Project ROSE Is Arresting Sex Workers in Arizona to Save Their Souls

Crow T R0bot

Thinker
Joined
Jun 14, 2013
Messages
161
And Arizona for the umpteenth time proves how backwards and depraved it is as it tries to resolve its "problems" with prostitution.

In May 2013, Monica Jones, a student and sex-work activist, was arrested for “manifesting prostitution” by the Phoenix police.

Hers was one of more than 350 arrests carried out by Project ROSE in conjunction with Phoenix police since the programme's inception in 2011.

Project ROSE is a Phoenix city programme that arrests sex workers in the name of saving them. In five two-day stings, more than 100 police officers targeted alleged sex workers on the street and online. They brought them in handcuffs to the Bethany Bible Church. There, the sex workers were forced to meet with prosecutors, detectives, and representatives of Project ROSE, who offered a diversion programme to those who qualified. Those who did not may face months or years in jail.

In the Bethany Bible Church, those arrested were not allowed to speak to lawyers. Despite the handcuffs, they were not officially “arrested” at all.

In law enforcement, language goes through the looking glass. Lieutenant James Gallagher, the former head of the Phoenix Vice Department, told me that Project ROSE raids were “programmes.” The arrests were “contact.” And the sex workers who told Al Jazeera that they had been kidnapped in those windowless church rooms – they were “lawfully detained.”

“Project ROSE is a service opportunity for a population involved in a very complex problem,” Lieutenant Gallagher wrote to me in an email. Sex workers were criminals and victims at once. They were fair game to imprison, as long as they were getting “help.”

Project ROSE is the creation of Dr. Dominique Roe-Sepowitz. She is the director of the Office of Sex Trafficking Intervention Research and a tenured professor at Arizona State University, where Monica Jones is a student. Once, she and Monica had even debated Project ROSE.

According to Project ROSE's website, most costs are absorbed by taxpayers, who pay the salaries of the officers carrying out the raids. Fifteen-hundred dollars (£900) more per day goes to the Bethany Bible Church. Volunteers, including students from Arizona State University, fill in the gaps. SWOP-Phoenix, an activist organisation by and for sex workers, is filing freedom of information requests to discover ROSE's other sources of funding.

At first, Project ROSE may seem similar to the many diversion programmes in the United States, in which judges sentence offenders to education, rehab, or community service rather than giving them a criminal record. What makes ROSE different is that it doesn't work with the convicted. Rather, its raids funnel hundreds of people into the criminal justice system. Denied access to lawyers, many of these people are coerced into ROSE's programme without being convicted of any crime. Project ROSE may not seem constitutional, but to Roe-Sepowitz, “rescue” is more important than rights.

In November 2013, Roe-Sepowitz told Al Jazeera: “Once you've prostituted you can never not have prostituted... Having that many body parts in your body parts, having that many body fluids near you and doing things that are freaky and weird really messes up your ideas of what a relationship looks like, and intimacy.”

“As a social worker, you’re supposed to see your clients as human beings,” Monica told me. “But her way of thinking is that once you’re a sex worker, you can never not be a sex worker.”

To the best of Google's knowledge, Roe-Sepowitz has not spoken to any press since Al Jazeera. She ignored my repeated requests for comment, and she has only been willing to engage sex workers if they risked their freedom by speaking to her class alongside members of the police.

Monica is a proud activist. Days ago she spoke to USA Today, comparing struggles against Arizona's SB 1062 bill (which permits businesses to discriminate against LGBT individuals) to those her family fought for their civil rights. On her third year of a social-work degree, Monica volunteers with battered women, works at a needle exchange, and passes out condoms to sex workers. She is a member of SWOP-Phoenix (Sex Workers' Outreach Project). She describes herself as “homemaker at heart,” a girl who loves to cook, dance, and party, but also as an “advocate.”

Monica fears she was targeted for this advocacy.

On the day cops dragged Monica to Bethany Bible Church, she had posted on Backpage.com, an advertising service used by sex workers, to warn them of a coming sting. The day before, she had spoken against Project ROSE at a SWOP rally.

Monica told me she had accepted a ride home from her favourite bar the night of her arrest. Once inside the car, undercover officers handcuffed her. They were rude, she said, calling her “he” and “it” (Monica is trans, but her ID lists her as a female). They threatened to take her to jail. Like many incarcerated trans women, Monica had previously been imprisoned with men. Frightened, Monica agreed for them to take her to the church.

