• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

Re-Open the 9/11 Investigation Now

Plus, he was not guilty of committing two mutually exclusive crimes. Like both murder and attempted murder of the same victim.

Could he not try to shoot him, but miss on Saturday (Attempted) and on Sunday, catch him having spaghetti at luigi's and bash his head in(Murder) and be charged with both?
 
Forgive me for not reading the countless links.

Al Qaeda have connections all over the world, and especially through the Green Crescent.

What makes this a Saudi Government financing of 9/11, rather than an Al Qaeda financing of 9/11?

Because it's a effort by the DOS & FBI to cover up the direct involvment of mainstream Saudi orgs and individuals with direct ties into the Saudi royal family.

If these facts were revealed publicly at the time, the general public would have nade demands of the the USGOV that USGOV could not have complied with - there's no way the USGOV is going to turn it's back on the Kingdom.

Can you imagine POTUS going on TV and announcing military action against Saudi? If it was known that Saudi was as involved as the taliban, what choice would the gov.org have? War on both or no war? The Saudi connection had to covered up.
 
Quite timely, while the often-implicated Bandar "Bush" Bin Sultan Bin Saud is now more or less the last man standing in openly supporting the bizarrely vicious hordes that are assaulting Syria, Bob Graham has given an interview to "The Real News", a good hour in total. Four parts, I hope the playlist I created works (if not, look them up on the tube):


Graham, who received a pre-9/11 warning himself has done quite genuine work to shed some light on this, and I think his confusion is genuine as well, at least to a large extend. As he asks in closing, "what was the Saudi role and why did the US cover it up?"

The answer is, of course, that Bandar provided the legend our duhbunkie friends think is history, and knows more than enough about the people who assured that the operation worked to bring a good part of the US establishment down should anybody dare to touch him and in extension his fellow dark-age penguins.
 
Last edited:
Debra Burlingame - "I am asking all my Facebook friends to go the this website and sign the petition to pass the JASTA bill, which would allow 9/11 victims to sue the government of Saudi Arabia for its role in the 9/11 attacks. The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (where 15 of the 19 hijackers were from) funded and facilitated the attacks, even deploying Omar Bayoumi--a Saudi agent in San Diego--to assist two of the hijackers on my brother's plane. Please sign the petition and post this link on your FB page. Thank you."

http://www.justiceagainstterrorism.org/


You do know who Debra Burlingame is, right?

No. A real dingbat by the sound of that. Why can't she spell Deborah?
 
Last edited:
What is amusing is their inability to understand the difference between the Saudi Government being reponsible for 9/11,and individual Saudi Citizens being responsible for 9/11.

You'd think that would be easy to understand. It is amusing.
 
The answer is, of course, that Bandar provided the legend our duhbunkie friends think is history, and knows more than enough about the people who assured that the operation worked to bring a good part of the US establishment down should anybody dare to touch him and in extension his fellow dark-age penguins.

A charming fantasy.
 
... Graham, who received a pre-9/11 warning himself has done quite genuine work to shed some light on this, and I think his confusion is genuine as well, at least to a large extend. As he asks in closing, "what was the Saudi role and why did the US cover it up?"

...
Graham is selling books. A real hero, who after receiving the warning about 911, decided to keep it a secret for his book. What a great guy, he let 3,000 die. You did say he received a warning right? Or What? Is this like the CIT stuff?

Graham, who is selling books? What was the Saudi role? lol, 15 nuts were Saudi, but they would have been executed had the plan been exposed. Wait, Graham knew received the warning and did nothing. Wow, no wonder only a fringe few buy his book of woo.

Politics and money - Graham is both - selling books of woo to those who can't think for themselves. Don't waste your money, or time being fooled by Graham like some were fooled by CIT and their lies of the NoC.

from the op"
Re-Open the 9/11 Investigation Now
Bob Graham and Sharon Premoli, 09/11/2012"
How is that going?

The 19 terrorists must of got the 5 dollars for knives from someone. Do you think the someone knew the purpose? Gee, if the bought the planes, there would be some questions. But 19 nuts living like students/pilots, are what people do. People come to the US, and other nations to learn how to fly, and act like students. The source of the funding would look legit, and if the source knew the "goal", then they would be a possilbe leak for the CT.

What a load of junk. Old junk.


LOL, another book is being sold; when,,, oops, last year. Kind of late, late breaking news, late.

Kurt Eichenwald, a former New York Times reporter, wrote in an op-ed piece in Tuesday’s newspaper about a number of previously unknown warnings relayed to the White House by U.S. intelligence in the weeks and months prior to the attacks. Eichenwald
Op Ed? Wow.

Wow, what is behind this new (albeit one year late ...)
Eichenwald wrote of the warnings in his new book, “500 Days: Secrets and Lies in the Terror Wars.”
Oops,

Selling books - how did we miss this last year? Is the a 1 year delay?

