Looking for Skeptics

[Orphia Nay]

Flaccon intends to tell us more in "short posts".

From what I know of her, she believes that if she thinks or says something, it becomes fact.

How can you reason with someone so self-absorbed and misguided? She's a lost cause; immune to reason.

Having said that, this thread's skeptical replies are such good reading, I don't want to miss a thing.

 

[Jack by the hedge]

I was lacerated in September. I did mention it

Yes, you said your skin ripped open independently. But you declined to explain what that meant. It sounds like something from a grand guignol gothic horror, but may equally well be one of those annoying little cuts where you didn't notice how you did it.

... and two weeks later I heard bits of "it" was found floating above the air in Chester.

Bits of "it" isn't very explanatory, is it?

You said you read something about "Alien life found above the skies over Chester". You didn't tell us where you read this article, nor what it was talking about and you certainly didn't give us any reason for why you might think it had any significance for you. You actually said "I'm not saying anything more than it certainly got me thinking".

(A quick Google finds this article in the Telegraph: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/...ng-in-Earths-atmosphere-claims-scientist.html ) which is about microscopic terrestrial life found high in the atmosphere. The researchers try the "maybe they drop in from space" gambit which tells us that they fully grasp how to make newspapers give them publicity. Is that what it got you thinking?

To ease confusion, I'd prefer to concentrate on just this past year.

To ease confusion, I'd prefer you to explain what you're talking about instead of make vague allusions to stuff and expect everyone to guess what you might mean.

 

[Pixel42]

To ease confusion, I'd prefer you to explain what you're talking about instead of make vague allusions to stuff and expect everyone to guess what you might mean.

Heartily seconded.

 

[Alice Shortcake]

Thirded!

 

[Donn]

Forted!

 

[Cassidy]

When she posted the YouTube clip that proved to contain the radio ad for Rock and Roll Heaven she claimed it contained the explanation of why she'd recently had her skin ripped open. She's claimed to have experienced physical symptoms which were caused by her spirits more than once.

I didn't say it contained an explanation to why I was lacerated at all.. I did homework on this radio ad. The end sentence still contains 5 syllables, and not the suggested 8 "A place where you don't have to die"

 

[Cassidy]

1. Oct 2012. A bunch of spirits attached themselves. I was assurred of "Best intentions" and co operated. I fled to a Bishop of their request. During this journey (at a friend's house) I was subjected to a long intake of breath. Within hours, blood had leaked from a scar and I threw the blouse in the bin. I was told to retrieve it. Actual words; "They'll be suspicious of voices" & "We've exerted proof" They claim it isn't my blood.

A witness has signed a statement to the above accounts, and awaits to be interviewed. Whilst it can't be anything but my blood, it deserves an investigation.

Whilst I don't find this paragraph confusing, some may do. Apologies in advance.

 

[Reno]

I was going to ask again just what the press and P.I team you keep going on about are doing currently, but it seems that the P.I team are visiting you tomorrow so I'll just have to hold my waters til then.

I do hope they come fully equipped with at least a dog, a van and devices.

 

[Biscuit]

It's just a radio ad. This has been shown beyond a shadow of a doubt.

 

[Biscuit]

1. Oct 2012. A bunch of spirits attached themselves. I was assurred of "Best intentions" and co operated. I fled to a Bishop of their request. During this journey (at a friend's house) I was subjected to a long intake of breath. Within hours, blood had leaked from a scar and I threw the blouse in the bin. I was told to retrieve it. Actual words; "They'll be suspicious of voices" & "We've exerted proof" They claim it isn't my blood.

A witness has signed a statement to the above accounts, and awaits to be interviewed. Whilst it can't be anything but my blood, it deserves an investigation.

Whilst I don't find this paragraph confusing, some may do. Apologies in advance.

I am mildly curious by what you mean by a "scar." You seem to have different definitions than is commonly used for quite a few words.

What was the injury that caused the scar?

When did the injury occur?

 

[pakeha]

1. Oct 2012. A bunch of spirits attached themselves. I was assurred of "Best intentions" and co operated. I fled to a Bishop of their request. During this journey (at a friend's house) I was subjected to a long intake of breath. Within hours, blood had leaked from a scar and I threw the blouse in the bin. I was told to retrieve it. Actual words; "They'll be suspicious of voices" & "We've exerted proof" They claim it isn't my blood.

A witness has signed a statement to the above accounts, and awaits to be interviewed. Whilst it can't be anything but my blood, it deserves an investigation.

Whilst I don't find this paragraph confusing, some may do. Apologies in advance.

No worries about confusion, flaccon.
These aren't easy subjects to write about at the best of times.
What has me confused is why you'd bin a blouse before having tried to remove the stains, unless it was a 'dry-clean only' garment.

 

[Cassidy]

I am mildly curious by what you mean by a "scar." You seem to have different definitions than is commonly used for quite a few words.

What was the injury that caused the scar?

When did the injury occur?

A scar left by an operation 30 years ago.

 

[Cassidy]

No worries about confusion, flaccon.
These aren't easy subjects to write about at the best of times.
What has me confused is why you'd bin a blouse before having tried to remove the stains, unless it was a 'dry-clean only' garment.

