I percieve that something awful will occur that day. An attack on a Western target (UK, USA, Europe).
Did an attack on a Western Target occur? No
Cleopatra: For the sake of people you must give it another try and be more specific.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Luci : I wish I could, Cleopatra. However, I can only report what I percieve.
So his original prediction was all the information he could give. Until...
I understand, but I can only provide what I percieve. The 'awful' aspect of the perception seemed to project over 100 casualties (death or serious injury). I really hope I am wrong. But the perception was strong.
Suddenly more information came up. "Over 100 casualties". This is something easily measured. Though still very vague.
I have already said that the perceptions are often vague, it is the fact that significant repeated correlations occur over time that warrant the recording. To juts have one correlation is perhaps lucky. But I have been able to do this over many occasions.
You heard it here first, he's been able to predict events like the one that failed to happen on Aug 4th "over many occasions".
I accept you may see that as 'vague'. But attacks with over 100 casualties like that are not, thankfully, every day events.
Nor were they the events of yesterday.
I perceive a Western target as one controlled / operated / symbolic of the Western forces of power - armed / industrial / social.
Which is just about everywhere, with the possible
possible exception of the moon.
Thankfully, the CIA, FBI, DIA, MI5 etc pre-empted any attack planned for the 4th August with the unprecedented heightened security on major Western targets.
I've searched the news and have yet to mind any mention of "any attack planned for the 4th August". Nor do I find the "heightened security" to be "unprecedented". Unprecedented would be if we had this type of security before 9/11. What we have right now is on par with the threat level.
In addition, on the 4th August, MI5 managed to arrest up to 12 terrorists in the UK who were planning an attack on Heathrow.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/ "more from the UK: doubt over airport 'terror plot'"
They are not claiming the caught the suspects in the act of committing an attack. If they did I'm sure it would be front-page news. They said he was
planning an attack.
Like the 'Ladybrook' perception, it seems that attacks may not necessarily take place
Allot of things "may not necessarily take place". Forgive me for not being impressed.
they may be thwarted either by intelligence tip-offs, or other action taken between the time of perception and the planned time of the attack
Even if someone did tip them off, there would be nothing they could do based on your prophecy. Do you think they read your post and immediately scrambled to send as many men they could to every potential "Western Target" they could think of?
Obviously, the intelligence reports from the major agencies have proved that attacks were planned for this time,
Nope reread the BBC news. They were not "planned for this time", they were, if anything, planning at that time.
I have percieved 19th September as another high risk window for similar attacks and hope and pray that the intelligence agancies agian act to thwart such an attack.
THERE WAS NO ATTACK! Are you saying that on Sept 19th there won't be an attack again?
The unprecedented heightened security over the last few days has undoubtably been good for the protection against such attacks. The UK arrests foiled at least one attempt. The heightened security in the US and elsewhere would have undoubtable thwarted any other attacks planned for this time.
Everyone know that security has been drastically heightened this week as a result of the intelligence community working together.
Shouldn't your prediction have taken into account the "unprecedented heightened security over the last few days". It was not a result of you prediction, and hence should have been easily foreseen in your prediction.
If the CIA. FBI, DIA, MI5 etc had not enforced heightened security on western targets over this time, then that would suggest that an attack by terrorists against a western target was not a risk.
Of course its a risk. It’s been a risk for a long time. It will be a risk for a long time to come. I predict they will probably heighten security just about every time they get info of a threat. Not info from some lunatic on a web site, but from real intelligence like they did in this case.
Due to the action of the intelligence community, and everyone knows the positive action of heightened state of alert which was imposed over the 4th, such an attack would have been foiled.
There was no more a heightened state of alert on the 4th than there was on the 3rd, and no more than there is today.
think you would be surprised about how the FBI/CIA/MI5 gain some of their intelligence.
If they get it from crackpots posting rumors on web sites than I'm moving to Canada.
, that hardly qualifies as "something awful happening to a Western target"?
