To boil it down, DNS changes www.website.com into an IP address. ISP's and some dns services track where you go in hopes of selling it. 1.1.1.1 is a cool service, I'd use it if I didn't run my own DNS at home. I use cloudflare for other things and they're a big name in net security.
I'm still not clear on how I'd use it.
OK, not that I don't think this sounds like really good idea, but the first thing that made me "suspicious" was that when I clicked the INSTALL button to go to the setup instructions it took me straight to the Windows instructions. That means they performed a "reverse DNS" to find which OS I was using.... that really goes against what they are advertising.
Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 3_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/7B405
or
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
OK, not that I don't think this sounds like really good idea, but the first thing that made me "suspicious" was that when I clicked the INSTALL button to go to the setup instructions it took me straight to the Windows instructions. That means they performed a "reverse DNS" to find which OS I was using.... that really goes against what they are advertising.
I'm still not clear on how I'd use it.
OK, not that I don't think this sounds like really good idea, but the first thing that made me "suspicious" was that when I clicked the INSTALL button to go to the setup instructions it took me straight to the Windows instructions. That means they performed a "reverse DNS" to find which OS I was using.... that really goes against what they are advertising.
It means their web server looked at the ID code (the User Agent String) your web browser sent to that server when requesting a web page, which includes your browser and OS (including version info) by default. Example:
Your browser intentionally sends this info to all web servers it contacts.Code:Mozilla/5.0 (iPad; U; CPU OS 3_2_1 like Mac OS X; en-us) AppleWebKit/531.21.10 (KHTML, like Gecko) Mobile/7B405 or Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/52.0
Goole's DNS does, i believe, track your requests to further their advertising empire (as they do with searches or just about any other interaction with their products). I don't care enough about that not to use their services, if they meet my needs, but if you are bothered by that this service is an alternative.
I'm curious: Where did you get this idea about reverse DNS?OK, not that I don't think this sounds like really good idea, but the first thing that made me "suspicious" was that when I clicked the INSTALL button to go to the setup instructions it took me straight to the Windows instructions. That means they performed a "reverse DNS" to find which OS I was using.... that really goes against what they are advertising.
OK, not that I don't think this sounds like really good idea, but the first thing that made me "suspicious" was that when I clicked the INSTALL button to go to the setup instructions it took me straight to the Windows instructions. That means they performed a "reverse DNS" to find which OS I was using.... that really goes against what they are advertising.

I'm curious: Where did you get this idea about reverse DNS?
Thanks to the Patriot Act everything Google knows, the NSA knows as well, which is a bit more delicate than ad business. You just share more data in addition to all the other data these "services" already collect on you, making your "virtual you" even more defined. I avoid that as much as possible, not least out of principle.
If you don't want to be tracked why not just use Tor?