• Security incident: ISF was recently accessed by intruders. Please change your password, and change it anywhere else you used it. Read more

2012 prophecies promoter and CERN LHC

You're wrong. I'm pretty sure we've been over this before.

So I'm not the only one with a slight feeling of de javu.

To clarify: The Popol Vuh (equivalent of Mayan Bible) states we are in the 4th world, otherwise known as the one that worked. The other three failed miserably, but our world seemed to work out nice and pretty like, and so we were placed in it. Now we've done a swell job of messing it up since, but as yet no text has been discovered to suggest an apocalypse at the end of the next 13th B'ak'tun. The only two texts that refer to the 13th B'ak'tun are the inscription upon Tortuguero monument 6, and the Chilam Balam of Tizimin. The first, the inscription, mentions only that 'Black... will occur' and that it will be the descent of Bolon Yookte' K'uh to the great (or red). No one knows much about Bolon Yookte' K'uh, but it's generally thought that he was a God, or gods. His name translates into a myraid of meanings, though one I would like confirmed is 'Nine Winds' if someone may. Mind, that at Tortuguero the b'ak'tun cycle was employed using 20 b'ak'tuns to the cycle, so the 13th would be way off the end of the cycle, and that because of the different length in cycle, the date of 2012 may be completely off altogether. The other text, the Chilam Balam, which while denoting the 13th b'ak'tun as really really important, is rather vague as to why. The particular events described on that date are this; "Presently Baktun 13 shall come sailing, figuratively speaking, bringing the ornaments of which I have spoken from your ancestors..."Then the god will come to visit his little ones. Perhaps 'After Death' will be the subject of his discourse." Mind, this is only one of the translations provided for the text, and is up for interpretation. I do not know about the other translation.

Do keep in mind that the cycle end date has been misinterpreted before, and that the Long Count Calender was used in various different ways. Also keep in consideration the reliability of the translations provided (I have no idea) and how these may be interpreted.

The myth of the Mayans predicting an apocalypse first gained popularity in the '90s, after being put forward by Michael D. Coe, a leading Mayan archaelogist at the time, who I vaguely recall quoting (not at the time) . This view has since been thrown out by the main scientific and historical community. You can still find a couple of his books lying about, and I believe that it may be possible to get your hands on a translation of the Popol Vuh as well.

Apart from that, we have two new sources! Those being the two texts as described above. Who's up for some interpretation?
 
Lots of info on this very entertaining site, "It's the End of the World As We Know It...Again": ]

Agreed. Hasn't the world suffered several deaths & re-births throughout it's long history?

I mean, those suffering the Dust Bowl HAD to imagine or 'think', "This is the beginning of the end of the world!?"

Which was followed by an increase in technology/intelligent manners, to affect a better outcome.

And, it is likely that this will continue to happen on varying scales.

Something like Katrine 'should' never happen again, because we're supposed to 'learn' how to prevent such catastrophes.

Our problem, as a people, is that we forget about yesterday.

We're like a herd of bison, just looking for the next greener pasture 'today'. Our news and daily focus is on what is happening today, yesterday, and in rare cases what happened 2 weeks ago. We are a people of now.

Our written history is a sparse 2,000 years.

'We' are much older, we just have a tendency to forget...
 
Last edited:
Agreed. Hasn't the world suffered several deaths & re-births throughout it's long history?

No it hasn't.

I mean, those suffering the Dust Bowl HAD to imagine or 'think', "This is the beginning of the end of the world!?"

No they didn't.

Something like Katrine 'should' never happen again, because we're supposed to 'learn' how to prevent such catastrophes.

No we're not.

Our problem, as a people, is that we forget about yesterday.

No we don't.

Our written history is a sparse 2,000 years.

No it isn't.

'We' are much older

No I'm not.

All in all, not a great post there.
 
A pretty limited view of "world" as all the references were restricted to the USA.
Given his moniker and the fact that the US has won every single final (ETA, 'cept 1977) of the World Series, it's not unexpected I guess.
 
Last edited:
No it hasn't.
Yes it has, at least twice. What do you call the Renaissance, or the death of the Roman Empire?

No they didn't.
.... Evidence? Don't know too much about the Dustbowl.

