of the phone booth, its orientation with the street, and the position of the shadow (in front of him), of the new fireman coming from the east, the sun is still well in the east, which means it is no where mid day at that point.

Nice.

TAM:)
 
I did a couple of pages. As far as I'm aware all the initial filtering by forum members has been done and Mark is working on the filtered set now.

Dave



Well, last I heard, Gravy was in the process of moving to a new city, so while I'm sure he'll finish this project, we probably shouldn't expect it right away.
 
yup...it was a good effort, and it kind of gives a one liner to them when they bring it up.

"what, oh that video with loud explosions occuring in the morning, yah, I doubt that was WTC7, since it didnt collapse until 5 or so."

TAM;)
 
yup...it was a good effort, and it kind of gives a one liner to them when they bring it up.

"what, oh that video with loud explosions occuring in the morning, yah, I doubt that was WTC7, since it didnt collapse until 5 or so."

TAM;)

Wrong again!!

WTC7 was indeed blown up (or pulled it) in the morning. It just took a while for the building to understand what happened to it.

Something with the laws of physics being out of wack that day.
 
Wrong again!!

WTC7 was indeed blown up (or pulled it) in the morning. It just took a while for the building to understand what happened to it.

Something with the laws of physics being out of wack that day.
Yeah, instead of Schroedinger's Cat, it's Schroedinger's Building. We didn't know if it collapsed or not until it was pulled, or something. Yeah, that sounds all science-ey and everything. That's what happened!
 
maybe that explosion was caused by one of the ebil NWO explosive planters dropping one of "da charges" while they were rigging "da building" to blow.

TAM;)
 
maybe that explosion was caused by one of the ebil NWO explosive planters dropping one of "da charges" while they were rigging "da building" to blow.

TAM;)

Waiting for a Horatius cartoon to show us what happened to that NWO explosive planter :)
 
Waiting for a Horatius cartoon to show us what happened to that NWO explosive planter :)

I don't recall WTC having planter boxes installed outside the windows, much less explosive ones. I guess that would explain how they were able to keep it unnoticed - Just replace the potting soil with explosives.
 
It seems that prisonplanet has found the 64th "smokin gun!!!!11!" from that attack they don't ordinarily say much about... the Pentagon.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/video-surfaces-of-911-commissioner-referring-to-missile-at-pentagon.html
At prisonplanet, they have apparently "discovered" a video "from the last anniversary of 9/11" in where 9/11 Commission member Tim Roemer (inadvertently?) refers to the Pentagon being "pried open by a missile" before saying "an airplane" a moment later. At least it gives them a chance to throw the "Rumsfeld told Parade Magazine it was a missile" chestnut out there again.
prisonplanet "discovered" the video because it was posted two days ago (by a user whose avatar is a logo for WAC Vancouver) as part of this clip that they link in the article:

The clip starts with the Roemer quote (from CNN American Morning, 8:12am Eastern) and goes on to feature a few of the other assorted "slip-ups", when the likes of Bush and Rumsfeld find themselves unable to lie 24/7/365 (366 in a leap year) and accidentally tell little snippets of the truth about the massive government plot to pull off 9/11... and only those highly attuned truthists can pick up the difference, at which point they string them together, set them to music and include a plug for pseudodocumentaries of a similar bend on Google video.

But what don't they tell you in this video, is how long these words have been out there, heretofore uncited (and subsequently beaten half-to-death) as "proof" that a missile hit the Pentagon. Sure, the prisonplanet article says that it originated "from the last anniversary of 9/11", in an article posted today. So that must mean it came from 9/11/2008... right? Well, if you watched American Morning on 9/11/2008 at 8:12am Eastern, and you don't remember seeing this, are you crazy?

No, you're not.
One search of youtube led me to another instance of this particular clip.

The above clip, of just that little bit with Roemer and nothing added to it, has been sitting on youtube's servers, being viewed approximately thirty-five times a day, since December 4th.
2006.
The info on the video even says it: 9/11/2006.

