Blue Mountain
Resident Skeptical Hobbit
RolandRat said:Do you have *any* reason at all to assume that what you just wrote is remotely true? If not, please don't make stuff up.
This is what the shooter's wife accused the boy of doing. I literally said "assuming that's true".
True or not, the death toll is so high because the man had a gun. Yes, a knife would have been deadly too, and it's possible the number of victims would have been the same. Still I can't help but think had the aggrieved party simply stormed into the place in a rage but otherwise unarmed, there would have been a nasty beating and maybe one death, but not four.