So long as I'm editing this to add exclamation points, I might as well explain why
Sherkeu's entry was so lame.
Sherkeu's words are in italics.
Nope.
With that one word,
Sherkeu is trying to deny several undeniable facts: (1) a court of law has found Trump to be liable for sexual misconduct; (2) Trump has "actively worked to subvert Democracy and is continuing to do so" by instigating the riot of 6 January 2021, continuing to refer to the rioters as patriots, and continuing to claim the election was stolen from him.
Democrats failed to provide a primary.
That, of course, is a straightforward and obvious lie. Primaries were held. All but one of those primaries were won by Joe Biden. Having collected almost all of the pledged delegates, Biden decided to drop out of the race, thereby freeing his delegates to vote for the nominee(s) of their choice.
Covered up the condition of the president.
That sentence is not false, but it fails to support the "Nope."
Lied about what people reported honestly (Eg. Hur report). For years.
The Hur report was released less than six months ago, about a month before Biden's State of the Union address. Biden has always been a gaffe machine who struggles to speak what he's trying to say, and his public performances before the debate were consistent with adding the normal effects of aging to the person he has always been. Even Hur suggested Biden gave the impression of being "elderly". Before the debate, very few Democrats would have been in a position to diagnose Biden's decline as disqualifying.
Then went after the opponent with novel legal claims and changed laws temporarily to do so in some cases.
We live in an age when novel legal claims are routinely upheld by courts, and in some cases invented by courts. The most egregious examples have been seen in Amarillo, the Fifth Circuit, and at the Supreme Court. Those most egregious examples were pushed by Republicans, not by Democrats.
These are not honest actors by any stretch in an already dishonest profession.
Trump's dishonesty is unprecedented. To pretend Trump's degree of dishonesty is typical of all politicians is itself dishonest.
Reap and sow..and now the Democrat candidate will lose.
There is an excellent chance that the Democratic candidate, whomever that might turn out to be, will lose.
Sherkeu is free to desire that outcome, but
Sherkeu's desire for that outcome is not evidence for
Sherkeu's claims.