Sorry you misunderstood. Of course they knew the tail number. What I meant to say was "nowhere did any official report mention the tail number on the pieces" of fuselage in the FEMA photograph. I would expect them to use the fuselage pieces to say, "Look everybody - the tail number of the plane!" But nobody did that. So much conspiracy speculation could have been avoided if FBI/NTSB ever used serial numbers to match the wreckage to the registration numbers. I reiterate that I do not think any wreckage was planted.
Thus this is a dead end. The FBI/NTSB released the Radar data, it proves which plane impacted where, it is called part of the investigation. Whether crime or accident we "pull" NTAP (radar "tape"), and study the aircraft of interest flight path. How do you stop idiotic conspiracy speculation since the people who make up lies like remote control don't use or believe evidence anyway. It does not matter, the CT world will not accept evidence, or understand why accidents are different than crime.
There are rules for crimes, and different rules for accidents. The NTSB does accident, not crime. Therefore the NTSB has no authority or law required to release serial numbers, in fact, the NTSB does not do crime, thus the NTSB only provide services as requested by the FBI.
The WTC towers did not have to be rebuilt, they were destroyed due to crime, again there is zero need to investigate how the towers fell to solve 9/11 crime, it was done by 19 murderers, not remote control planes by people in your fantasy false flag dumbed down with BS.
How quick did they remove the steel? If they did not remove the steel, how would they find more body parts?
How does that remote control stuff work? I started flying really big jets in 1976, had four engine, 10 wheels, the biggest tricycle I ever drove and flew.
Not sure why you are surprised pilots aim for the center. What about the precision of Flight 93, did your remote control go haywire? And Flight 77, the FDR show bad bank control, real bad altitude control and the worse airspeed control I have seen except when I was messing around in "my" T-38 pulling 6 to 7 gs... did your remote control do that on purpose. Flight 77 did not hit the center of anything. Oh wait, you will say it hit the a section redone for possible bombings... IS there anything 9/11 truth, you and other CTers can't turn into fantasy opinion/anomalies which are then erroneously used as evidence for silly false flag claims. Flight 175, the darn plane was homing in on the WTC and failed to apply drift, and did not hit the center of the tower; was the remote control failing? Why would a remote control attack risk failure and fly a little over 1.2Vd in the final seconds?
Where is Russ W. when you need his BS. He never did support his claim with facts and evidence.
Where is the evidence for remote control? That is correct, you don't have anything.
Where is the evidence for false flag? Again, you don't have any evidence.
Yes, it is easy to debunk no planes, using Radar, 2 FDRs, Video, and eyewitnesses, even DNA, making no planes a sign of supreme ignorance.
Why say a photo is fake/photoshopped before you have the original. Was the original digital? What was the original format, was it a raw file proprietary to a brand of digital camera? Was it an original tiff from a raw, or was it entirely jpeg. I had people call my SR-71 refueling photo fake, and I have the original Kodachrome slide which I "scanned". It is wrong to make a conclusion using the internet photos. Plus, there is no point if it is fake, the best you can do is take away his Pulitzer. Did he get a Pulitzer?
The one from 3 years ago? Or is this a new one? Is this like the thermite study by Basile guy?
