Merged Human greed versus logic

[turingtest]

I see that wendy got a yellow card, for her #369 above, for breach of rule 11 (derailing from thread topic). I have to ask- how could the moderator tell?

(I realize I'm risking a warning of my own here; but a thread as disconnected as this one has become- as bad as the OP- just doesn't seem to have a topic anymore. It's a thread wandering in search of an end.)

 

[bruto]

Etymology is a fraught subject. When I went after my first wife with a cleaver she got positively edgy.

 

[Donn]

.. I have to ask- how could the moderator tell?

(chuckle)

 

[LashL]

I see that wendy got a yellow card, for her #369 above, for breach of rule 11 (derailing from thread topic). I have to ask- how could the moderator tell?

It was originally in a different thread (one with a discernable topic) where it was decidedly off-topic, was carded, and moved here.

/OT

 

[wendy moir]

.
But worth an "LOL!" at the very least.
I loved the part where clouds are "unnatural" bodies.
The rest just goes back to being classic Wendy, bless her soul.

As we are discussing air planes breaking the sound barrier, then the clouds they form are unnatural. Natural is nature forming the situation, since when is a plane natural?

 

[wendy moir]

You still haven't answered the question.

One thing they don't talk about is a Mythical Messiah who was crucified up in the sky. They talk about a righteous teacher who was killed by the Wicked Priest and his cronies.

Where is the Creator who sent all of the bodies stated to belong to the Christ incident?

In the Light of Heaven.

Therefore wouldn't the situation of holiness be discussing the incidents of Heaven? Isn't this where the holy bodies are.

Historians are trying to argue over a human life that never existed.

Philosophers argued about the Sun, the Planets, and creation. They wrote this information, not a Historian.

If you want to discuss religion, then be a religious leader. If you want to argue about a topic which you have no right to argue about, then why are you arguing? Aren't you arguing about religion itself?

Didn't Philosophical religion record this information?

If by term of reference hidden is the value for the WORD OF GOD, then look at word terminologies and it demonstrates what was not discussed in normal religious moral teachings.

In the WORD, man is the alpha, and the alpha in creation relates to the alpha in creation, not an alpha in humanity. Who are you kidding when you try to imply these spiritual references to a human alpha.....what's a human alpha then?

 

[Nay_Sayer]

As we are discussing air planes breaking the sound barrier, then the clouds they form are unnatural. Natural is nature forming the situation, since when is a plane natural?

 

[I Ratant]

As we are discussing air planes breaking the sound barrier, then the clouds they form are unnatural. Natural is nature forming the situation, since when is a plane natural?

.
Wendy, EVERYTHING on this planet is natural! The aluminum in the planes.. aluminum is one of the most abundant elements here. The sand that is refined into the glass and electronics.. totally natural. The fuel is refined oil.
Now you may object to the modifications to these naturally occuring sources, but without those modifications, we'd be sitting in caves hiding from the bassets in the caves around us, and defending ourselves with unflaked rocks!
Putting a rock on a stick helped the species survive to diversify, MOF!
The leverage of the rock at the end of the stick and swung by the arm was quite a force multiplier!
We now have ICBMs to do that.
Ever seen one fly?
That is one of most beautiful things a manufactured object does.. observing that flame push the rocket up past the atmosphere.. like a flower growing very quickly!
.
ICBM test going to Kwajalein Island, from Vandenburg, CA which is about 200 miles away.

 

[Belz...]

If Jesus was a alpha body (man) growing inside the holy body of the Immaculate conceives spirit Mother (atmosphere) as a mathematical principle and was sacrificed because of human deceit (as per philosophical discussion) then it would imply a rhetorical situation.]

That's beautiful. I couldn't produce a better word salad if I poured a game of Scrabble on the floor.

 

[LSSBB]

That's beautiful. I couldn't produce a better word salad if I poured a game of Scrabble on the floor.

It's a very Gnostic statement. All it needs is "Error was Conceived" and a reference to the demiurge.

Warning: Must be taken with Tylenol.

 

[bruto]

an off topic digression was removed from this thread, but I think that a part of my response was on topic, so I hope it is permissible to repeat the gist of it here:

My joke, above, about going after my ex wife with a cleaver was intended, in a silly way, to illustrate the danger of using etymology to substantiate anything, especially conspiracy theory, territory into which this thread has repeatedly strayed.