No we're not.
Well, we're not supposed to, but we expect ourselves to anyway.
No we don't.
Well, some of us might.

No it isn't.
Agreed

No I'm not.
Stop being pedantic

All in all, not a great post there.
Hey, it showed good forethought. Stop being picky.
 
No it hasn't.

Are you suggesting that the world has 'always' been just as it is? Do you NOT consider an asteroid impact an extinction event, that killed life, only to have it emerge in a different form- a death followed by a re-birth?

No they didn't.

I am certain, 'some' did. http://books.google.com/books?id=8f...onepage&q=dust bowl, end of the world&f=false

http://books.google.com/books?id=v_...onepage&q=dust bowl, end of the world&f=false

No we're not.

Now that's just ignorant. OF COURSE we are supposed to learn from our mistakes, so that history does NOT repeat itself.

No we don't.

YES, we DO: http://www.gallup.com/poll/3742/new-poll-gauges-americans-general-knowledge-levels.aspx

No it isn't.

Are you suggesting our history of the dark ages is 'complete'?

No I'm not.

We, as a 'people', are older than 2,000 years, I was not referring to 'individuals'...

All in all, your post was ignorant and w/o details or any evidence to the contrary.

Feel free to try again. :)
 
Last edited:
Gentlemen, please...

Doomsday prophecies talk about doom for the whole -or a large part of- mankind. With the possible exception of the 74Ky-ago lake Toba supervolcano eruption, no event ever came close to bringing us near extinction as a whole, as species.

Dust Bowl, Katrina, Indian ocean tsunami, the Fall of the Roman Empire, the Plague, Santorini eruption, Tambora eruption, Krakatau eruption, World War I and II, etc., regardless of how tragic they were, regardless of how many people suffered and lost their lives, these events never actually came anywhere close to threaten the continuity of the human species or of human civilization as a whole. Unless one adopts a very limited wordlwiew.

And since humans were not around to be affected by mass extinction events such as the K/T impact and the Permian-Triassic event, these do not actually add any substance to doomsday prophecies- be them cyclic or not. Remember, cyclic doomsday prophecies require human population, human civilization to be brought as a whole and suddenly back to square one and later rising again.
 
Last edited:
Well, isn´t it known that the world already passed through period of catastrophes like the extinction of the dinos, the ice ages and etc? Or course it happened a looong time ago, but supposedly it did happen. In general, doomsday prophecies seem weird and wacky, but it isn´t impossible that we ( I mean perhaps our generation) would face terrible consequences about the climate changes and increased tension between several powerful nations, complicated by things like the increasing anti-semitic feeling and several other complications, many which is being discussed here at JREF. Things aren´t going well, I´m sure. I´m not the only one who is feeling that things are so screwed that it might reach a scary peak not far too many years from here.

About the culmination year of all this crap being 2012... oh well, that´s another department, and we have to apply skepticism to it to avoid it´s dangers. There is a lot of people in USA stockpiling food, masks, building underground shelters, packed with water purifiers and stuff to prepare themselves for 2012 December 21st. Come on, that is ridiculous. These people´s lives are being affected directly by this madness. And it even has SONY pictures involved with their stupid viral marketing about the 2012 movie. I would be happy if Randi would write something serious about that crap and bring his opinion to the mainstream media. That would perhaps help to balance things up a bit. I personally think this is a serious issue.

In parallel, I would like to know for sure if the mayans/aztecs INDEED predicted the EXACT DAY of the arrival of the spaniards. Even if the europeans weren´t what they expected em to be, like gods and bla bla. If they correctly predicted a period of profound changes with their calendar, that is worth of investigating further. Why are their calendar cycle ending in 2012 and why their interpretation about profound changes at this date? My interest about it will blow away into tiny useless bits though, if I find out that they didn´t predict the exact date of the arrival of their deathbringers. I´m asking several people and searching the net and nothing concrete and academic can be found neither to confirm nor debunk this specific topic. But I have admitedly poor googling skills as I already noticed before. Maybe someone here will help me to spot it. :)
 
Last edited:
Gentlemen, please...

Doomsday prophecies talk about doom for the whole -or a large part of- mankind. With the possible exception of the 74Ky-ago lake Toba supervolcano eruption, no event ever came close to bringing us near extinction as a whole, as species.

