• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Cont: 2024 Election Thread part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Not exactly, but it's a lot closer than I'm comfortable with and so much closer than it should be.



I'm pretty sure that this is not true.



Why do you feel the need to repeat extreme right-wing nonsense ?

By all means try to criticise VP Harris for any perceived failings on her part, but to claim that she's the lowest IQ candidate in history is pure nonsense.
Well not correct.
The data I see suggests she is mid 120s.
That is the lowest I saw, and I think it flatters on my hearing her speak.
I sure hope I am wrong if she gets 4 years to navigate.
Everyone seems to view this election as a catastrophe if the wrong'un wins. I am part of that population.
 
Trump is cementing his position as favourite to rule again.
This is strictly because Harris and Walz are terrible candidates who can not be taken seriously.
You are savvy enough to understand that Harris is a low IQ candidate, the lowest in history.

I so love the Sunday funnies.
 
Trump is cementing his position as favourite to rule again.
This is strictly because Harris and Walz are terrible candidates who can not be taken seriously.
You are savvy enough to understand that Harris is a low IQ candidate, the lowest in history.

... You're trying to say that Harris' IQ is the lowest in history? That would be very, very difficult to back up, in and of itself. When the immediate comparison is with Trump, in particular, it just ends up as an utterly pathetic joke. Trump's IQ is rather likely to be objectively rather low. Trump's talents, as demonstrated, are not at all in the direction of that which is measured by IQ. That's not to say that he doesn't have talent, of course, just that it's not in that direction.
 
Not any list I have seen.

As attempted with the link to what IQ is, perhaps taking advantage of the chance for a refresher on how IQ actually works may be in order? Invoking "list" here strongly indicates that you just have no idea what you're talking about.
 
Trump is cementing his position as favourite to rule again.
This is strictly because Harris and Walz are terrible candidates who can not be taken seriously.
You are savvy enough to understand that Harris is a low IQ candidate, the lowest in history.

You so funny. Trump is a moron. Old and decrepit Incapable of putting a coherent sentence together and ******* crazy.

Trump the convicted felon and fraudster and Vance, the freaky incel vs a Harris the career prosecutor and Walz a career serviceman, a dedicated teacher and America's Dad. Two people looking to be tyrants and two people seeking to serve.
 
Trump is cementing his position as favourite to rule again.
This is strictly because Harris and Walz are terrible candidates who can not be taken seriously.
You are savvy enough to understand that Harris is a low IQ candidate, the lowest in history.

Meanwhile:

in reply to

if you win in November can you commit to prioritizing legislation to make Child Care affordable and if so what specific piece of legislation would you advance?

Well I would do that and we're sitting down you know I was somebody we had Senator Marco Rubio and my daughter aanka was so impactful on that issue it's a very important issue but I think when you talk about the kind of numbers that I'm talking about that because look Child Care is child care is it's couldn't you know there's something you have to have it in this country you have to have it but when you talk about those numbers compared to the kind of numbers that I'm talking about by taxing foreign Nations at levels they're not used to but they'll get used to it very quickly and it's not going to stop them from doing business with us but they'll have a very substantial tax when they send product into our country those numbers are so much bigger than any numbers that we're talking about including child care that it's going to take care we're going to have I I look forward to having no deficits within a fairly short period of time coupled with the reductions that I told you about on waste and fraud and all of the other things that are going on in our country because I have to stay with child care I want to stay with child care but those numbers are small relative to the kind of economic numbers that I'm talking about including growth but growth also headed up by what this plan is that I just that I just told you about we're going to be taking in trillions of dollars and as much as child care is talked about as being expensive it's relatively speaking not very expensive compared to the kind of numbers we'll be taking in we're going to make this into an incredible country that can afford to take care of its people and then we'll worry about the rest of the world let's help other people but we're going to take care of our country first this is about America first it's about make America great again we have to do it because right now we're a failing Nation so we'll take care of it.

