8 out of 8 at Citgo station

[Childlike Empress]

I've seen an excellent animation of AA 77, the Boeing 757 which flew into the Pentagon on 9/11/2001, pointing out each pole and equipment on the ground it struck, but can't find it.
As to -your- debunking of anything, dumbesilleh.

I posted that animation two or three pages ago. You don't pay attention and should stop participating if you aren't willing to check who is lying here. Which is very easy to do.

As to Mr. Debs: The TruthSims like to pose as progressives to build up credibility capital.

 

[Childlike Empress]

btw, to the guys who came up with the F-4 video: If the plane turned into a rain of debris that dissappeared before it hit the ground ... then how did it create the "exit hole" on the C-Ring of the Pentagon? Hmm?

 

[Childlike Empress]

"Exit hole", light poles. They define the angle of the flight path to a fraction of a degree. No wiggle room.

 

[DGM]

"Exit hole", light poles. They define the angle of the flight path to a fraction of a degree. No wiggle room.

[qimg]http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a327/lytetrip/Pentagon/flight%20path/AllGroupsMap.jpg[/qimg]

Your right. So why are you talking about a path(s) that is no where near this line?

 

[Childlike Empress]

Your right. So why are you talking about a path(s) that is no where near this line?

Because that's what all witnesses in a position to judge report.

Still no SoC witness (= reporting the plane on the NTSB path from a position to judge).

 

[DGM]

Because that's what all witnesses in a position to judge report.

Still no SoC witness (= reporting the plane on the NTSB path from a position to judge).

And how exactly did you determine all the others were not in a "position to judge"? This goes along the same line as how did you determine what part of the "testimony" to ignore.

 

[Childlike Empress]

And how exactly did you determine all the others were not in a "position to judge"? This goes along the same line as how did you determine what part of the "testimony" to ignore.

I asked you to come up with one of "the others". You failed and will fail again because there aren't any "others".

 

[Thunder]

you know, the whole idea that people can remember exactly where the plane was, as it was coming in at a fast fate of speed, is pretty silly.

who pays attention to such things?

who remembers such things, years later?

 

[I Ratant]

After just a couple years trying to keep my head out of the filth in the JFK conspiracy sewer, I left those benighted souls to founder in their own sewage, and it goes there today.
The same deluded types of minds fester in the 9/11 sewer.
It's sad they never come up for air, but continue to recycle their own filth, in a neverending cacophany of lunatic claims and fantasies only seriously disturbed people could possibly embrace.
Ewwwwwwwwwww!
"There was no plane, and all these people north of Citgo saw it!"
Yougottabeshittinme!

 

[Childlike Empress]

you know, the whole idea that people can remember exactly where the plane was, as it was coming in at a fast fate of speed, is pretty silly.

who pays attention to such things?

who remembers such things, years later?

Nobody claims that any of them EXACTLY remembers where the plane flew. That's why you see a bunch of yellow lines like drawn by them on the overview. And that's why the guy with the fabricated Morin/Middleton controversy failed so badly. And beachnut with his dirt dumb "none of the paths were possible".

The CORROBORATION is what enables us to say with confidence that the plane flew over the Navy Annex and between the cemetery and the CITGO station. Most of the witnesses were on record in 2001/2002 already with the same stories, btw. You would know that if you had followed the thread/topic.

 

[Childlike Empress]

After just a couple years trying to keep my head out of the filth in the JFK conspiracy sewer, I left those benighted souls to founder in their own sewage, and it goes there today.
The same deluded types of minds fester in the 9/11 sewer.
It's sad they never come up for air, but continue to recycle their own filth, in a neverending cacophany of lunatic claims and fantasies only seriously disturbed people could possibly embrace.
Ewwwwwwwwwww!
"There was no plane, and all these people north of Citgo saw it!"
Yougottabeshittinme!

Yo, go somewhere else before you start breaching your MA. You obviously can't handle the truth.

 

[beachnut]

Because that's what all witnesses in a position to judge report.

Still no SoC witness (= reporting the plane on the NTSB path from a position to judge).