Dust Bowl, Katrina, Indian ocean tsunami, the Fall of the Roman Empire, the Plague, Santorini eruption, Tambora eruption, Krakatau eruption, World War I and II, etc., regardless of how tragic they were, regardless of how many people suffered and lost their lives, these events never actually came anywhere close to threaten the continuity of the human species or of human civilization as a whole. Unless one adopts a very limited wordlwiew.

And since humans were not around to be affected by mass extinction events such as the K/T impact and the Permian-Triassic event, these do not actually add any substance to doomsday prophecies- be them cyclic or not. Remember, cyclic doomsday prophecies require human population, human civilization to be brought as a whole and suddenly back to square one and later rising again.

What is square one, exactly?

How much knowledge or communal capability do we need to lose, before we're back were we started?

---

When was the last true ice age, and how long ago was the mini-ice age?

Would or could these events knock down a global people, back into regional tribes?
 
Why are their calendar cycle ending in 2012
Their calendar cycle does not end in 2012. Their long count just goes from 12 to 13. Every way of counting time reaches a nice round number periodically; ours does so every thousand years, theirs every 394 years.

and why their interpretation about profound changes at this date?
There are no Mayan predictions or interpretations of anything at all happening in 2012, let alone "profound changes".
 
A pretty limited view of "world" as all the references were restricted to the USA.
Given his moniker and the fact that the US has won every single final (ETA, 'cept 1977) of the World Series, it's not unexpected I guess.

Toronto won in '93 and was declared the winner in '94.

Unless of course you're not talking about the baseball World Series, in which case I'll shut up.
 
Baseball.

But I had to get all my info from Googling, 'cos I'm not from that hemisphere of the globe.
ETA : The qualification required due to the Forum pedants that I know would have picked me up on the inaccuracy!
 
Last edited:
Well, isn´t it known that the world already passed through period of catastrophes like the extinction of the dinos, the ice ages and etc? Or course it happened a looong time ago, but supposedly it did happen. In general, doomsday prophecies seem weird and wacky, but it isn´t impossible that we ( I mean perhaps our generation) would face terrible consequences about the climate changes and increased tension between several powerful nations, complicated by things like the increasing anti-semitic feeling and several other complications, many which is being discussed here at JREF. Things aren´t going well, I´m sure. I´m not the only one who is feeling that things are so screwed that it might reach a scary peak not far too many years from here.
Some argue the consequences of climate change are already upon us. There has been seriously freakish weather patterns milling around, not only with the dust in Sydney recently, but the coldest May NZ has had on record (following on from the warmest summer in January)

Politically, I dunno. I already went through the whole 'WW3 is upon us' thing last time I was on a 2012 thread, only to be told and shown the whole idea was rubbish. Readers of Alex Jones and his site infowars.com will tell you all sorts of tales about how the food is running out, how the guns are running out, how a New World Order is being established at the G-20 summit, and how the state now owns your children. And that's just for America! People like these Alex Jones aren't doing any good with their news stories. All they aim towards is breaking society down into the very dystopias they already say surround us. There is a fine balance between ignorant and being gullible, which one must walk in order to get an accurate view of their world. From what I see, we have had several near misses, and will likely have a few more. WW3 is nearish, but not nigh.

About the culmination year of all this crap being 2012... oh well, that´s another department, and we have to apply skepticism to it to avoid it´s dangers. There is a lot of people in USA stockpiling food, masks, building underground shelters, packed with water purifiers and stuff to prepare themselves for 2012 December 21st. Come on, that is ridiculous. These people´s lives are being affected directly by this madness. And it even has SONY pictures involved with their stupid viral marketing about the 2012 movie. I would be happy if Randi would write something serious about that crap and bring his opinion to the mainstream media. That would perhaps help to balance things up a bit. I personally think this is a serious issue.
These people won't be the first. The Crusades bought whole economies under.
In parallel, I would like to know for sure if the mayans/aztecs INDEED predicted the EXACT DAY of the arrival of the spaniards. Even if the europeans weren´t what they expected em to be, like gods and bla bla. If they correctly predicted a period of profound changes with their calendar, that is worth of investigating further. Why are their calendar cycle ending in 2012 and why their interpretation about profound changes at this date? My interest about it will blow away into tiny useless bits though, if I find out that they didn´t predict the exact date of the arrival of their deathbringers. I´m asking several people and searching the net and nothing concrete and academic can be found neither to confirm nor debunk this specific topic. But I have admitedly poor googling skills as I already noticed before. Maybe someone here will help me to spot it. :)
Unfortunately, there isn't any concrete evidence, because there isn't any concrete answer. By the time of the Spanish conquest, the Mayan empire had collapsed, and all that was left was rival city states, greatly diverse in number and style. This annoyed the Spanish during their conquests, but they deserved it, the cultural brutes :p. The first attempt at conquest was done peaceably, with little resistance from chiefs who had heard all about what had happened to the Aztec. The Spanish got to each town already deserted. Then the Spanish found and attacked people, and the Maya got annoyed, and the Spanish didn't get any further then :).By this time the Maya had figured the Spanish to be bad, and so while some spared the bloodshed and surrendered, other tribes fought hard. The Spanish Conquest of Yucatan wasn't a complete extermination of the tribes there, it was a long and complicated war. I'm sure some of the smarter Mayans may have figured out the war was ending for them, but their loyalty would be to their kingdom, not to the Maya people. The Maya people were not a whole, and many city states just simply pledged themselves to the Spanish and lived for their effort. It really depends on what you mean by their own end. The Mayan nation had ended long before the arrival of the Spanish in 1511, by shipwreck.Back then the Spanish were very peaceable indeed :D. I'll inquire further.
 
Allright guys, despite my horrible english, I had to post this here

Please don't be concerned about your English, the message was well written and your meaning was clear. There are certainly folks who post a lot more who clearly have no clue how to write in English even though they have apparently grown up speaking it.

Additionally, I found a sign of the coming 2012 apocalypse today. I had to take my daughters' carseats out of the car so that I could transport a large box. While I was reinstalling them, I noticed that on the back, both say, "Do not use after December 20, 2012." I guess they know that there's not much point after that day. What I want to know is what part the Graco company is playing in the coverup... They are just down the street from me now, I could try to infiltrate their business and figure it out!
 
Yes it has, at least twice. What do you call the Renaissance, or the death of the Roman Empire?

I call them the Renaissance and the death of the Roman empire. The world did not die. The world was not born once, let alone reborn.

Stop being pedantic

No.

Hey, it showed good forethought. Stop being picky.

It was wrong about every single thing it said. That's not my definition of "good".

Are you suggesting that the world has 'always' been just as it is?

No.

Do you NOT consider an asteroid impact an extinction event, that killed life, only to have it emerge in a different form- a death followed by a re-birth?

No.


I'm sure some did. That's not what you said.

Now that's just ignorant. OF COURSE we are supposed to learn from our mistakes, so that history does NOT repeat itself.

Learning from history is not vaguely the same as preventing natural disasters.


That some people forget things in no way suggests that we forget everything as a people.

Are you suggesting our history of the dark ages is 'complete'?

What does that have to do with anything? You claimed our written history goes back 2000 years. We have written records going back over 5000 years. You were wrong. Again. Deal with it.

We, as a 'people', are older than 2,000 years, I was not referring to 'individuals'...

And we as writers are older than 2000 years.

All in all, your post was ignorant and w/o details or any evidence to the contrary.

Feel free to try again. :)

Given that pretty much every post you have ever made has been ignorant and without evidence, don't you feel just a little hypocritcal saying that? It's really very simple. Every single thing you said in your previous post was either wrong or nonsensical. If you decide to make some kind of sensible argument instead of just posting some vague stream of conciousness, I will certainly feel free to try again. Until then, I will just continue to point out when you are wrong or simply rambling nonsensically.
 
I call them the Renaissance and the death of the Roman empire. The world did not die. The world was not born once, let alone reborn.
:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall. Symbolically, and in reference to world politics, if you have to get picky about it.
What horrid insult have we brought about you for you to justify being pedantic? If you only came here to nitpick then you're just being an annoyance. Take a hike.

It was wrong about every single thing it said. That's not my definition of "good".
I didn't ask for you to redefine good, I only asked that you redefine a reasonable effort.
No.



No.


I'm sure some did. That's not what you said.
Again with the being picky. What are you trying to prove?

Learning from history is not vaguely the same as preventing natural disasters.
Tell that to the Dutch.
That some people forget things in no way suggests that we forget everything as a people.



What does that have to do with anything? You claimed our written history goes back 2000 years. We have written records going back over 5000 years. You were wrong. Again. Deal with it.
Agreed, twice.
And we as writers are older than 2000 years.
Agreed again.

Given that pretty much every post you have ever made has been ignorant and without evidence, don't you feel just a little hypocritcal saying that? It's really very simple. Every single thing you said in your previous post was either wrong or nonsensical. If you decide to make some kind of sensible argument instead of just posting some vague stream of conciousness, I will certainly feel free to try again. Until then, I will just continue to point out when you are wrong or simply rambling nonsensically.
Oi! Stop picking on him! I've yet to see you with a vaguely reasonable argument yet. All you have been doing is picking apart other peoples posts.
 
:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall:bwall. Symbolically, and in reference to world politics, if you have to get picky about it.

Still no. There is nothing picky about it. The world was not born, died, reborn or anything else. Those terms are just plain nonsensical in this context.

What horrid insult have we brought about you for you to justify being pedantic? If you only came here to nitpick then you're just being an annoyance. Take a hike.

I wasn't even talking to you in the first place. Perhaps if you kept your nose out of other people's conversations you wouldn't be offended by them. Take that hike yourself.

I didn't ask for you to redefine good, I only asked that you redefine a reasonable effort.

No you didn't. I even quoted your exact words:
Hey, it showed good forethought. Stop being picky.
If you're going to whine, at least have the sense to whine about something that actually happened.

Again with the being picky. What are you trying to prove?

Again there is nothing picky. Of the parts you quoted, two were direct replies to KotA's questions, while the other is pointing out that the evidence he provides has nothing to do with his original claim.

Tell that to the Dutch.

If you like. While you're finding one for me to tell, perhaps you could ask him at whether he thinks learning from history is the same as preventing natural disasters.

Agreed, twice.

Agreed again.

What makes you think I care if you agree? I was talking to KotA. And since you agree that I have proved at least two of his claims wrong, I am at a loss to understand why you then whine that I haven't made any reasonable argument.

Oi! Stop picking on him! I've yet to see you with a vaguely reasonable argument yet. All you have been doing is picking apart other peoples posts.

I'm not picking on anyone, I am simply pointing out that KotA's claims here have all either been wrong on simply nonsensical. If you don't like that, feel free to either support them with your own evidence or just stop whining and let him defend them himself.
 
What is square one, exactly?

How much knowledge or communal capability do we need to lose, before we're back were we started?

---
I can only guess. To bring us back to square one, you would have to kill a huge chunk of the billions of people who are alive nowadays, erase the knowledge stored in books and electronic media and cripple our industries- all of them from the base (farms, mining) to the very top (computers, biotech, planes and car factories, etc.). The disaster scale would be gigantic; I suspect the K/T impact would be the minimum required. To be honest, I suspect that the type of catastrophe required to reach the stage proposed by cyclic doom prophecies -recollection of the previous civilization is nothing but the feeble reminder of a long-gone gold age, all its tech and knowledge are lost - regarding our civilization would most likely result in extiction of human race. Or at least the survival of a very small number of people, a minuscle percentage of the population. No such disater ever hit mankind.

When was the last true ice age, and how long ago was the mini-ice age?

Would or could these events knock down a global people, back into regional tribes?
No.

We survived the mini ice age, we were not splitted back to regional tribes, in case you haven't noticed. It would take much more than that.

Remember what I wrote about Lake Toba supervolcano? It is supposed that only 40% of mankind survived the volcanic winter aftermath; some figures point to just 10k to 1k breeding pairs surviving. Guess what? we're still here. Note that human population back then was a very small tiny fraction from today's.
 
Last edited:

ISF - Join now!

Every member here is approved by hand. No bots, no spam, just people who care about evidence and honest debate.

Membership is free!

Create your free account

Back
Top Bottom