Ineligible for Project ROSE's diversion programme because of previous prostitution convictions, Monica now faces months in jail and worries incarceration will hamper her pursuit of a degree. She has been questioned on the street three times since her arrest. Once, police handcuffed her for 15 minutes.

...

There's more...much more...and much worse, in the article. I think it's time we took a star off our flag at this rate if this is how Arizona treats the human beings on its soil.
 
Last edited:
What is with Arizona's sex obsession? Keep it up and they may replace Florida as the weirdest state in the Union.
 
What is with Arizona's sex obsession? Keep it up and they may replace Florida as the weirdest state in the Union.

Apples and oranges my friend...FL has got the shootings thing, AZ has got the sex thing. They're both weird in their own special way.
 
Kind of reminds you of the goog old days of Torquemada mentallity. We'll save your soul even if it kills you.
 
Kind of reminds you of the goog old days of Torquemada mentallity. We'll save your soul even if it kills you.
.
Torquie had the best conviction rate of any prosecutor ever!
100%!
Any ambitious DA would love to be able to get that rate.. by whatever means, including Torquie's!
 
I suspect, with the publicity, this will soon stop when cooler heads intervene (the Federal Government? People who understand the law?). But that doesn't make up for the people previously subjected to this illegality.

And yes, a new illegality will take place, maybe in Arizona, maybe somewhere else, which will clearly be unfair but will uphold our "Christian morality" for a time (until it is publicized as illegal and unconstitutional). This is why ACLU is in my will and one of my donations now.
 
Then you can explain the pith/joke to me, because it passed me completely :p.

It's an "Land of AZ" thang...

You asked how kidnapping sex workers to make them listen to proselytization and signup for "church camps" as their only alternative to being arrested and going to jail could be legal.

It isn't legal, for multiple due process reasons, if nothing else.

Checkmite implied that legality was not the issue, because, as Crow T R0bot made clear, it is happening in the land of AZ, where legality comes in last behind "morality", "avoiding teh sexicky", "thes is Amurcah, and doanchew fergitit, bwah", and "catering to teh moneys", among other such considerations.

In other words, "it's happening because Arizona".

(x-ref "English Only", "Pickaninnies", "Legalized Discrimination", and "Let's Electrify the Fence".)
 
Last edited:
And Arizona for the umpteenth time proves how backwards and depraved it is as it tries to resolve its "problems" with prostitution.



There's more...much more...and much worse, in the article. I think it's time we took a star off our flag at this rate if this is how Arizona treats the human beings on its soil.

I thought that the "manifesting prostitution" charge was complete bunkum until I looked up the Phoenix statute
23-52 Prostitution, soliciting an act of prostitution and related offenses.

A. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor who:

1. Offers to, agrees to, or commits an act of prostitution;

2. Solicits or hires another person to commit an act of prostitution;

3. Is in a public place, a place open to public view or in a motor vehicle on a public roadway and manifests an intent to commit or solicit an act of prostitution. Among the circumstances that may be considered in determining whether such an intent is manifested are: that the person repeatedly beckons to, stops or attempts to stop or engage passersby in conversation or repeatedly, stops or attempts to stop, motor vehicle operators by hailing, waiving of arms or any other bodily gesture; that the person inquires whether a potential patron, procurer or prostitute is a police officer or searches for articles that would identify a police officer; or that the person requests the touching or exposure of genitals or female breast;

4. Aids or abets the commission of any of the acts prohibited by this Section.​

By combining 3 and 4, I think the state can make a good run at indicting the advocate. I don't think it is right or appropriate in any way, but I think they can play with the letter of the law and win a case against her.

As for the operation, I am astounded that such a gross violation of civil rights can occur here in 2014. I imagine it is only a matter of time before the morality police use the exact same words to kidnap homosexuals in an effort to save their souls.

I also thought the use of volunteer college students was incredibly stupid. I think the kids with book smarts may be rather easily bamboozled by the adults with street smarts.
 
What is with Arizona's sex obsession? Keep it up and they may replace Florida as the weirdest state in the Union.

Both are states that have a large number of retirees (warm climates and all), making an influential voting block state politicans love to woo.
 
Project ROSE said:
In the Bethany Bible Church, those arrested were not allowed to speak to lawyers. Despite the handcuffs, they were not officially “arrested” at all.

Legally, that sentence is a contradiction. A person is in custody if they are not allowed to leave. Being in handcuffs is a good sign you are "not allowed to leave."

In law enforcement, language goes through the looking glass. Lieutenant James Gallagher, the former head of the Phoenix Vice Department, told me that Project ROSE raids were “programmes.” The arrests were “contact.” And the sex workers who told Al Jazeera that they had been kidnapped in those windowless church rooms – they were “lawfully detained.”

