• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

The TikTok Flip-Flop

Puppycow

Penultimate Amazing
Joined
Jan 9, 2003
Messages
29,826
Location
Yokohama, Japan
Trump's TikTok ban reversal comes after meeting megadonor who has stake in TikTok (ABC News)

As Donald Trump reverses his position on potentially banning TikTok ahead of an expected House vote this week on legislation that could lead to it being blocked in the U.S., the former president has been rebuilding his relationship with a GOP megadonor who reportedly has a major financial stake in the popular social media platform.

Trump met with the donor, hedge fund manager Jeff Yass, earlier this month at a Club for Growth donor retreat in Palm Beach, Florida, on March 1.
. . .

The former president, who had originally spearheaded efforts to ban TikTok during his time in the White House, reversed his stance last week, posting on his own social media platform that getting rid of TikTok would benefit Facebook and that he doesn't want that to happen, suggesting Facebook is a bigger problem for the country.

"I don't want Facebook ... doing better. They are a true Enemy of the People!" he wrote.
Facebook is still an American company though. TikTok is Chinese. So what about this "megadonor"?
Yass, who did not respond to a request for comment on Monday, owns a significant stake in in TikTok's China-based parent company ByteDance, The Wall Street Journal reported last year.

"I've supported libertarian and free market principles my entire adult life," Yass told the Journal then. "TikTok is about free speech and innovation, the epitome of libertarian and free market ideals. The idea of banning TikTok is an anathema to everything I believe."
Really? So can you criticize the Chinese government on TikTok? I've never used it myself. No interest in trying yet another new social media app. I'm skeptical of this idea that free speech is entirely unfettered on TikTok, particularly coming from a man with a big financial stake in the company.

Meanwhile, on the other side:
Democrat Sen Warner cedes 'Trump was right' on TikTok being 'enormous' national security issue (Fox News)

Senate Select Committee on Intelligence Chairman Mark Warner, D-Va., revealed on Monday that he believes former President Donald Trump was right when he sounded the alarm on TikTok and its national security implications.

"It was rare for me to say that Donald Trump was right," Warner said during a committee hearing on worldwide threats. "But Donald Trump was right years ago when he pointed out the enormous national security concerns around TikTok, both in terms of obtaining data, but also think about the percentage – I think there are about 170 million Americans who use TikTok."
. . .

During his presidency in 2020, Trump signed an executive order to effectively ban the app in the U.S. But the action was blocked by the courts.

However, the current presidential candidate has appeared to change his tune in 2024. "Frankly, there are a lot of people on TikTok that love it," Trump said in a Monday interview. "There are a lot of young kids on TikTok who will go crazy without it."

So lots of young kids being addicted to it is now a good thing? :boggled:

Just interesting to me how the politics on this have apparently reversed.

It seems like there's plenty of flip-flopping going on here on both sides, but what should I think about the underlying issue?

Although I don't use it myself, I have seen people on the train using it. You swipe from one video to the next. Usually watching only a fraction of a second to a couple of seconds of each video until swiping again. Apparently it's kinda addictive, and designed to be used on a smartphone primarily. You can use it with just one hand, for example, on a train. Low-effort, instant gratification and short attention span.

If indeed 170 million Americans use TikTok (really??) that would be more than half the country. I'm a little skeptical of that figure. Would TikTok users who vote punish the party that took away their toy? Or is it mostly used by non-voters or people who don't care enough to vote on the issue? If Trump reversed his stance on this, maybe he was influenced by a megadonor like Yass, and/or maybe he senses that the politics no longer favor banning it (whatever you think about it in principle, it's a vote-loser; simple arithmetic).

I imagine that TikTok users would tend to care more about the issue than non-TikTok users, and therefore, I don't see how being for banning it would be a net positive if indeed anyone would actually change their vote based on this particular issue. :confused:
 

Excerpt:
Here’s the analogy I like to use. It’s 1975 and a state-owned Soviet firm wants to buy CBS. What happens? Well, what happens is they wouldn’t be allowed to. The FCC would block it. The Committee on Foreign Investment in the US or its predecessors would block it. If they didn’t have the power, congress would write a new law. And even if it wasn’t CBS, if it was a chain of local TV affiliate stations, the outcome would be the same. There would be no detailed factual analysis or demand for gold standard evidence that a Soviet-owned television station might do Moscow’s bidding or that television is capable of influencing public opinion. We’d reject the idea out of hand. And rightly so, because the downsides would be very clear, and the upside minimal.
 