Had I been in my own home I would have soaked it off immediately. It was an embarrassment I quickly dealt with, and borrowed a t-shirt.

 

[Pixel42]

I didn't say it contained an explanation to why I was lacerated at all..

This is what you said:

As I was trawling youtube (by request) I got the answer as to why my skin ripped open independently a few weeks back. Please check over just a couple of clips "Damaged clouds: Are they real or fake" by "Skywitness" The background radio isn't what it seems, it's not a real advert ...

If you didn't mean that the clip contained "the answer as to why my skin ripped open independently" then what on earth did you mean?

I did homework on this radio ad. The end sentence still contains 5 syllables, and not the suggested 8 "A place where you don't have to die"

I can find no posts where anyone suggested that's what the man said. Here are the only posts I could find where posters say what they're hearing at this point in the ad:

"Rock and roll heaven. Where the tradition continues and the legends of rock and roll live on."
"That's right Casey! Rock and roll heaven. Where you don't have to die to... (knocking sound) ...laugh."

The second guy puts on a silly rough voice when saying something like "where you don't have to die to get there, baby" and then gives a devilish laugh.

Yeah, at 22 seconds the first voice says: "Rock and roll heaven, where the tradition continues and the legends of rock and roll live on." Then another voice: "That's right Casey, rock and roll heaven where you don't have to..." The next bit's obscured by tapping noises.

 

[Mojo]

Within hours, blood had leaked from a scar and I threw the blouse in the bin. I was told to retrieve it. Actual words; "They'll be suspicious of voices" & "We've exerted proof" They claim it isn't my blood.

This is a little confusing. Did they actually tell you to retrieve it, or did they just say "They'll be suspicious of voices" and "We've exerted proof"?

 

[Reno]

Hold on, hold on, hold on...I know this is a merry-go-round, but why on earth are we now discussing what happened on previous circuits? Can't we get back on and continue the journey from the present time? It's taken us 124 pages to get to this point and I don't want to have to get to page 248 to be right back to where we are now.

flaccon, we already lknow all of this stuff you are posting - you've posted it and we've all knocked it around for a while and we don't need to go back over old ground. Honestly, we're all smart enough here to know how to go back to any page and catch up if we need to.

Please just post NEW information, updates, or answer some of the many questions you have ignored so far. I'll start you off with one right now:

What are the press and the P.I team that you say are involved currently doing with your case right now?

Please be as precise and unambiguous and as non-confusing as possible. Just use plain words and sentences. Do you think you could do that?

 

[Cassidy]

This is what you said:


If you didn't mean that the clip contained "the answer as to why my skin ripped open independently" then what on earth did you mean?


I can find no posts where anyone suggested that's what the man said. Here are the only posts I could find where posters say what they're hearing at this point in the ad:

I feel it's fair to say it's part & parcel of that particular month yes. So ok, we're down to 6 syllables. We et' al still hear 5. The first syllable being "Please.." followed by 4 more syllables. It's a pity you didn't section the message to the Hare Krishna priest that was present here at the time. That clip didn't get a second mention because it was fast.

 

[tsig]

1. Oct 2012. A bunch of spirits attached themselves. I was assurred of "Best intentions" and co operated. I fled to a Bishop of their request. During this journey (at a friend's house) I was subjected to a long intake of breath. Within hours, blood had leaked from a scar and I threw the blouse in the bin. I was told to retrieve it. Actual words; "They'll be suspicious of voices" & "We've exerted proof" They claim it isn't my blood.

A witness has signed a statement to the above accounts, and awaits to be interviewed. Whilst it can't be anything but my blood, it deserves an investigation.

Whilst I don't find this paragraph confusing, some may do. Apologies in advance.

Last night an owl hooted. A car raced by andvanished. clouds over the moon and blood on the ground. Green visions clash obstinately on the purple sands drowning out all meaning while above the rat gulls circle ominously.


Whilst I don't find this paragraph confusing, some may do

 

[Pixel42]

I feel it's fair to say it's part & parcel of that particular month yes. So ok, we're down to 6 syllables. We et' al still hear 5. The first syllable being "Please.." followed by 4 more syllables. It's a pity you didn't section the message to the Hare Krishna priest that was present here at the time. That clip didn't get a second mention because it was fast.

This post makes no sense to me whatsoever.

 

[Cassidy]

Hold on, hold on, hold on...I know this is a merry-go-round, but why on earth are we now discussing what happened on previous circuits? Can't we get back on and continue the journey from the present time? It's taken us 124 pages to get to this point and I don't want to have to get to page 248 to be right back to where we are now.

flaccon, we already lknow all of this stuff you are posting - you've posted it and we've all knocked it around for a while and we don't need to go back over old ground. Honestly, we're all smart enough here to know how to go back to any page and catch up if we need to.

Please just post NEW information, updates, or answer some of the many questions you have ignored so far. I'll start you off with one right now:

What are the press and the P.I team that you say are involved currently doing with your case right now?

Please be as precise and unambiguous and as non-confusing as possible. Just use plain words and sentences. Do you think you could do that?

Sorry no, where's the point in going further unless it's understood. I'd really like to try and have these "moves" understood, without the re interpretations.