Can you see any current or former member of the armed services voting for him
Yes, probably a majority of them.![]()
Not if he keeps on attacking vets.
- “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured.”
- '
uckers and losers.'
[*]Disparaging Gold Star families.
[*]“Look, I don’t want any wounded guys in the parade. This doesn’t look good for me.”
[*]Not wanting to visit a WWI cemetery because of a little rain.
But you think the thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of vets, not to mention active service members, who still, after all that, worship the man are going to stop if he "attacks" them some more?
I suspect it is the inflation that is hurting the Dems in hte econ ratings.
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cr...business-ahead-policy-speech-lunatic-behaviorVice President Kamala Harris is expected to roll out her economic plan Friday during a speech in Raleigh, North Carolina. Early indications are it will have a progressive populist thrust, including attacks on corporate "price gouging," which conservative critics say is a smokescreen to deflect from the Biden-Harris administration's handling of inflation.
Michael Tyler, the Harris-Walz campaign communications director, said on CNN's "Newsroom" Wednesday that Americans "can expect her to talk about the ways in which she wants to move this economy forward and lower costs for middle-class families," noting Harris "understands that for too many families, prices remain too high." Additionally, this week, the campaign insisted tackling inflation will be a "day one" priority.
In advance of Harris' first formal policy speech of her presidential campaign Friday, her team announced Harris plans to call for first-of-its-kind federal controls on food and grocery "price gouging" by corporations.
That's, like, fake news, man.
I don't get it. This is the sort of populist proposal which I think voters easily relate to. Include the oil companies please.Fox says that blaming corporations, often a near monopoly in some category, won't help. Because voters do not understand this concept?
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cr...business-ahead-policy-speech-lunatic-behavior
I don't get it. This is the sort of populist proposal which I think voters easily relate to. Include the oil companies please.
- “He was a war hero because he was captured. I like people who weren't captured.”
- '
uckers and losers.'
[*]Disparaging Gold Star families.
[*]“Look, I don’t want any wounded guys in the parade. This doesn’t look good for me.”
[*]Not wanting to visit a WWI cemetery because of a little rain.
But you think the thousands and thousands and thousands and thousands of vets, not to mention active service members, who still, after all that, worship the man are going to stop if he "attacks" them some more?
Real talk?
Because being insulted is still better than "Oh you're just a poor uneducated lower class victim that the big evil military industrial complex preyed on because you were too stupid to get into college, it's not your fault" pandering.
Neither side has a healthy relationship with being in the military.
RFK is allegedly folding and asking for a job from Harris in return for his endorsement.
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/aug/15/rfk-jr-kamala-harris-cabinet-job-reports
I hope she doesn't; I can't imagine RFK is any threat to her voters, but is to Trump's.
Every country seems to be suffering from inflation, and they all blame their own government if they didn't vote for them.
Only one side denigrates the sacrifices made by our troops.