NRCC is proud of their idea to create fake Dem websites

[AlBell]

I find it somewhat encouraging that this deceptive practice is being defended by so few Republicans.

IMO Republicans need to become as honorless and crooked as their opponents.

No that doesn't equate to 'I Defend Those Websites'.

 

[NoahFence]

CRIPES! I had no idea that Facebook comments were even remotely authoritative! Jeepers. I'll tell you what, i will PERSONALLY! reimburse every single one of those people who lost money as the result of the Facebook Super Bowl Poster Debacle, as it means so much you.

Settle down.

You're being a great poster-child for the problems I'm talking about. You do realize that Facebook comments come from actual people, right?

Are you under the impression that the "Super Bowl Debacle" dishonesty is a singular event? The deceit shown in the website Debacle is just another symptom of the dishonesty we've come to know and love from you people.

 

[The Big Dog]

Settle down.

You're being a great poster-child for the problems I'm talking about. You do realize that Facebook comments come from actual people, right?

Are you under the impression that the "Super Bowl Debacle" dishonesty is a singular event? The deceit shown in the website Debacle is just another symptom of the dishonesty we've come to know and love from you people.

"You people"? Who you calling "You People"?

I already established that the insignificant FACEBOOK DEBACLE! was done by people different than the equally insignificant WEBSITE DEBACLE! i guess they all look alike to you, huh?

Here I was thinking that you loved American values. I guess I was wrong on that.

 

[Tricky]

IMO Republicans need to become as honorless and crooked as their opponents.

Those Democrats are so bad that they MADE us do this!

 

[DavidJames]

I already established that the insignificant FACEBOOK DEBACLE! was done by people different than the equally insignificant WEBSITE DEBACLE!

Who said they were the same people. They are all Republicans/Republican sympathizers. At some point avid readers will view the massive number of "insignificant" DEBACLE's, as systemic.

"You people"? Who you calling "You People"?

A healthy chunk of the Republican party.

 

[Brainster]

Who would have thought that Democrats would be so stupid as to not read a website before donating?

 

[BenBurch]

There is nothing beneath the Republicans these days. Nothing.

Yeah there is. A pile of steaming ****. They made it.

 

[NoahFence]

"You people"? Who you calling "You People"?

You people.

I already established that the insignificant FACEBOOK DEBACLE! was done by people different than the equally insignificant WEBSITE DEBACLE! i guess they all look alike to you, huh?

It's an alarming and real pattern. That you people don't want to acknowledge it doesn't change that. There's nothing insignificant about undermining our democracy.

Here I was thinking that you loved American values. I guess I was wrong on that.

I love human values. If this is your idea of American values, please leave and don't take my country down.

 

[DavidJames]

I find it somewhat encouraging that this deceptive practice is being defended by so few Republicans.

I guess if the thread lives long enough they'll all be here to defend this.

 

[elbe]

I'm reminded a bit of this from the Daily Show.

 

[332nd]

Who would have thought that Democrats would be so stupid as to not read a website before donating?

The same people who thought republicans were so stupid as to think that the US government funded the Super Bowl halftime show?

 

[SezMe]

Further, why I appear to be alone in this, I firmly believe that no one, democrat or not, are going to be mislead by a website that says "Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him" into thinking it is a pro John Lewis website.

Then answer my previous question: Why did the Elephants invest resources into these web sites if they aren't going to fool anybody?

 

[DavidJames]

Then answer my previous question: Why did the Elephants invest resources into these web sites if they aren't going to fool anybody?

He did, those wacky Republicans were just doing some satire

 

[Corsair 115]

I can't but help wonder if Corsair would be so poutraged by this if it was instead Republican candidates being satirized by web sites put up by the Democratic party

I have no dog in this fight—I'm not an American. I get to sit back and observe the political scene as it currently exists in the U.S.

In any case, my supposition still stands since you never actually answered it.

 

[Tricky]

He did, those wacky Republicans were just doing some satire

I didn't know they cared so much about the arts.

 

[BenBurch]

I didn't know they cared so much about the arts.

They seem to specialize in farce, it seems.

 

[The Big Dog]

I have no dog in this fight—I'm not an American. I get to sit back and observe the political scene as it currently exists in the U.S.

In any case, my supposition still stands since you never actually answered it.

That implies you did not ask the question in good faith.

I know you did not mean that.

Your supposition should be that I would act consistently, right?

 

[Corsair 115]

That implies you did not ask the question in good faith.

How on Earth did you arrive at that implication?

Your supposition should be that I would act consistently, right?

One would like to think so. But your posting history, as far as I have seen, would tend to indicate you would not act consistently. Hence my supposition. You are free to label it as wholly incorrect. Which, interestingly, you have not done but instead seem eager to remain vague and uncommitted.

 

[Foolmewunz]

Probably, because i am fairly certain that they don't think anyone is dumb enough to think that a site that says "Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him" is a pro John Lewis site.

Completely different, worlds different. Butterfly ballot? That was an inadequately designed mechanism that everyone had to use.

Here we have a voluntary decision to make a contribution, and that is only after you had navigated past a huge statement saying:

"Make a Contribution Today to Help Defeat John Lewis and candidates like him"
and filled out numerous details regarding your credit card.

I have an unshakeable faith in the American Public, I guess. Further, I have every confidence that if it was determined to have been done in error, that the recipients will return the money just like Hillary returned the $850,000 she got from scumball Mr. Norman Hsu after the Republicans drew it to her attention.

Truth will out, folks.

Why do you keep repeating the highlit part? There is no such statement on that page. Have you not read the page linked to, or do you just wish for it to say that, or are you hoping that people will read your contention and accept it because of your past record of honesty and even-handed treatment, or are you saying that the site IMPLIES those words?

Just in case you need to check, here's the link to the site, again.

http://johnlewis4congress.com/

 

[The Big Dog]

How on Earth did you arrive at that implication?

One would like to think so. But your posting history, as far as I have seen, would tend to indicate you would not act consistently. Hence my supposition. You are free to label it as wholly incorrect. Which, interestingly, you have not done but instead seem eager to remain vague and uncommitted.

Because you had arrived a "supposition" based on my "posting history."

You will have to forgive me if I ignore your bad faith hypothetical questions.