Not content with telling one big lie in the prisonplanet piece, Watson goes on:
Steve Watson @ the prisonplanet said:
Rumsfeld also keeps a piece of the supposed flight 77 on his desk as a reminder of the attacks. He once infamously referred to the grisly souvenir as “a piece of the missile” that hit the Pentagon.
To support this, they link to this Redorbit article that says the following in re this claim:
The final investigatory report said the Justice Department inspector general confirmed Rumsfeld "has a piece of the airplane that flew into the Pentagon." The Associated Press obtained a copy of the report Friday.
So... they're obviously not counting on someone looking at their linked citation to see that they made the part about the missile up. So honest, they are. Unless, of course, they're tossing that bit from redorbit and Rumsfeld's Parade Magazine quote into ol' Tyranny Blender 1 in the break room, mixing them together, then reconstituting them into this particular instance to say that Rumsfeld referred to the piece of the plane as a piece of the missile.

I guess this bit belongs best in this thread. Or I suppose there could be a new general discussion thread in the main CT section, for a general assemblage of outright lies and fabrications from the Alex Jones family of websites.
 
When I saw Gage last September he tried to say that video (of the 'explosion') was of WTC 7 right before it collapsed, and people next to me believed it.

wow just wow
 
Last edited:
It seems that prisonplanet has found the 64th "smokin gun!!!!11!" from that attack they don't ordinarily say much about... the Pentagon.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/video-surfaces-of-911-commissioner-referring-to-missile-at-pentagon.html
At prisonplanet, they have apparently "discovered" a video "from the last anniversary of 9/11" in where 9/11 Commission member Tim Roemer (inadvertently?) refers to the Pentagon being "pried open by a missile" before saying "an airplane" a moment later. At least it gives them a chance to throw the "Rumsfeld told Parade Magazine it was a missile" chestnut out there again.
prisonplanet "discovered" the video because it was posted two days ago (by a user whose avatar is a logo for WAC Vancouver) as part of this clip that they link in the article:

The clip starts with the Roemer quote (from CNN American Morning, 8:12am Eastern) and goes on to feature a few of the other assorted "slip-ups", when the likes of Bush and Rumsfeld find themselves unable to lie 24/7/365 (366 in a leap year) and accidentally tell little snippets of the truth about the massive government plot to pull off 9/11... and only those highly attuned truthists can pick up the difference, at which point they string them together, set them to music and include a plug for pseudodocumentaries of a similar bend on Google video.

But what don't they tell you in this video, is how long these words have been out there, heretofore uncited (and subsequently beaten half-to-death) as "proof" that a missile hit the Pentagon. Sure, the prisonplanet article says that it originated "from the last anniversary of 9/11", in an article posted today. So that must mean it came from 9/11/2008... right? Well, if you watched American Morning on 9/11/2008 at 8:12am Eastern, and you don't remember seeing this, are you crazy?

No, you're not.
One search of youtube led me to another instance of this particular clip.

The above clip, of just that little bit with Roemer and nothing added to it, has been sitting on youtube's servers, being viewed approximately thirty-five times a day, since December 4th.
2006.
The info on the video even says it: 9/11/2006.

Not content with telling one big lie in the prisonplanet piece, Watson goes on:

To support this, they link to this Redorbit article that says the following in re this claim:

So... they're obviously not counting on someone looking at their linked citation to see that they made the part about the missile up. So honest, they are. Unless, of course, they're tossing that bit from redorbit and Rumsfeld's Parade Magazine quote into ol' Tyranny Blender 1 in the break room, mixing them together, then reconstituting them into this particular instance to say that Rumsfeld referred to the piece of the plane as a piece of the missile.

I guess this bit belongs best in this thread. Or I suppose there could be a new general discussion thread in the main CT section, for a general assemblage of outright lies and fabrications from the Alex Jones family of websites.

Great debunking of Alex's bunk! I posted this info on the related Myspace bulletin Alex pumps out, let's see if it stays!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom