9/11 Conspirators - Naming Names, List included

[SDC]

Of course you won't. I wouldn't either if I lacked the evidence and feared libel and slander liability. That is a very smart decision!

And, for the record, I wasn't enticing you to frivolously accuse someone of murder. I was merely encouraging you to disclose those whom you've discovered who are complicit in the 9/11 attacks. But if you don't have any such evidence, and are just relying on the "evidence" you've heard from Alex Jones, or read on an internet web page, well, that's cool too. You ever wonder why Alex Jones never names a specific person in connection with 9/11? It's because he's smart like you.

Mince, at least here in the US, it is almost impossible to slander/ libel (in a legal sense) a public figure or official. One assumes that R.Ibis has someone such in mind.

So he/ she (R.) is just playing cute'n'coy, most likely.

 

[dbalsdon]

They want a new one, because they're not happy with the 911 commission report, the NIST report, expert opinion, and they have no common sense.

 

[JimBenArm]

Well, I, for one, am extremely impressed with our twoofer friends moral courage. First, one refuses to name names because he might get tossed off JREF, and now another because, well, just because!

Never mind they are enabling conspirators in mass murder to go scott free! Someone might be mean to them! It might actually cost them something! They might not get to post here! Oh, I have the vapors!

What a bunch of wusses!

 

[RedIbis]

Mince, at least here in the US, it is almost impossible to slander/ libel (in a legal sense) a public figure or official. .

Exactly. For one thing, Michael Ruppert named Cheney as the "maestro" of 9/11 and made lots of money off the book and his website. Strange that no one sued him for slander or libel.

And I was specific about my challenge to TAM, even though he decided to address his challenge to "truthers," which is beneath him. If he or anyone else knows their research, it should not be hard to name a very prominent official who neglected his responsibilities on 9/11 and arguably, could be charged with very serious crimes.

 

[uk_dave]

Exactly. For one thing, Michael Ruppert named Cheney as the "maestro" of 9/11 and made lots of money off the book and his website. Strange that no one sued him for slander or libel.

And I was specific about my challenge to TAM, even though he decided to address his challenge to "truthers," which is beneath him. If he or anyone else knows their research, it should not be hard to name a very prominent official who neglected his responsibilities on 9/11 and arguably, could be charged with very serious crimes.

ahhhhhhhhh himmmmmm.

I see.
Interesting

 

[JimBenArm]

Exactly. For one thing, Michael Ruppert named Cheney as the "maestro" of 9/11 and made lots of money off the book and his website. Strange that no one sued him for slander or libel.

And I was specific about my challenge to TAM, even though he decided to address his challenge to "truthers," which is beneath him. If he or anyone else knows their research, it should not be hard to name a very prominent official who neglected his responsibilities on 9/11 and arguably, could be charged with very serious crimes.

Yet you won't name him. Why is that?
I'm not buying the excuses you've given so far.

 

[SDC]

Exactly. For one thing, Michael Ruppert named Cheney as the "maestro" of 9/11 and made lots of money off the book and his website. Strange that no one sued him for slander or libel.

Trimmed by me to the first part.

Wait a minute. I said it is almost impossible for an official in the US to be legally slandered/ libelled; certainly a VP. I've never heard of a case at that level (some local cases, though).

Noww you seem to pretend to agree with me ("Exactly"). But then in the second sentence you veer off to suggest that because Cheney didn't sue Ruppert, this is suspicious and indicates that Cheney is guilty of something.

Don't try to put words in my mouth. Don't try to use my comments as support for yours. It isn't honest, fair, or decent. It isn't even smart.

 

[Stellafane]

TAM,
Your list is incomplete. Somehow you left off the name of the one person who was in a position to thwart the attacks but abdicated that responsibility.

Moi?

 

[RedIbis]

Trimmed by me to the first part.

Wait a minute. I said it is almost impossible for an official in the US to be legally slandered/ libelled; certainly a VP. I've never heard of a case at that level (some local cases, though).

Noww you seem to pretend to agree with me ("Exactly"). But then in the second sentence you veer off to suggest that because Cheney didn't sue Ruppert, this is suspicious and indicates that Cheney is guilty of something.

Don't try to put words in my mouth. Don't try to use my comments as support for yours. It isn't honest, fair, or decent. It isn't even smart.

You're making a series of assumptions here. I did not suggest that Cheney's lack of a suit was suspicious. Regardless of the validity of the charges, such accusations are not actionable, even when the author, Ruppert as the example, makes money off of such claims.

 

[dbalsdon]

I did not suggest that Cheney's lack of a suit was suspicious.

Strange that no one sued him for slander or libel.

Who else would've sued on Cheney's behalf???

 

[bje]

Corey Rowe called in from the brig. He wasn't sure who to pick so he said just to use this week's winning Arkansas lotto numbers:

 

[Drudgewire]

You're making a series of assumptions here. I did not suggest that Cheney's lack of a suit was suspicious. Regardless of the validity of the charges, such accusations are not actionable, even when the author, Ruppert as the example, makes money off of such claims.

Great, so no worries naming the guy missing from the list then.

 

[Stellafane]

...I won't indulge these attempts to get me to accuse someone of murder.

Behold the 9/11 Truther Movement. All too eager to anonymously accuse hundreds of people of one of the most evil acts in human history, based on misplaced pixels and faulty reasoning. But when pressed, they won't even identify a single individual by name! What is that, exactly? Is it because naming a person (as opposed to a faceless group or institution) is too, you know, real?? And that would open the possibility of allowing reality to come in and evaporate your collective little fantasy -- a sick, demented, pathetic little fantasy to be sure, but it's all you guys got, right?

I could call 9/11 CTers every synonym for "stupid" I have at my disposal within my fairly extensive vocabulary, and it wouldn't even begin to do justice to how ridiculous their own words make them look.

 

[Mince]

Exactly. For one thing, Michael Ruppert named Cheney as the "maestro" of 9/11 and made lots of money off the book and his website. Strange that no one sued him for slander or libel.

Soooooo... Since slander or libel is no fear for you, please then provide your list of perpetrators with their specific crimes that you've acquired through your exhaustive research, lest you give the appearance of aiding and abetting violent criminals.

Thank you in advance.

 

[Slayhamlet]

Red has at last scraped the very bottom of the barrel. How sad.

 

[uk_dave]

Awww c'mon, y'all know who Red is talking about....

Short, funny looking guy, talks with a limp and walks with a stutter.... always wears a shirt..... he's married to that woman, you know...the one with the hair and the wooden eye...

.....c'mon....it's obvious.

 

[A-Train]

You have inexplicably omitted the name of then Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff from your list.

I think more of us should make ourselves familiar with the life and career of this fascinating government servant and Israeli citizen. Did you know, for example, that Mike was right in the very mix of things the last time the WTC towers were blown up by a bunch of jihadists in 1993?

Then, on 9/11, he was Johnny-on-the-spot once again, rushing to the FBI command center and acting as the senior Justice Dept. official overseeing the government's response on that awful day. He was the one who so promptly drew up the list of the 19 evil doers, and presented it to the public well before the shock & trauma had begun to wear off.

He bravely proceeded to carry out his duties directing the FBI in its investigation of the crime, making sure, for example, that all evidence was properly taken care of. And today, we can all sleep soundly at night knowing that Mr. Chertoff, as head of the Department of Homeland Security, is doing all he can to protect us from whatever the forces of Radical Islam are planning to do to us next.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4173

 

[SDC]

You have inexplicably omitted the name of then Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff from your list.

http://sp1.mm-a4.yimg.com/image/2959529629

I think more of us should make ourselves familiar with the life and career of this fascinating government servant and Israeli citizen. Did you know, for example, that Mike was right in the very mix of things the last time the WTC towers were blown up by a bunch of jihadists in 1993?

Then, on 9/11, he was Johnny-on-the-spot once again, rushing to the FBI command center and acting as the senior Justice Dept. official overseeing the government's response on that awful day. He was the one who so promptly drew up the list of the 19 evil doers, and presented it to the public well before the shock & trauma had begun to wear off.

He bravely proceeded to carry out his duties directing the FBI in its investigation of the crime, making sure, for example, that all evidence was properly taken care of. And today, we can all sleep soundly at night knowing that Mr. Chertoff, as head of the Department of Homeland Security, is doing all he can to protect us from whatever the forces of Radical Islam are planning to do to us next.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4173

You forgot Ben Chertoff, his evil twin brother. (Or is Ben the "good" twin? I get confused.)

Just for curiosity's sake, A, is a non-Jew ever guilty of anything?

 

[uk_dave]

Just for curiosity's sake, A, is a non-Jew ever guilty of anything?

Well of course, silly. 'Not hating jews enough' is a capital offence to A-Train.

 

[Mince]

You have inexplicably omitted the name of then Assistant Attorney General Michael Chertoff from your list.

http://sp1.mm-a4.yimg.com/image/2959529629

I think more of us should make ourselves familiar with the life and career of this fascinating government servant and Israeli citizen. Did you know, for example, that Mike was right in the very mix of things the last time the WTC towers were blown up by a bunch of jihadists in 1993?

Then, on 9/11, he was Johnny-on-the-spot once again, rushing to the FBI command center and acting as the senior Justice Dept. official overseeing the government's response on that awful day. He was the one who so promptly drew up the list of the 19 evil doers, and presented it to the public well before the shock & trauma had begun to wear off.

He bravely proceeded to carry out his duties directing the FBI in its investigation of the crime, making sure, for example, that all evidence was properly taken care of. And today, we can all sleep soundly at night knowing that Mr. Chertoff, as head of the Department of Homeland Security, is doing all he can to protect us from whatever the forces of Radical Islam are planning to do to us next.

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=4173

Hmmmmm. I don't see how this is evidence of complicity in the 9/11 attacks. Oh wait. You know what? Because it isn't. So I'm not missing anything. Whew.

However, Mr. Train, if you actually do have evidence Mr. Chertoff was complicit in the 9/11 attacks, please, let's hear it, lest you give the appearance that you're aiding and abetting a violent felon.