Yeah, nothing until two deaths; no mild cases, no people from China who tested +ve, etc.
Odd.
Well, by far the greatest numbers of infected people in China, deaths, etc are, and have been, in Hubei province. And from what I’ve read, there are very few “local” clusters outside Hubei (i.e. significant transmission beyond people who have travelled from Hubei, and those living with a locally infected person); more specifically, the numbers of infected people in border provinces (e.g. Yunan, Heilongjiang, Inner Mongolia) is low ... except for Guangdong and Heilongjiang. So the historical relatively low numbers of people who have returned home after New Year, from Hubei, to countries like Nepal or Myanmar, seems consistent with low/zero infections reported there.
Contrast that with the Philippines, Hong Kong, Singapore, South Korea (even the US, and Australia).
Modulo uncertainty over less common transmission routes, e.g. leaky sewage pipes, the continued spread of Covid-19 outside China (or more specifically Hubei province) will depend on infected people from Hubei traveling there, and establishing and expanding local clusters.
So one’s concern should be on such travelers (mostly strongly constrained) and local clusters (which are in Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore).
Gross, aggregate, numbers can be misleading.
Yeah, it’s a big concern, that infections are being missed.