If Ms. Moir misses my point: the word "cleave" is a classic example of a word that means two opposite things at once, owing to the convergence of two nearly (but not quite) identically spelled ancient root words. When referring to an edged tool, to cleave means to cut something asunder. When referring to a wife, to cleave means to adhere and never come asunder.

The idiomatic expression "edgy" also has nothing to do with the sharp part of a cleaver. The sense of what an edge is has diverged.

I ask the indulgence of the moderators on this, because I believe it is an important idea to convey, that basing ideas on etymology is a questionable practice even for those who are intimately acquainted with the history of a language and its spoken idioms, and a laughable disaster for those who are not.

 

[bruto]

Sorry, I can't help myself....

The doggerel barks up the etymological tree....

Did the famous sounder of Gadarene swine
Test for depth ahead of time?

Do founders dip their pens in ink
Before they dip beneath the drink?

We cleave to what we hold most dear,
And cleave the cutlets from a deer.

And sanction what we most adore,
While sanctioning what we abhor.

An idiom's ending misarranged
Becomes the name for one deranged.

Linguistic study caution begs,
When even Partridge laid some eggs.

 

[Elizabeth I]

...basing ideas on etymology is a questionable practice even for those who are intimately acquainted with the history of a language and its spoken idioms, and a laughable disaster for those who are not.

In my experience, "just so" etymologies are an almost infallible indicator of a purely woo hypothesis.

 

[I Ratant]

A shot of a Titan ICBM launch from Vandenburg.. we were coming back to Palmdale after a test flight over the Pacific, when this one went up after we'd cleared the test range.

 

[TheRedWorm]

It's a very Gnostic statement. All it needs is "Error was Conceived" and a reference to the demiurge.

Warning: Must be taken with TylenolVodka.

I thought a small change might be in order.

 

[Donn]

Sorry, I can't help myself....
The doggerel barks up the etymological tree....

Bravo, we cry, what a poet!
But we hired a bravo, just so you know it.

 

[TjW]

As we are discussing air planes breaking the sound barrier, then the clouds they form are unnatural. Natural is nature forming the situation, since when is a plane natural?

Airplanes are just as natural as birds. They fly using the same principles.

 

[wendy moir]

This post was submitted on this forum for the discussion of fraudulent activity that has always involved human greed and intellect. I understood that this forum regarded information submitted in the public that related to skepticism. That it also regarded the pursuit of particular human behaviors that related to human abuses regarding the application and use of fear tactics and public mis-information.

As I have been trying to discuss I became aware of an illegal scientific research program that was purposefully using human and animal subjects in a cellular contact and cellular data attack by a NASA satellite program regarding information for gaining a BIO FUEL.

I have tried to explain how and why I became aware of this program.

Since this situation involves my personal life I have also supplied what some of you demean as circumstantial evidence of this situation.

The following has happened to me since my last postings.

A play toy mouse was placed on my neighbors son's bed, who is living with us at the moment. As I am house cleaning for them as they have sold their house, when I went into their office to clean there was a stinking dead mouse.

My husband about to fly out in a work situation interstate, his company's plane the day before has its engine caught on fire.

His car, has had its transmisSION changed and we may need to replace the car.

A dead tail of a cat or fox was placed on my property.

 

[wendy moir]

Airplanes are just as natural as birds. They fly using the same principles.

Planes are not natural, they are not the same as birds and cause reactions as they pass through the natural atmospheric condition. Birds don't.

 

[wendy moir]

That's beautiful. I couldn't produce a better word salad if I poured a game of Scrabble on the floor.

Philosophers were intellectuals who questioned creation, just like human's still do today.

Language and self expression has changed over the eras and the Philosophers used their own form of statements that were regarded in their levels of intellectual orders. Therefore the public were not privy to the intellect involved in the rhetoric.

Therefore to be skeptical about the Philosophical statements is to also review that Philosophers and intellect were involved in the writing of this information. As they actually detail they were discussing creation, and the alpha in the discussion relates to dust any human being with a self realization of creation would apply the literature to states of creation itself.

After all dust is a real state. Alpha is also a real state as a intellectual/scientific review of creation data. Man in the documents is discussing the states of alpha, as the term for man is actually alpha.

If you try to imply the man is a real subject in the logic discussing creation then skeptically the review would reveal that by applying skepticism, the subject you are religiously discussing as a human alpha becomes a denied review. The information can determine a totally different review to religious belief.

The religious subject itself implies that the use of public mis-information has been an applied tactic used in society for a very long time.