Merged 10th anniversary 9/11 documentaries/ TV

Is it going to be on TV in the States or is it only online?

I'd have to say that you will be able to find both online. Rising has already aired (all six parts, each with about 56-57 minutes worth of content) and will probably air again. If you cannot watch them online there is always the torrent sites which will have them to download and watch at up to 720p HD. To date I think I've seen all of the newest 9/11 documentaries via bit torrent. Not only can I watch them at my convenience and go back to portions as I want but I've also seen a few that I probably never would've seen at all if not for being able to download them. I expect that the latest Naudet film will also be on the torrent sites soon after it airs.
 
I'd have to say that you will be able to find both online. Rising has already aired (all six parts, each with about 56-57 minutes worth of content) and will probably air again. If you cannot watch them online there is always the torrent sites which will have them to download and watch at up to 720p HD. To date I think I've seen all of the newest 9/11 documentaries via bit torrent. Not only can I watch them at my convenience and go back to portions as I want but I've also seen a few that I probably never would've seen at all if not for being able to download them. I expect that the latest Naudet film will also be on the torrent sites soon after it airs.

Okay, thanks!
 
Speaking of the Naudet film: Anyone near Bloomington, Indiana can travel to Indiana University for a special viewing of their film on Sunday the 11th, at 6:30PM EDT:

"Scenes of New York come to life in ‘9/11’ at IU Cinema"

Their film, “9/11,” honors the memory of the victims on the 10th anniversary of the World Trade Center attacks with an exclusive screening at 6:30 p.m. Sunday at the IU Cinema.

“9/11,” made by Gedeon and Jules Naudet, was selected by a committee for the College of Arts and Sciences’ Themester series as an appropriate film to commemorate the lives lost.

“This film is the most direct film related to 9/11, because a lot of the original footage was captured right there at the time by these two French filmmakers,” said Jon Vickers, director of the IU Cinema.

Just an FYI for anyone near southern Indiana who might be interested.
 
For those interested, right now, (8pm EST) on CBS is the followup to "9/11" from the Naudet Brothers.
 
I just watched the new "9/11" and quite a bit is new.

But one thing that struck me very profoundly, was when the firefighter Tony had to go and lower the flag at 10 House. His comment was "I don't ever wanna have to put that thing at half mast for the rest of my career. That's it. "

Wow. How touching, yet heartbreaking.
 
I didn't read much more than the last few posts but Loose Change 9/11 An American Coup is on HDNM on Direct TV. I was only able to watch about 20 seconds of it before I couldn't take any more.

-Scotty
 
I just watched the new "9/11" and quite a bit is new.

But one thing that struck me very profoundly, was when the firefighter Tony had to go and lower the flag at 10 House. His comment was "I don't ever wanna have to put that thing at half mast for the rest of my career. That's it. "

Wow. How touching, yet heartbreaking.

That was a damn good documentary.
 
On 60 Minutes, in his first TV interview, former FBI agent Ali Soufan discusses interrogation techniques. First he retells how he was able to get OBL's bodyguard to identify 7 of the hijackers as Al Qaeda members shortly after 9/11 (the bodyguard was in prison and didn't know who was involved in the attacks). The bodyguard denied it was an Al Qaeda attack. He showed him a book of pictures, telling him that he didn't know which ones were his sources giving up information. He then identified 7 of the hijackers. When Soufan explained to him that he had just identified some of the hijackers, and realizing they were not Soufan's sources, he collapsed, knowing he had just given up crucial evidence that it was an Al Qaeda attack.

Soufan used interrogation techniques that surprised terrorists; a soft approach. He would sit and drink tea with them. It surprised them because they were trained that Americans were evil and if caught would be handled roughly. He believes that with this technique, he was able to exact much more information than using tougher methods. He was a firm believer in what he called "knowledge and empathy."

Then, he discussed how the CIA would take over and use what he called border-line torture methods such as sleep deprivation. He claimed these methods were ineffective. When he would take over once more, he was able to make progress again. He also believed that more severe methods such as water-boarding were also ineffective (he never witnessed these). He bases this on the belief that terrorists are expected to be tortured when captured and their trained to resist giving up information.

