• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

8 out of 8 at Citgo station

911kongen

Critical Thinker
911kongen
Joined
Jul 6, 2008
Messages
363
.. says that flight 77 had a different flight path ? Whats the source on this one.. can not find it!:boggled:
 
Seriously 911Kongen...don't even waste a minute of your life on CIT. They're absolutely, certifiably bonkers.
 
Wow. 8 out of 8. That's better than the 4 out of 5 dentists who recommend sugarless gum for their patients who chew gum!

Sorry. Had to do it.
 
It's another exercise in special pleading for the twoofers.

The witnesses interviewed by the Crap Instigation Team also affirm that flight 77 hit the Pentagon.

Ranke and Marquis routinely tie themselves into knots over this.
 
8 out of 8 people they decided to put in their video agree with them, surprising, no?
 
They (twoofer) say its 8 out of 8 people at the Citgo station. So who are they? One is named Williams Lassede or something like that... the other 7 is?
 
911kongen said:
They (twoofer) say its 8 out of 8 people at the Citgo station. So who are they? One is named Williams Lassede or something like that... the other 7 is?
Click to expand...

9K, you're kind of an odd kid. But if you're serious, I will answer as best I can.

I don't know of any 8 Citgo witnesses claim at all. There's no explanation or links here so far. There are three main Citgo witnesses anyway, the original cast of Impossible North Path Impact: The Non-Musical.
1) DPS Sgt. William Lagasse - first round with Eastman - second round with CIT
2) DPS Sgt. Chadwick Brooks was in a parking lot quite near the Citgo, but not quite at it. Close enough.
3) Robert Turcios - discovery by CIT - video corroboration he lied to them

100% of these Citgo witnesses, which are the only ones I know of, do say the plane was North of The Citgo. Whhoooopty dooo, words. Find 8, or 66, I don't care. Its like putting feathers on a scale balanced with a stack of bricks. Seriously. For all the reasons I'm too tired of reiterating.
 
Caustic Logic said:
100% of these Citgo witnesses, which are the only ones I know of, do say the plane was North of The Citgo. Whhoooopty dooo, words. Find 8, or 66, I don't care. Its like putting feathers on a scale balanced with a stack of bricks. Seriously. For all the reasons I'm too tired of reiterating.
Click to expand...


Long story short, Caustic Logic thinks that all those witnesses are planted in a huge disinfo operation anyway.
 
Who are the 8? I only know of two who were at the Citgo. One was leaning in his car and the other ran inside after pooping on himself. Please source the other 6, I'd really like to hear their accounts.
 
This just in - sometimes people on the internet are wrong.

ETA - you didn't click my link above, did you?

Here is Shirley Hughes "agreeing" with CIT.

CIT: Listen, because of the evidence we have, we know that the plane did not hit the building and continued on.
SHIRLEY: Yeah
CIT: Excuse me?! Yeah what?
SHIRLEY: What you said.
CIT: What did I say?
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Childlike Empress said:
Long story short, Caustic Logic thinks that all those witnesses are planted in a huge disinfo operation anyway.
Click to expand...

Long story short, CIT thinks that all those 100's of South Side Witnesses, the debris, the DNA, the various flight path data, the damage pattern, the CIT's own witnesses testimony that the god damn plane hit the freaking Pentagon, etc, were planted in a huge disinfo operation anyway.

Thanks CE! You make it insanely easy to debunk those ****ing morons!
 
911kongen said:
.. says that flight 77 had a different flight path ? Whats the source on this one.. can not find it!:boggled:
Click to expand...

Ah yes....a few people think that the plane was on a different approach path...yet they all still agree that it hit the pentagon.

That's like a few people claiming that the man who robbed the bank came from a different direction...it doesn't change the fact that they saw him rob the bank.
 
There goes 16.5. Always the same people popping up in these threads. "Funny" Craig Ranke photoshops in 3, 2, 1,...

@BCR: You're right - first the bunk, then the debunk ;)

Here's the latest CIT presentation. Regardless of ones opinion of their argument, they do an excellent job in presenting it. First the claim, then the evidence. No spooky music. I don't know the minutiae of it, but seem to remember that "8 Citgo witnesses" is not correct. They have more like four or five directly at the station, but all in all we are talking about more than a dozen witnesses corroborating a flightpath north of the gas station. Most if not all of them were not able to see the impact.

"National Security Alert"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom