Travis and
Zig, obviously this Forum isn't the right place to settle your differences. I'll be happy to officiate the one-on-one paintball match whenever you find the courage to step up.
---
OK, watched it. Joe did good.
Most of his smiling and interrupting didn't bother me, actually. He read the tempo of the moderator and worked with her. I did think he lost lock and got a bit grumpy at around 1:05, and there Ryan picked up some pity points, but overall I don't think he was too mean or forceful.
Instead Biden seized the initiative in a rush seven minutes in and never relinquished it. He clearly excelled in the one area Obama totally blew, namely he made it clear that he really wants the job back and he's plugged in.
I wouldn't call it a blowout. Ryan got shelled on Medicare and taxes, and he was unable to follow the careful nuance Romney's clinging to on abortion, however he averted disaster on Syria (even if he still didn't answer the question on what constitutes grounds for intervention) and finished well on the question of rancor in politics (again, avoided the question entirely, but he used his time well). Luckily for him, his best performance was in the latter part of the debate, and his stammering middle period won't be remembered as well.
Ryan was definitely head and shoulders above Palin's performance, but that's a pretty low bar. The only lower I can think of is Stockdale.
The assessment of this debate should be an interesting litmus on honesty and self-delusion. I don't recall many liberals claiming Obama won the last debate. Let's see how many conservatives will claim Ryan won this one.
Well said. Now I confess that I thought the Romney/Obama debate was a lot closer than the consensus. The reason I thought so is because, first, there was no single soundbite of use to Romney, no single moment that Obama was pinned, rather it was a diffuse or largely intangible difference; and second, I thought by making so many radical last-minute policy changes (or dodges, or lies, time will tell), Romney hurt himself in the long run just to get a good night out of it. The polls have shown that Romney's gamble indeed paid off with a big bump, and strategically he managed to achieve a reset with his own party that until then had eluded him.
In like fashion, I don't see that Biden got any crippling single blow on Ryan, and Ryan kept it together. Ryan also appeared more engaged and hungrier than Obama did, even if he came across as somewhat overeager, junior, and unprepared as a result.
But there was some blood drawn. The one thing that startled me was Ryan attempting to walk back Romney's $2T military pledge. Biden also did a pretty good job of highlighting Romney / Ryan's utter refusal to provide specifics, while pivoting to present his own case as thoroughly decisive (maybe too much so).
In the last debate, many people criticized Jim Lehrer; I disagreed with that then and still do. I think he did fine. He created an opportunity that Romney took advantage of and Obama did not. Similarly, I think Martha Raddatz handled the debate very well, getting to good points and exerting a fine level of authority. Those who complain about the moderation in either debate are making excuses for poor performance.
Final analysis, Biden hit a nice double, players are in scoring position, it's up to Obama now. Ryan didn't drop the ball but he wasn't able to do anything with it either. A nice debate. Much more enjoyable than the last one.
My wife's final analysis, based on thirty seconds of sound: "Biden is like a crazy old uncle. That -- that other guy, sounds like a TV announcer or something. Like a twerp. I don't like him at all." Can't really disagree...