That is some mastery of language
 
Not any list I have seen.
I would wish she is competitive, but she does not wax that way.
However, I regard her views on DEI as repellant, so I guess I can't be reached.

Obviously, you can't read. Harris is leading in all the national polls and the swing states are a tie.
 
Well not correct.
The data I see suggests she is mid 120s.

So twice yours and Trump? An IQ of 120 is high.

That is the lowest I saw, and I think it flatters on my hearing her speak.
I sure hope I am wrong if she gets 4 years to navigate.
Everyone seems to view this election as a catastrophe if the wrong'un wins. I am part of that population.

Do you base her “low IQ” on the color of her skin like others who share your views?
 
Not any list I have seen.
List? :confused:

I would wish she is competitive, but she does not wax that way.
Wax? :confused:

However, I regard her views on DEI as repellant
Please

1. Summarise what you think her views on DEI are, citing your source(s)

3. Explain in what way you find them repellant, and why

so I guess I can't be reached.

Only those who are deaf to any and all evidence and arguments which contradict their preferred narrative can't be reached. Those who can argue their case (e.g. by answering questions like those above) can be reached, though not necessarily convinced.
 
Well not correct.
The data I see suggests she is mid 120s.

What data is that? Citation?

My guess is that the data doesn't exist.
Is something pulled out of some right wingers ass.
Or is something pulled out of your own ass and you don't know if it is **** or shinola.

But that couldn't be it? lmao. I'm looking forward to you presenting this data.
 
Well not correct.
The data I see suggests she is mid 120s.
That is the lowest I saw, and I think it flatters on my hearing her speak.
I sure hope I am wrong if she gets 4 years to navigate.
Everyone seems to view this election as a catastrophe if the wrong'un wins. I am part of that population.

Where is this? I don't see any American sources for that claim, only Trump related sources. If it was true, we'd have better information than claims from their kind.
 
Well not correct.
The data I see suggests she is mid 120s. That is the lowest I saw, and I think it flatters on my hearing her speak.
I sure hope I am wrong if she gets 4 years to navigate.
Everyone seems to view this election as a catastrophe if the wrong'un wins. I am part of that population.

More evidence that you don't know what the **** you're talking about.
 
I don't consider Harris's presumed IQ to be much of an issue when she is running against an insane, demented criminal. I've known a few people who had what were said to be high IQ's who were dope addicts and alcoholics, and at least one who was just plain insane. I'm likely one too, or so I was told many years ago, but I can guarantee that although I'm not, as far as I know, insane, nor am I addicted to anything, I'm not the person you want leading your country. You'd be sorry! "He's a lying, tyrannical rapist, but at least he knows how to define a bicycle and how to divide up the water in jugs" is not good information about the ability to distinguish right from wrong, lead a nation, or to be a responsible party in the world.

This would be true even if Trump's estimate of his own intelligence were accurate, which I do not believe to be even close to reality.
 


Most likely videos by pro-Trump YouTubers with titles like "The 10 Dumbest Politicians in US History" (who happen to all be Democrats).
It's like all the tabloids that ran headlines that supported Trump and attacked his enemies when one of his golf buddies was the CEO of the company that owned most of them.
 
Donald says

“I will bring back Free Speech in America.. I will sign an executive order banning any federal employee from colluding to limit speech, and we will fire every federal bureaucrat who is engaged in domestic censorship under the Harris regime”

Video in link

https://x.com/alx/status/1832786512422764937

Also the Fake Press are a threat and all the reporters are bad beople.
 
Trump is cementing his position as favourite to rule again.

:dl:

Name your price - I'll take that bet.

This is strictly because Harris and Walz are terrible candidates who can not be taken seriously.
You are savvy enough to understand that Harris is a low IQ candidate, the lowest in history.

I see you've decided to pick up Trump's latest ploy - doubling down on the insanity.

His most recent three examples are:

Making Elon Musk responsible for government efficiency
Deleting the Department of Education
Sending everyone who tried to get people to vote against him to prison
Taking personal control of the DoJ

But Harris is bad...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Back
Top Bottom