Anticipatory Compliance

You're wrong too - it is LEGO®.
Nope - that's the shape, colour and font that is the registered trademark. In a document you would simply use LEGO - and they are not LEGO bricks nor blocks, and the plural is LEGO.

LEGO in the USA was notorious for not following the style guide.
 
They are both wrong, it is LEGO.
And not a noun, therefore not to be pluralised.
“Lego group insists on the name being used as an adjective when referring to a product (as in "LEGO bricks")”
Makes sense since, “The name ‘LEGO’ is an abbreviation of the two Danish words “leg godt”, meaning “play well”.”

LEGOs bricks sounds weird, but then again, so does Legos. And shouldn’t the plural be Legos? Like potatoes? Perhaps Legos was coined by a prior US VP.
 
I'm a little too old to have played with Legos, but do remember stepping on a goddam ◊◊◊◊◊◊◊ Lego.
 
For the most part, I doubt that children are the ones who buy Legos.
I did with my pocket money when I was a kid - got really upset one time when it took me too long to save up for a set so it was out of stock by the time I had enough.
 
NYU cancels a lecture on humanitatrian crises on the basis that it may be perceived as anti-US government policy. (Anti-US government policy speech is a detainable and deportable action).

PS I apologise for causing so much strife by mentioning legos
 
Last edited:
As Voltaire so nobly put it, "I may not like your having a right to say things, but I will defend to the death my hurt feelings by harassing you in every available way. Including deportation if by any chance you're not a full citizen, and definitely defunding anything you work on and closing it down if I can."
 
As Voltaire so nobly put it, "I may not like your having a right to say things, but I will defend to the death my hurt feelings by harassing you in every available way. Including deportation if by any chance you're not a full citizen, and definitely defunding anything you work on and closing it down if I can."
He was always good at the pithy summaries. I assume you were using the new Trump™ approved translation of his works?
 
Last edited:
So...let me get this straight...any non-white christian male hired to any post is a DEI hire?
Yes, and prepare for the criteria to get steadily narrowed down.

'In compliance with the new directives from the Führerbros, John, Frank, and Greg are to be laid off, effective immediately. We pride ourselves in running our company according to Christian values have no room for DEI hires who have been known to fornicate, 'forget' to wear mandatory golden Drumpf pins, and regularly miss sermons at the local church.'
 
NYU cancels a lecture on humanitatrian crises on the basis that it may be perceived as anti-US government policy. (Anti-US government policy speech is a detainable and deportable action).

PS I apologise for causing so much strife by mentioning legos
Looks like the Trumpian socio-politic is using the Modi playbook
 
So...let me get this straight...any non-white christian male hired to any post is a DEI hire?

If they're picking fruit or stacking shelves, no. If they're a corporate lawyer who graduated Princeton top of their class with a ten year 100% record of success in your sector then yes, I mean why else would you have hired them?
 
I mentioned Novo Nordisk in post 25.
Novo Nordisk sagde, at det var et lovkrav, da de droppede kønsmål - men loven er ikke ændret (DR.dk, May 23, 2025)
Novos beslutning handler mere om at holde sig gode venner med regeringen i USA end om deciderede lovkrav, lyder vurderingen.
When they dropped gender targets, Novo Nordisk said that it was required by law - but the law has not changed.
Novo's decision is more about staying on friendly terms with the US government than about actual legal requirements, the assessment says.
 
In case anyone is wondering what the opposite of anticipatory compliance looks like:
Or this: Apparently, the U.S embassy in Denmark made a DEI demand of the municipality of Copenhagen, but Copenhagen didn't comply.
From reddit, May 19, 2025:
American embassy demands removing DEI in Copenhagen, or else the embassay won't pay for the embassy cars parking licenses... They were told no, and they walked back their insane demands.
American embassy in U-turn after "totally insane" demand of Copenhagen (TV2.dk, May 19, 2025 - Article in Danish - Use translate)
A reply to the reddit opening post is a translation of the Danish article.

A Swede (I assume) posts:
Same thing in Stockholm. Same demands when it comes to delivery/usage of heating, electricity, sewage etc...
I really hope all above is turned off.
And a third poster:
I think it's time to paint the zebra crossings around the embassy in rainbow colours. :-)
It seems to be happening everywhere:
They tried this ◊◊◊◊ in Australia with local and state governments as well as private companies and universities.
The emails were couched in language that stated that they ‘must abide by US law’.

Also here:
Unbelievable demands by the US embassy in Copenhagen (YouTube short)
 
Last edited:

Back
Top Bottom