No, the witnesses point to 77 flying, they can't define a ground track from their vantage point. If you say they can you are failed; but you failed. Paik points south, you have clue, CIT are morons, etc.

Not a single flight path you posted is possilbe except the official flight path. If you deny that fact, you are math and physics free. As in debunked.

Please tell me which flight path you posted is the one and only flight path. Which one? If you can't give a NoC flight path from all the ones you have what good are you?

Here are your yellow flight paths which are impossible to fly due to g-loading, something you can't comprehend; indicative of your accepting the moronic lies of CIT.


Hunt the CIT flight path! Which flight path is it. The official flight path is backed up with RADAR from multiple RADARs, the FDR, and physical evidence. Which flight path is it? Pick one, there can only be one! One, Please. This is funny, you have no clue what physics is, and you have no clue you posted flight paths, not a flight path. Make your day, post your idiotic flight path and post another lie.

 

[Childlike Empress]

Wow, who is that giant witness on your overview? With that height he must have had a good outlook, i think. What does he report?

 

[achimspok]

I asked you to come up with one of "the others". You failed and will fail again because there aren't any "others".

Morin, Zackhem, Storti, Lagasse and every single one on the highway.

Where are Morins trees?

Do you admit that the plane hit the building if every one say so? Or do you defend the flyover theory?

Something about the exit hole: Imagine some gigantic shot gun and a cloud of several thousand projectiles fast enough to "shoot down" walls. Would you say the projectiles at the outer edge of that cloud will be decelerated and distracted first? If not, why not? If yes, what do you think is the most probable pattern for an exithole at the end of that funnel effect? Is it a star or a heart or a flower or a square?

 

[Thunder]

"There was no plane, and all these people north of Citgo saw it!"

yes!!!!!

 

[Childlike Empress]

Give it up, Achim. Credibility capital used up.

 

[achimspok]

The most interesting thing about the yellow lines:
Every single one bowed the line towards his own vantage point.
Lagasse painted it close to the canopy.
The cementery workers close to their service buildings.
Middleton painted it north of the Annex close to where he was.
Paik saw it through the window...

...and later draw it above the roof of his shop.

I'm afraid, a psychologist might interprete those yellow lines in a much more appropriate way.

 

[sheeplesnshills]

No. I would have to check it in detail and suspect it would turn out that CIT reported honestly and you guys made up **** like it always turned out so far. But i'm not going to do it because it doesn't matter. The plane crosses Columbia Pike and flys over Paik's shop means it wasn't on the NTSB path, regardless of the question if Paik was in his shop or outside..

Yes, I suggest you go check Then thats one subject at least where you can stop showing your ignorance. There is video, pictures everything. Paik was no where near where CIT has him and cannot have had any clear idea of the route other than he thought it hit the VDOT mast (ie well over the other, south, side of the Pike.)

 

[beachnut]

Give it up, Achim. Credibility capital used up.

Childlike, Chomsky, I mean achimspok thinks the Pentagon is a big nonsensical conspiracy, but he is too afraid to define his delusion. At least you try to support a defined nut case theory, while achimspok hides his idiotic delusions.

Keep up the good work CE, at least I think I known your delusion. You have many flight paths, you can't pick one, and then 77 flew over the Pentagon, missed by the video I have, which does not show the flyover, and you have to have planted tons of aircraft parts, and dead people who match those who boarded 77 that morning. Good for you.

The official story of terrorists taking planes, planes a kid could fly, and crashing into buildings is too complex to be real for you and the CIT experts. You like fantasy, you spew it. Good for you.

 

[Childlike Empress]

The most interesting thing about the yellow lines:
Every single one bowed the line towards his own vantage point.

Which explains why both Morin and Middleton report it closer to themselves as it really flew. Seeing a "bad ass" (Prather) plane flying right in front of your nose isn't an every day experience. Prather btw drew the line that goes straight over the Annex and then immediately starts to "bank". Go watch him draw it - he was aware of the topography. He drew how it "sank" down the hill. An excellent witness.