Grinder
Penultimate Amazing
- Joined
- Aug 26, 2011
- Messages
- 10,033
I surrender!
Really I just miss Mary and think the above will bring her out.
I surrender!
I surrender!
That's OK. Someone pointed out to me that Williams College has a graduate program in Art History, which contradicts something I wrote upthread. However, I also echo acbytesla and LondonJohn who point out how unimportant the whole ranking issue is, etc.
So would you say John Follain is mistaken or his wording is incorrect when he writes that Meredith won a university grant (does not specify Erasmus) and writes she was studying both European politics and Italian while at Leeds and would continue studying the same while in Perugia?
The Ducks have a decent ranking in molecular biology. BTW so does Washington University in St. Louis. It is very dependent on which subject one examines.Easy to say for those that didn't go to a top 25 in the world school. No wonder you root for the ducks. They are rated between 201 - 300.
BCS schools should have to be in the top 100 US schools
The ranking for the ducks came from here
if I'd known you were a girl I'd never have corrected you.
Really I just miss Mary and think the above will bring her out.
The Ducks have a decent ranking in molecular biology. BTW so does Washington University in St. Louis. It is very dependent on which subject one examines.
This is rumour, so please treat it as such.... I am trying to find a cite for it....
One of the present Corte di Cassazione judges is Paolo Micheli, the judge who passed judgement on Rudy Guede's fast track. He also at the same time sent Raffaele and Amanda to trial when he was working at that level in the Italian system.
The rumour is that when Micheli was hearing the case brought by Mignini over the 21 people charged in the Narducci case, Micheli confided that he should never have sent Knox and Sollecito to trial.
If true, please remember the "if" part of this, it is rather stunning.
if I'd known you were a girl I'd never have corrected you.
Really I just miss Mary and think the above will bring her out.
Bill Williams said:This is rumour, so please treat it as such.... I am trying to find a cite for it....
One of the present Corte di Cassazione judges is Paolo Micheli, the judge who passed judgement on Rudy Guede's fast track. He also at the same time sent Raffaele and Amanda to trial when he was working at that level in the Italian system.
The rumour is that when Micheli was hearing the case brought by Mignini over the 21 people charged in the Narducci case, Micheli confided that he should never have sent Knox and Sollecito to trial.
If true, please remember the "if" part of this, it is rather stunning.
Confided to who? Or whom?
At some point Micheli probably realized that he would now have to write the Italian version of War and Peace (is it even a thousand pages long?) in motivating his decision against every single piece of Mignini nonsense in that Narducci case...a normal 90 day allowance took Micheli over a year to write so he must have gotten special dispensation of some sort. By then he must have understood that one certain prosecutor was "very special". Indeed!
Over the course of the four years I spent at Wabash, the football team lost 2 games and tied 1. The quarterback was a chemistry major, BTW. Brandeis I will give you.But not as high as the UW (the duckies) and I don't mean Wisconsin
And we have a better football team than Brandeis and Wabash combined
And who cares about WA U in St Louis even if they are a tiny bit higher than the UW?
What's up everyone!
I'll try to explain better by using Guede's own words from a couple of different sources, ok? Cool.
lol theory # 525 coming right up...
as I get it, Crini is ok with the earlier ToD!
Is it common for the prosecution to change their theorys and motives and interpretation of supposed evidence like this?
Im not a professional legal hound , so I really am asking seriously. It seems odd the prosecution has changed their storys and motives and dropped evidence like a cold turd, once it was proven to be wrong.
Why doesn't the prosecution just tell the Judge Nencini "look heres 525 guilter theories....one of them is probably maybe right...now convict them for life! ciao"
This is why I wanted to make sure this is marked as rumour. I, myself, trust the source of this, but this one needs a cite. I hope I've put the proper caveats on this so that you can vary your mileage as necessary.
Then again, to adopt a guilter method of proof, we could just say that it is iron-clad based on a rumour and an assertion....
I've been following this case for several years and somehow I've never heard about Rudys diary
Where did you find that? Is the full thing available to read?
Does he describe how Amanda & Raf joined in?
Thx!
I don't see any transcripts on Amanda;s site, maybe I'm overlooking them. Please provide a link. There are transcripts on IIP. Is that what you meant?
[/HILITE]
No, it's not what I meant. Here they are.
http://www.amandaknox.com/the-meredith-kercher-murder/
Are you sure you looked at this video?
There is no view of the cottage at all in her video. You must be looking at another video.
But he better than a security guard that's why he saw so much and was able to testify in those other cases. I think it was Comodi that made the argument that homelessness was an asset as he paid attention to his home, so to speak.
He clearly tells the court that they were there from the time he arrives until just before midnight. Every time he looks up they are there.
Rudy knelt by the victim. Rich.
If the kids did as you say they would have had blood all over them. It was a brutal, violent murder. Amanda wileding the knife, Raf holding her down while Rudy violated her. I don't know how Crini's fight over feces fits in.
You need to synchronize each of these elements to the minute and have everything work exactly as you wish for this theory to even start.
Was it Meredith's habit not to text or email in the evening?
They were in the plaza after 9:30 and done with the murder before 10:15?