Which means they had a right to speak to an attorney. Miranda attaches in a "custodial interrogation." Clearly, they were being interrogated. "Custody" is (as I said above) when the person is not free to leave if they choose.

“Project ROSE is a service opportunity for a population involved in a very complex problem,” Lieutenant Gallagher wrote to me in an email. Sex workers were criminals and victims at once. They were fair game to imprison, as long as they were getting “help.”

I'll tell that to people I know who willingly worked as sex workers. No pimps. No doing it to buy drugs. They did it for some extra money, or because they enjoyed it.

Project ROSE may not seem constitutional,

Maybe because it isn't.

In November 2013, Roe-Sepowitz told Al Jazeera: “Once you've prostituted you can never not have prostituted... Having that many body parts in your body parts, having that many body fluids near you and doing things that are freaky and weird really messes up your ideas of what a relationship looks like, and intimacy.”

Huh... So the friends I mentioned above - the ones who used to do sex work... The ones who are now happily married... And no longer do sex work...

Yeah...

Monica told me she had accepted a ride home from her favourite bar the night of her arrest. Once inside the car, undercover officers handcuffed her. They were rude, she said, calling her “he” and “it” (Monica is trans, but her ID lists her as a female). They threatened to take her to jail. Like many incarcerated trans women, Monica had previously been imprisoned with men. Frightened, Monica agreed for them to take her to the church.

Wait, so she wasn't even a sex worker? She just works with them?


I don't understand how this can be legal.

It's not.

I thought that the "manifesting prostitution" charge was complete bunkum until I looked up the Phoenix statute
23-52 Prostitution, soliciting an act of prostitution and related offenses.

A. A person is guilty of a misdemeanor who:

(snip)
3. Is in a public place, a place open to public view or in a motor vehicle on a public roadway and manifests an intent to commit or solicit an act of prostitution. Among the circumstances that may be considered in determining whether such an intent is manifested are: that the person repeatedly beckons to, stops or attempts to stop or engage passersby in conversation or repeatedly, stops or attempts to stop, motor vehicle operators by hailing, waiving of arms or any other bodily gesture; that the person inquires whether a potential patron, procurer or prostitute is a police officer or searches for articles that would identify a police officer; or that the person requests the touching or exposure of genitals or female breast;

4. Aids or abets the commission of any of the acts prohibited by this Section.​

By combining 3 and 4, I think the state can make a good run at indicting the advocate.

3, no. She didn't do any of the things (or anything like the things) listed in that subsection. She got into the back seat of a car after leaving a bar.

There is an outside chance with 4. However, just reading it and speaking as a defense attorney, I'd be willing to take a charge under 4 to trial. The state would have to prove that she had (within a documented time frame) actually aided in prostitution. Handing out condoms is not aiding in prostitution.

I imagine it is only a matter of time before the morality police use the exact same words to kidnap homosexuals in an effort to save their souls.

Matter of time? They've been doing it for years to gay teens. (With their parent's permission)
 
Last edited:
There is an outside chance with 4. However, just reading it and speaking as a defense attorney, I'd be willing to take a charge under 4 to trial. The state would have to prove that she had (within a documented time frame) actually aided in prostitution. Handing out condoms is not aiding in prostitution.



Matter of time? They've been doing it for years to gay teens. (With their parent's permission)

I, obviously, am not a lawyer.
My reasoning was that they could link number 4 to
3. Is in a public place, a place open to public view or in a motor vehicle on a public roadway and manifests an intent to commit or solicit an act of prostitution. Among the circumstances that may be considered in determining whether such an intent is manifested are: that the person repeatedly beckons to, stops or attempts to stop or engage passersby in conversation or repeatedly, stops or attempts to stop, motor vehicle operators by hailing, waiving of arms or any other bodily gesture; that the person inquires whether a potential patron, procurer or prostitute is a police officer or searches for articles that would identify a police officer; or that the person requests the touching or exposure of genitals or female breast;​

If she was advising people targeted by the police to take extra steps in their efforts to identify undercover police, then I suspect an overzealous prosecutor could at least get an indictment and might even find a judge who would not throw the whole thing out on the face of it. I see such actions as a gross miscarriage of justice, but parts of Arizona have already stepped through the Looking Glass.
 
Last edited:
What the ####? The state or the feds need to crack down on these lunatics. It's blatant kidnapping. :boggled:
 

Back
Top Bottom