Last edited:
now, apply that same reasoning to private ownership, especially by some a far-right religious cult like Sinclair.
 
The fear that an entity with a malicious agenda should be prevented from buying a major US media platform. I think it should be expanded beyond just China or any specific country. I think Sinclair Broadcasting fits that bill, despite it being an American company.
 
I'm going to ask this as straightforward as possible in hopes that someone here will be able to answer it. I've asked this a ******* thousand times and no one seems to be able to tell me.

What agenda is China pushing through TikTok? It's a series of videos. It's the same as youtube shorts, or instagram, or the old vines program. If the idea is that they're stealing\hording\selling\using data from my phone then tackle that problem, but I've watched dozens of hours of TikTok and I haven't seen an agenda outside of my own algorithm.

The "attention span" nonsense is the same bull **** we've been hearing since video games, and before. If you don't like it, then don't like it. It's seriously that easy, but the US government don't seem to give much of a **** about Google mining every possible piece of information, or Facebook, etc. Sure they pay lip service to it, but what is this Chinese company walking away with that I'm supposed to be scared of? Reminds of the "stick hoop" scene in A Million Ways to Die in the West.
 
I'm going to ask this as straightforward as possible in hopes that someone here will be able to answer it. I've asked this a ******* thousand times and no one seems to be able to tell me.

What agenda is China pushing through TikTok? It's a series of videos. It's the same as youtube shorts, or instagram, or the old vines program. If the idea is that they're stealing\hording\selling\using data from my phone then tackle that problem, but I've watched dozens of hours of TikTok and I haven't seen an agenda outside of my own algorithm.

The "attention span" nonsense is the same bull **** we've been hearing since video games, and before. If you don't like it, then don't like it. It's seriously that easy, but the US government don't seem to give much of a **** about Google mining every possible piece of information, or Facebook, etc. Sure they pay lip service to it, but what is this Chinese company walking away with that I'm supposed to be scared of? Reminds of the "stick hoop" scene in A Million Ways to Die in the West.

Good questions. I’d say the difference is that Google is American and under some sort of US control, or would be subject to US prosecution, whereas TikTok would just laugh at any US laws it breaks. The US is seemingly toothless in trying to bite back at any Chinese spying, identity theft, or data mining.
 
How Donald Trump switched to defending TikTok

Two former White House aides tied to an investor with a stake in TikTok, including Kellyanne Conway, were involved in a campaign to persuade the former president

Josh Dawsey

“Despite their frustrations with Meta, Trump’s comments on TikTok were frustrating to some of the China hawks in his orbit who want the former president to take a tougher line. Still, one person in Trump’s orbit, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to candidly reflect their thinking, called TikTok a Chinese “disinformation warfare tool” but said that the former president also needs to get elected to deal properly with China.”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/2024/03/12/trump-tiktok-ban-lobbying/
 
I'm going to ask this as straightforward as possible in hopes that someone here will be able to answer it. I've asked this a ******* thousand times and no one seems to be able to tell me.

What agenda is China pushing through TikTok? It's a series of videos. It's the same as youtube shorts, or instagram, or the old vines program. If the idea is that they're stealing\hording\selling\using data from my phone then tackle that problem, but I've watched dozens of hours of TikTok and I haven't seen an agenda outside of my own algorithm.

The "attention span" nonsense is the same bull **** we've been hearing since video games, and before. If you don't like it, then don't like it. It's seriously that easy, but the US government don't seem to give much of a **** about Google mining every possible piece of information, or Facebook, etc. Sure they pay lip service to it, but what is this Chinese company walking away with that I'm supposed to be scared of? Reminds of the "stick hoop" scene in A Million Ways to Die in the West.

I don't know but I suspect the concern is more what TikTok is looking at on your computer/phone/tablet while you are looking at the cute kitten. I've been banned from having TT on my computer for several years by my employer because we are a DOD contractor. Not that I cared, don't even have it on my mobile devices.
 
I don't know but I suspect the concern is more what TikTok is looking at on your computer/phone/tablet while you are looking at the cute kitten. I've been banned from having TT on my computer for several years by my employer because we are a DOD contractor. Not that I cared, don't even have it on my mobile devices.

That is why I don't use Tik Tok. That, and I find the standard TIk Tok content to be incredibly annoying.
 
The fear that an entity with a malicious agenda should be prevented from buying a major US media platform. I think it should be expanded beyond just China or any specific country. I think Sinclair Broadcasting fits that bill, despite it being an American company.

