One function of legends is to identify and channel the anxieties of folk groups. There are several documented cases in which communities shared legends targeting and stereotyping unwelcome immigrants. One such case emerged in 1980 when large numbers of South Asians from Vietnam, Cambodia, and Laos were relocated to Stockton, California. Legends spread through the community that the immigrants ate cats and dogs - a practice met with horror and revulsion by many. Florence E. Baer summarized one of these legends as follows: "A woman in North Stockton discovered that her expensive dog was missing; a boy in the neighborhood saw a Vietnamese family down the street eating the dog and reported the gruesome act to the owner; the dog's head and fur were subsequently found by the garbage collector." A variant of this legend was eventually published in the local newspaper, the Stockton Record, even without any evidence substantiating the claims. This had a significant impact on perceptions of the legend's veracity, however, and demonstrates how the politics of legend-telling can compromise journalistic ethics and news credibility. Shortly after the publication, in light of the growing public hostility directed toward the South Asian immigrants, or the "Vietnamese" as they were collectively called, a councilman demanded a city ordinance banning the eating of cats and dogs. The legends told by the Stockton community expressed their fear that the influx of outsiders would irrevocably change their way of life. Legend-telling became a means to exercise control over the situation and to encourage political action against the immigrants. Unfortunately, examples such as this are not uncommon, even today. Legends have repercussions, and xenophobia is alive and well in America; rumors and legends about immigrant groups are repeatedly told and retold, identifying them as deviants - criminals, satanists, or even terrorists.