He also contended that the CIA held information from the FBI that could have prevented the attacks, which the CIA denies. He has a new book coming out, which will have many blacked out sections because the CIA argues they are classified.
 
Last edited:
On 60 minutes, in his first TV interview, former FBI agent Ali Soufan discusses interrogation techniques. First he retells how he was able to get OBL's bodyguard to identify 7 of the hijackers as Al Qaeda members shortly after 9/11 (the bodyguard was in prison and didn't know who was involved in the attacks). The bodyguard denied it was an Al Qaeda attack. He showed him a book of pictures, telling him that he didn't know which ones were his sources giving up information. He then identified 7 of the hijackers. When Soufan explained to him that he had just identified some of the hijackers, and realizing they not Soufan's sources, he collapsed, knowing he had just given up crucial evidence that it was an Al Qaeda attack.

Soufan used interrogation techniques that surprised terrorists; a soft approach. He would sit and drink tea with them. It surprised them because they were trained that Americans were evil and if caught would be handled roughly. He believes that with this technique, he was able to exact much more information than using tougher methods.

Then, he discussed how the CIA would take over and use what he called border-line torture methods such as sleep deprivation. He claimed these methods were ineffective. When he would take over again, he was able to make progess again. He also believed that more severe methods such as water-boarding were also ineffective (he never witnessed these). He bases this on the belief that terrorists are expected to be tortured when captured and their trained to resist giving up information.

He also contended that the CIA held information from the FBI that could have prevented the attacks, which the CIA denies. He has a new book coming out, which will have many blacked out sections because the CIA argues they are classified.

Dammit! I forgot about that one. I missed it. :(
 
Dammit! I forgot about that one. I missed it. :(

I already have it via torrent. Still waiting for the updated 911 Naudet one to show up (it will eventually). I'm considering taking all of them and making up a compilation of all of the most recent ones from the past two weeks and then seeding it on TPB for awhile.
 
Watched my DVR of 102 Minutes That Changed America last night.

It took me right back to those feelings I had 10 years ago. I got lost in it. I actually had trouble sleeping last night...I couldn't help but re-live that period in my life.

9/11 is what pushed me to finally become a firefighter. This show just renewed that sense of duty in me.
 
I just watched the new "9/11" and quite a bit is new.

But one thing that struck me very profoundly, was when the firefighter Tony had to go and lower the flag at 10 House. His comment was "I don't ever wanna have to put that thing at half mast for the rest of my career. That's it. "

Wow. How touching, yet heartbreaking.
I think it's one of the best I have ever seen. Ever.

Finally I'm back in the good ol' USA and watched the DVR recording. I could definitely tell the differences between the original and the very carefully compressed version I watched today. The thing that got me, which strangely didn't get me before, was the montage of the many funerals. I suppose the bagpipes (playing "Amazing Grace") had something to do with it, given that it was played at my father's funeral.

That was a damn good documentary.

This is, by far, the best documentary on 9/11...we get to know the participants beforehand, see them through their horrible struggle, and learn their struggles continue. This is the 9/11 most of us were thankful enough never to have experienced.

Seconded. Decently balanced in a subject that could easily cross over into maudlin. Didn't catch all of it but what I did catch seemed to me to be fairly damning of treatment of the firefighters' health issues.

I'm totally in favor of the firemen getting all the medical treatment they need, be it physical or mental...but I'm certain that you would've needed an army to drag those guys away from that smoking pile. Unfortunately for those brave men, hindsight is 20/20.

This documentary was worth the wait, especially with the updates on the team from the firehouse. It is great to see that life still goes on (Tony sure has a pretty wife and adorable daughter) and Chief Pfeifer always reminded me of fatherly bosses I've had. I am convinced that people should watch this documentary at least once a year, if only to emphasize what one of the firefighters said:

I just realized, what I always wanted to deny..is how evil, evil can be.
 

Back
Top Bottom