I don't like TikTok or Sinclair media, but dislike trampling freedom of speech even less.
I also wonder just how the hell you enforce a Tik Tok ban.
ANd, of course, the question is who decided what is an malicious agenda?
 
Last edited:
I have to wonder that between this and the other thread how many ways TikTok can be spelled.
TikTok TicTock tiktok Tik Tok TIk Tok
 
Mark Lavin was still badmouthing commie TikTok on his stupid show yesterday or today, wonder how he'll spin the reversal. Or just ignore it.
 
I don't like TikTok or Sinclair media, but dislike trampling freedom of speech even less.
I also wonder just how the hell you enforce a Tik Tok ban.
ANd, of course, the question is who decided what is an malicious agenda?

Hey, if you want simple answers to complicated questions, there's always FOX News. I'm just pointing out that the focus on TikTok seems to go beyond the valid security concerns and into some good old-fashioned xenophobia.
 
Hey, if you want simple answers to complicated questions, there's always FOX News. I'm just pointing out that the focus on TikTok seems to go beyond the valid security concerns and into some good old-fashioned xenophobia.

Facebook, Twitter, Google and other American social media companies are blocked or severely curtailed in China.

I don't see how China has any standing to complain if the US does the same to Chinese internet companies.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Google_China

Once a popular search engine, most services offered by Google China were blocked by the Great Firewall in the People's Republic of China. In 2010, searching via all Google search sites, including Google Mobile, was moved from mainland China to Hong Kong.

By November 2013, Google's search market share in China had declined to 1.7% from its August 2009 level of 36.2%, though it has slowly risen since, representing 3.8% of the search engine market by July 2020.[3][4][5]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Firewall

The Great Firewall (GFW; simplified Chinese: 防火长城; traditional Chinese: 防火長城; pinyin: Fánghuǒ Chángchéng) is the combination of legislative actions and technologies enforced by the People's Republic of China to regulate the Internet domestically.[1] Its role in internet censorship in China is to block access to selected foreign websites and to slow down cross-border internet traffic.[2] The Great Firewall operates by checking transmission control protocol (TCP) packets for keywords or sensitive words. If the keywords or sensitive words appear in the TCP packets, access will be closed. If one link is closed, more links from the same machine will be blocked by the Great Firewall.[3] The effect includes: limiting access to foreign information sources, blocking foreign internet tools (e.g. Google Search,[4] Facebook,[5] Twitter,[6] Wikipedia,[7][8] and others) and mobile apps, and requiring foreign companies to adapt to domestic regulations.[9][10]

One point people in favor of this proposed ban or sale have made is that China would definitely do the same if TikTok were an American company, and has done so and continues to do so with regard to US social media companies.
 
Facebook, Twitter, Google and other American social media companies are blocked or severely curtailed in China.

I don't see how China has any standing to complain if the US does the same to Chinese internet companies.

Nifty. Not what I'm talking about. I couldn't care less what the CCP thinks. I agree there are valid security concerns with TikTok. I'm just saying those concerns should apply to all social media platforms, to varying degrees. For instance, what did the House of Saud buy when they financed Lord Hairplugs' purchase of Twitter? What do US financial backers get from the social media platforms they fund?
 
I also wonder just how the hell you enforce a Tik Tok ban.

Very easily. To start with, there are a lot of TikTok operations located within the US, and they can be shut down trivially. You can also block access to the app within the US through the major app stores.

But of course, that's not the end of the story, since operations outside the country might continue, and people can use VPNs. But here's the real nail in the coffin: even if it's hard to block user access to TikTok, it's easy to block advertisers. And if TikTok can't access the market of US advertisers, whatever US users are still accessing it become a liability, not an asset.
 
Something I hadn't realized about TikTok: It's already banned in China.

Yes, the Chinese don't allow their own citizens to use it.

That's right. The same company has a separate service in China called Douyin, which in form is identical to TikTok - a short-form video sharing app, even the UI is similar. The difference is in the content; videos on Douyin are all of people doing wholesome and inspirational things and conveying supportive messages. The harmful pranks, idiotic "challenges", conspiracy theories, and boasting about criminal activities that comprise the bulk of TikTok content in the US and the rest of the world are totally absent.
 
Hey, if you want simple answers to complicated questions, there's always FOX News. I'm just pointing out that the focus on TikTok seems to go beyond the valid security concerns and into some good old-fashioned xenophobia.

i agree that it's largely xenophobia with tik tok. i don't think there's anything tik tok is doing that's bad that doesn't apply to amercian social media companies.

that said, there is a lot of bad stuff on all these companies. like, are we really preserving free speech by ensuring giant tech companies have the ability to unethically manipulate an audience and specifically target children, or spread misinformation and lies and offer absolutely no consumer protections? apply that to all of them. it's not a good thing imo

but that's way more general than just tik tok. of course, none of that is a factor with trump, they just pay him money and he does what he's asked. there's no guiding principle with him, tik tok became a huge donor so now they're ok.
 
