RoseMontague
Published Author
I think the better example is a railroad job from hell or perhaps a witch trial.
perhaps serving 10 years is better than hanging from a tree limb.
Um, not sure I can help here either.
Your post will have to stand as it's own answer.
J Harold C comrade - do you look at what you have typed before hitting submit.
Well, that I agree. But this has been going on for almost 7 years. What's 26 more among friends? You think we'll still be posting arguments about it then?
And Go Hawks!!! And hey, Bertha is moving, so things are looking up.
There is one thing worth bearing in mind: there is no trustworthy forensic evidence that puts either Knox or Sollecito in the room where the murder happened. The evidence on which they were convicted was an elaborate theory that Meredith Kercher was killed in as sex game that went wrong. At first there was mention of some sort of Satanic inspiration to this sex game, but that talk has long been abandoned by the prosecution.
We are no longer being asked to believe that Miss Knox is a witch, or that Sollecito was her dumb accomplice; but we are being asked to believe that Knox and Sollecito were the sort of people who had sex a quatre, where there is absolutely no hint of this in their previous histories. Indeed, it is quite incredible that Sollecito, who had known Knox but a week, and who has never met Guede, the other supposed participant, should ever have indulged in such perversion, given his personal history; nor is there any reason at all to suppose Knox would have found a four handed sex game at all alluring.
Knox and Sollecito are the innocent victims of the Italian love, nay, obsession with, conspiracy theories. There was no conspiracy. Meredith Kercher was killed by Rudy Guede, who is now serving 16 years for the crime.
-The "unrelenting stream of venom" is typical guilter projection. In reality, there has been an unrelenting stream of venom against the victims of wrongful prosecution and their families.
When John Douglas and I got into research on the case, we were struck by how different the media treatment was in Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States. It was as if they were describing three different cases. The reason, I think, is that they are pandering to already accepted beliefs – beliefs, not rationally considered conclusions – rather than presenting unvarnished facts.
And this phenomenon continues. To wit: an article last week by American Andrea Vogt in the British publication, The Week.
The article is entitled Amanda Knox’s fugitive fears: she’s right to be worried, and the entire tone suggests a condescending contempt for Amanda and her situation and an implication that even though she’s gotten away with murder, she might not this time. Even the term “fugitive fears” in the headline implies wrongdoing and guilt.
Playing the race card.... fortunately it did not work for Mignini, and the various prosecution efforts since have abandoned the idea.
Mark Olshaker, co-author with John Douglas, calls out yellow-journalist Andrea Vogt for her continued PR effort against two innocent people:
http://mindhuntersinc.com/pandering-to-existing-beliefs/
By Mark Olshaker On January 22, 2014
He's particularly hard on Vogt for her guilt-like assumptions. One of which is Vogt's claim that Knox ignored her own lawyer's advice and did not return to Italy for trial. Talk about factoids....
It won't be 26 more years regardless. They will get time served and the good behavior reductioins.
And no Bertha isn't moving:
SEATTLE (AP) - A Washington Transportation Department spokeswoman says the giant machine digging a highway tunnel under downtown Seattle has advanced two more feet, far enough to allow crews to build the next concrete ring of the tunnel.
Tuesday's progress was the first for the machine in nearly two months, since it stalled Dec. 6 some 60 feet underground.
Transportation spokeswoman Laura Newborn says workers for contractor Seattle Tunnel Partners are now "testing systems and evaluating the machine to see what maintenance might be needed before they resume tunneling."
But the Corte Suprema di Cassazione is a little like a senior citizen with memory issues. They will forget what they said in the last motivation. They forgot that the sex game theory had been dropped this time.
I didn't think the consultants stayed in the van but I am not certain of that.
The defense would not have to release the photo/s to the media. If the photos taken became part of the case file deposited in court by either side, is it possible that they were available to journalists who made inquiry to have copies of them? I don't know if that is what happened just putting it out there.
Daily Mail Niall Firth 1/16/08 said:"This is the grim, blood-soaked scene inside the Italian apartment where British student Meredith Kercher was sexually assaulted and brutally murdered.
In chilling new photographs released by Italian police today, the full scale of the horror that confronted police when they entered the apartment in Perugia becomes clear.
In one shocking image, pools of blood lie at the foot of a wardrobe on which photographs of Meredith and friends have been pinned.
The bathroom (left) and the corner of Meredith's bedroom are covered in blood
The images also show the apartment's bathroom sink and walls smeared with blood."
The original judge "...the Hon. Brian Hill, who is on public record saying that in his entire career he had never seen a single case where the evidence of guilt was so 'compelling', a statement which, based on the fact that the evidence was essentially non-existent, would seem to indicate a certain level of bias against the accused..." This statement proves that Massei is not the only judge in the world who is too thick to be presiding over serious criminal trials.
Mary methinks that PQ will be sending you a message about the FBI and KGB showing up unannounced. Mach will tell you that is mafia talk. Boy oh boy.
As you'll recall, the article specifically sourced the pictures to "Italian police."
Can you think of a reason why the Daily Mail would make a gross error and wrongly attribute the photos to police if they were not? Especially considering the possibility of sanction from those police and the prosecutor who did indeed file charges against journalists whose articles displeased him?
I did ask halides1 a while back if he was in favour of stiffer sentences for crimes of this kind in Italy and he (and others) were very gung ho - but apparently only for black convicts.
Can you think of a reason the same publication would release a totally false story the last time a verdict was issued?