In AP's full, non-Twitter article, they stated he shouted "God is Great" in Arabic.It was a tweet, unprofessionally done, but not a published full article. Did they make the same error in any published article?
I'm not forgiving the error, but there must be a difference in copyediting tweets versus articles.
Thank you. That makes the error much worse. Many eyes must have seen that before publication.In AP's full, non-Twitter article, they stated he shouted "God is Great" in Arabic.
CNN has some more details. Apparently "he said he is Muslim, but prays to seven different gods" according to police. They also say he practices voodoo and hasn't been to a mosque in 25 years. His album is still on Amazon under the name B-God Mac Sun.
So he was a religious man then?
Is it the AP's job to report the news as it actually happened, or to translate any non-English words included in the story? If a translation is needed for clarity, why not report what he actually said, with an added translation, just like AP News has on their website right now. Stupidity for sure, malice?
'Allahu Akbar' doesn't even mean 'God is Great', it means 'Allah is the greatest'. So they not only got the language wrong, the only word they got right in the translation was 'is'.
All I ask is that we repudiate the notion that it's important to tweet the news.They did after a correction. You are pretty much asking they get it right the first time, as if such thing never happen in a hurry to report (ETA in a tweet!).
In other word you ask perfection no less 100% of the time.
Allah, being like God, as far as I know both the translation and the title, not a name, it is therefor correct to translate it by God is Great (the greatest being a nitpick, because since "there is no other gods".... and no "sets" to be the greastest from....).
One man's editorial choice is another man's conspiracy. It is an odd choice though.Seems to be extremely weak evidence that there is an active organized conspiracy going on inside the Associated Press.
Things are like other things and words look similar to other words, that doesn't mean you can randomly mix and match and come up with something that makes sense.
To specify 'greatest' is certainly not a nitpick unless you don't understand what's being said, which you appear not to. In general use, 'greatest' doesn't refer to any other gods, it refers to literally everything in existence. Therefore, Allah reigns over everything. When extremists use it as a battle cry it also means 'my god is better than your god'.
Actually, there is a reason it is conjugated and is not Allah, but Allahu, that's because it is not nominatif but rather substantif. That plainly justify what I said.
Not really. Extremist don't believe there are other gods. As I said the great greatest is a nitpick because by definition as a monotheist god, it is the most greatest encompassing thing. In this case it is a magnification, which adds nothing grammatically for the sense of the expression. It is a symbol of worship like somebody would say Amen, or interject God help me, or "Gott im Himmel" or "jesus christ which is lord over all thing" (or whatever).
This is why people of all origin, extremist or not, use it in time of distress or prayer.
This has nothing to do whatsoever about comparing to other gods.
Your definition makes as much sense as theist saying atheist reject gods but in reality accept it in their heart or such crap. From a moslem perspective, there is no other gods but Allah. From a Jew perspective (at least a believer) there has not been other god than Yhwh for the last few thousands years (it is a tad bit different if you dig in the past enough). From a christian perspective there is only the God of the bible (so Yhwh too).
If you don't understand the concept of "magnification" in religion, and think this is about comparing to other religion... You have completely missed the point of the sentence.