I have to wonder that between this and the other thread how many ways TikTok can be spelled.
TikTok TicTock tiktok Tik Tok TIk Tok

I never get it right.

I wish David Wong were still here, so that he could give his take on using TT.
 
i agree that it's largely xenophobia with tik tok. i don't think there's anything tik tok is doing that's bad that doesn't apply to amercian social media companies.

that said, there is a lot of bad stuff on all these companies. like, are we really preserving free speech by ensuring giant tech companies have the ability to unethically manipulate an audience and specifically target children, or spread misinformation and lies and offer absolutely no consumer protections? apply that to all of them. it's not a good thing IMO

Ya, there is a conversation her that is really important that goes beyond "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" and "MUH FREEDUMS"

but that's way more general than just tik tok. of course, none of that is a factor with trump, they just pay him money and he does what he's asked. there's no guiding principle with him, tik tok became a huge donor so now they're ok.

If he starts rambling during one of his hate rallies and forgets they donated to him, he may bash them while he sundowns.
 
Ya, there is a conversation her that is really important that goes beyond "THINK OF THE CHILDREN!" and "MUH FREEDUMS"

i agree, tablets are as much a children’s toy as anything else. and as much as i dont want chinese companies or the ccp gathering tons of personal data or using platforms to spread misinformation, i’m also pretty opposed to american companies doing the same as much as i am billionaires doing it.

consumer protections with this stuff are all badly out of date imo
 
Yes. Jason Pargin used to be an active member here under his pen name.
It's been ten years since he last posted.

oh i didn't know that he was a member here. i remember a lot of his pre-cracked stuff at pointless waste of time, thought it was some of the funniest stuff on the internet at the time. this is way back in the day. small world.
 
I think banning Tik Tok is dumb as ◊◊◊◊, but that's the world we live in.
It's not exactly a ban. It's essentially a requirement that the company be divested from China.

And I'm all for that, because ◊◊◊◊ the CCP. If you think the CCP can't or won't use TikTok to harm US interests, you don't understand the CCP. And nominal legal ownership means nothing to the CCP. Nominally, ByteDance is private. In reality, the CCP can force ByteDance to dance to their tune.
 
I never get it right.

I wish David Wong were still here, so that he could give his take on using TT.
I wonder if it wasn't DW aka JP who said he thought it was Reddit that we really should be given attention to in terms of it being a misinformation machine. I seem to recall he agreed there were also issues with TikTok et al, and that Reddit could be super useful, especially now that Google is becoming increasingly useless, but he viewed Reddit as the least understood, least talked about, and potentially most harmful social media site.

Found it:
 
It's not exactly a ban. It's essentially a requirement that the company be divested from China.

And I'm all for that, because ◊◊◊◊ the CCP. If you think the CCP can't or won't use TikTok to harm US interests, you don't understand the CCP. And nominal legal ownership means nothing to the CCP. Nominally, ByteDance is private. In reality, the CCP can force ByteDance to dance to their tune.

I'm not concerned. I use TikTok when I'm bored on the weekends. Probably 2-3 hours a week and I don't see any influence or anything like that. They aren't collecting anything egregious and, as you conveniently showed, all it's about is petty squabbling and fear mongering about China.

So, yeah, there's no reason to ban them other than to placate the rubes who will just find the next thing to cry about if it has any association with China. Unless they're doing something illegal, or collect more than Google or Facebook, then leave it alone. Quit bitching just for the sake of bitching.
 
I don't think you understand how useful location data can be.

I fully understand how useful it is but they aren't collecting anything that every other app on your phone isn't collecting (in your link it's a fitness app). If you're bothered by TikTok collecting location data then you have to be bothered by pretty much every single app downloaded on your phone. Google collects more than TikTok ever can, or could, for that matter.
 
Last edited:
I fully understand how useful it is but they aren't collecting anything that every other app on your phone isn't collecting (in your link it's a fitness app). If you're bothered by TikTok collecting location data then you have to be bothered by pretty much every single app downloaded on your phone. Google collects more than TikTok ever can, or could, for that matter.
Sure, I am bothered. But Google's data isn't going to be available to the CCP. That's not a small thing.
 
Back
Top Bottom