Excellent news., Though I'm sure there'll be another round of nonsense from the anti-vax, religious and "Big Pharma" conspiracy nutters.A 9 valent vaccine is on the way.
http://www.mercknewsroom.com/news-r...tigational-9-valent-hpv-vaccine-v503-prevente
Excellent news., Though I'm sure there'll be another round of nonsense from the anti-vax, religious and "Big Pharma" conspiracy nutters.
I understand your point, but don't see how it needs to apply to the HPV vaccine. My pediatrician never mentioned "sex" or "sexually transmitted" when explaining the vaccine. He simply said it was a vaccine that can prevent a particular cancer. He mentioned that it is best to start the course between the ages of __ and __. He gave me a more detailed disclosure to sign but there was no reason for my kid to know it was a sexually transmitted disease. Of course, I told my kid all about it and why some people don't get it on the way home from the doctor, but that is just me. Not necessary to the child getting the vaccine.
I heard that HPV vaccines turns little girls into nymphomaniacs.
With the pneumococcal vaccine, as they suppressed the worst pathogenic strains, other pathogenic strains became more prevalent.I don't see that. There would have to be some advantage for the formerly harmless to become harmful to the host.
But I could see that the formerly harmless might randomly mutate into a more harmful strain that the vaccine wouldn't work on. But taking the vaccine wouldn't have any effect on that happening.
^If the type that causes cancer prevents other types from causing cancer, I still don't want it infecting me.
A 9 valent vaccine is on the way.
http://www.mercknewsroom.com/news-r...tigational-9-valent-hpv-vaccine-v503-prevente