world trade center

we hear from the 9-11 deniers, that the wtc was brought down by a "controlled" demolition. well, whats a "controlled" demolition all about? it is the purposeful demolishing of a building, with the goal of keeping every square inch of the rubbel within the literal footprint of the building...

Long time lurker first time poster. Theres a guy on an irish forum, claiming this He then links to here graphics8.nytimes.com/package...s_full_01.html Add the http etc Anyone have a solid rebuttal or do I need to wade through the PDFs? Hey you guys do an excellent job Gravy I'll be over in...

Available temporarily here: http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=187763 (8 Mb .doc file) and here: http://www.yourfilelink.com/get.php?fid=187766 (3.8 Mb PDF). As always, the .doc file looks much better. In the PDF version, only the hyperlinks that look like URLs are clickable. Anyone know...

Fill in the blank. TruthSeeker abandoning his other threads to argue with Christophera is a sure sign of________________________

Has anyone seen this video? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EkZMQAC95kI Ironically, I was led to this video by a link on the LCF. Of course, the OP was summarily banned. I am, however, surprised they have not removed the thread altogether...

So what? And now? What next? :boggled:

Posted at LC in this thread: http://s15.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=14389 Video 1 (warning, disturbing content) Video 2 What do you make of these? :confused: :boggled:

Bush Misspeaks; Mentions Explosives in Buildings; Deniers Go Nuts President Bush, showing his usual flair for mangling the language, while discussing the need for vigorous interrogation methods: Well, of course he meant that the planes themselves set off explosions high enough. BTW, I think...

On the comments thread to Abbys description of her day at Ground Zero is a long comment (reproduced) below that makes the most elaborate 'joos did it' claim I have ever seen. Anyone care to debunk? (Apart from the Marvin Bush bit, I get tired of seeing it pop up.)

The FEMA Building Performance report gives good detail on the exterior + floor structures, but only plan views of the core colums (afaics) The NIST Fire safety report (afaics) only details the cross-sections of the different core columns. Can anyone point me to an elevation view/plan/diagram of...

I'm not sure if this has been posted before. If so, my apologies. It's an August 17, 2006 article about a five year study that has been conducted by Professor Abolhassen Astaneh-Asl, a prof of structural engineering, operating on a grant by the National Science Foundation. He was on the...

The WTC towers had 47 cores that ran vertical the length of the building. How did these vertical supports fail all along the length of the building? I could see failure if they were horizontal, but vertical columns would hold under any plausible crushing scenario. I do not see a pancake or...

http://www.jewsdidwtc.com/proof.php?evidence=cubictime Absolute proof! You cannot deny this very important evidence which National Geographic hid from the public!

Maxim: If a suppossed explantion does not explain the event, it is not the truth. No explanation that does not explain the event can be the truth. So far no explanation in existence explains free fall and total pulverization of the towers appears to exist. Has anyone seen one?