• Due to ongoing issues caused by Search, it has been temporarily disabled
  • Please excuse the mess, we're moving the furniture and restructuring the forum categories
  • You may need to edit your signatures.

    When we moved to Xenfora some of the signature options didn't come over. In the old software signatures were limited by a character limit, on Xenfora there are more options and there is a character number and number of lines limit. I've set maximum number of lines to 4 and unlimited characters.

Anticipatory Compliance

You're wrong too - it is LEGO®.
Nope - that's the shape, colour and font that is the registered trademark. In a document you would simply use LEGO - and they are not LEGO bricks nor blocks, and the plural is LEGO.

LEGO in the USA was notorious for not following the style guide.
 
They are both wrong, it is LEGO.
And not a noun, therefore not to be pluralised.
“Lego group insists on the name being used as an adjective when referring to a product (as in "LEGO bricks")”
Makes sense since, “The name ‘LEGO’ is an abbreviation of the two Danish words “leg godt”, meaning “play well”.”

LEGOs bricks sounds weird, but then again, so does Legos. And shouldn’t the plural be Legos? Like potatoes? Perhaps Legos was coined by a prior US VP.
 
I'm a little too old to have played with Legos, but do remember stepping on a goddam ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ Lego.
 
For the most part, I doubt that children are the ones who buy Legos.
I did with my pocket money when I was a kid - got really upset one time when it took me too long to save up for a set so it was out of stock by the time I had enough.
 
NYU cancels a lecture on humanitatrian crises on the basis that it may be perceived as anti-US government policy. (Anti-US government policy speech is a detainable and deportable action).

PS I apologise for causing so much strife by mentioning legos
 
Last edited:
As Voltaire so nobly put it, "I may not like your having a right to say things, but I will defend to the death my hurt feelings by harassing you in every available way. Including deportation if by any chance you're not a full citizen, and definitely defunding anything you work on and closing it down if I can."
 
As Voltaire so nobly put it, "I may not like your having a right to say things, but I will defend to the death my hurt feelings by harassing you in every available way. Including deportation if by any chance you're not a full citizen, and definitely defunding anything you work on and closing it down if I can."
He was always good at the pithy summaries. I assume you were using the new Trump™ approved translation of his works?
 
Last edited:
So...let me get this straight...any non-white christian male hired to any post is a DEI hire?
Yes, and prepare for the criteria to get steadily narrowed down.

'In compliance with the new directives from the Führerbros, John, Frank, and Greg are to be laid off, effective immediately. We pride ourselves in running our company according to Christian values have no room for DEI hires who have been known to fornicate, 'forget' to wear mandatory golden Drumpf pins, and regularly miss sermons at the local church.'
 
NYU cancels a lecture on humanitatrian crises on the basis that it may be perceived as anti-US government policy. (Anti-US government policy speech is a detainable and deportable action).

PS I apologise for causing so much strife by mentioning legos
Looks like the Trumpian socio-politic is using the Modi playbook
 
So...let me get this straight...any non-white christian male hired to any post is a DEI hire?

If they're picking fruit or stacking shelves, no. If they're a corporate lawyer who graduated Princeton top of their class with a ten year 100% record of success in your sector then yes, I mean why else would you have hired them?
 

Back
Top Bottom