I know we had warnings about terrorists attacks - they were not specific. oh man
 
Last edited:
Quite timely, while the often-implicated Bandar "Bush" Bin Sultan Bin Saud is now more or less the last man standing in openly supporting the bizarrely vicious hordes that are assaulting Syria, Bob Graham has given an interview to "The Real News", a good hour in total. Four parts, I hope the playlist I created works (if not, look them up on the tube):


Graham, who received a pre-9/11 warning himself has done quite genuine work to shed some light on this, and I think his confusion is genuine as well, at least to a large extend. As he asks in closing, "what was the Saudi role and why did the US cover it up?"

The answer is, of course, that Bandar provided the legend our duhbunkie friends think is history, and knows more than enough about the people who assured that the operation worked to bring a good part of the US establishment down should anybody dare to touch him and in extension his fellow dark-age penguins.

I'm "sure" he would have garnered some more attention, but for the fact that the truth movement is infested with first class conmen like CIT.

Say CE, it seem like Graham's theory is DIRECTLY inconsistent with you and your pals' no plane at the Pentagon nonsense.
 
Bwhahahaha! See no facts, hear no facts, speak no facts.

That post is the truth movement in a nutshell.

Fantastic!

Darn, you are on ignore. CE prefers the silly dumbed down side of the USA, and he adopts it as gospel.

We are on the ignore list. Oh Man


Those not on CE's special anti-CIT ignore list, don't quote us.

It is funny how people selling books make the news. And funnier this is a year old. Funnier still, CE posted an ignore list.

Who paid the 5 bucks for the 15 Saudis to have knives?
 
Last edited:
It seems that for certain regulars here it is more important to find anything to dismiss everything that goes contrary to the story they were fed than to even stop for a second and listen to what some people people like Graham think should be investigated did and do today. Admitting the own sickness is more difficult than admitting the one of state actors, for some reason. Some very obvious reason.
 
It seems that for certain regulars here it is more important to find anything to dismiss everything that goes contrary to the story they were fed than to even stop for a second and listen to what some people people like Graham think should be investigated did and do today. Admitting the own sickness is more difficult than admitting the one of state actors, for some reason. Some very obvious reason.

Ironic post, that.

Say, how many planes does Graham say hit the Pentagon?

How much money did it really take for AQ to pull 9/11?

The El Mariachi of terrorist attacks.
 
It seems that for certain regulars here it is more important to find anything to dismiss everything that goes contrary to the story they were fed than to even stop for a second and listen to what some people people like Graham think should be investigated did and do today. Admitting the own sickness is more difficult than admitting the one of state actors, for some reason. Some very obvious reason.
Do you make this up as you go, or did it come from CIT? Or RT?> RT is funny.

What story were we fed? Was it like the story you were fed by CIT.

I know we were warned about terrorists attacks before 911. Graham and last years news guy are selling books which are based on ideas which appeal to political biases. Some may find the books entertaining, but the hype is BS, called promotion. The big reason why the useless talk from Graham and this other guy from last year is not actionable.

Go ahead and make up lies we were fed stories. Which story is that?

You posted junk about a "capitalists" writing books. They will do almost anything to sell more books. If it takes meaningless dribble headlines which were manufactured due to a slow news day, so be it.
 
Last edited:
It seems that for certain regulars here it is more important to find anything to dismiss everything that goes contrary to the story they were fed than to even stop for a second and listen to what some people people like Graham think should be investigated did and do today. Admitting the own sickness is more difficult than admitting the one of state actors, for some reason. Some very obvious reason.

Yet you were bragging about putting people on ignore, including people who pointed out that your hero Graham completely contradicts your silly no plane theories.

We'll have the good taste to refrain pointing out that at the same time you were bragging about putting people on ignore, you also did not hesitate to characterize the very posts you claim to be ignoring. Peeking, sport?

Hee hee!
 
It seems that for certain regulars here it is more important to find anything to dismiss everything that goes contrary to the story they were fed than to even stop for a second and listen to what some people people like Graham think blah, blah, blah.

It's been 12 years. Found any evidence so far? :rolleyes:
 
Graham is selling books. A real hero, who after receiving the warning about 911, decided to keep it a secret for his book. What a great guy, he let 3,000 die. You did say he received a warning right? Or What? Is this like the CIT stuff?

Graham, who is selling books? What was the Saudi role? lol, 15 nuts were Saudi, but they would have been executed had the plan been exposed. Wait, Graham knew received the warning and did nothing. Wow, no wonder only a fringe few buy his book of woo.

Politics and money - Graham is both - selling books of woo to those who can't think for themselves. Don't waste your money, or time being fooled by Graham like some were fooled by CIT and their lies of the NoC.


How is that going?

The 19 terrorists must of got the 5 dollars for knives from someone. Do you think the someone knew the purpose? Gee, if the bought the planes, there would be some questions. But 19 nuts living like students/pilots, are what people do. People come to the US, and other nations to learn how to fly, and act like students. The source of the funding would look legit, and if the source knew the "goal", then they would be a possilbe leak for the CT.

What a load of junk. Old junk.


LOL, another book is being sold; when,,, oops, last year. Kind of late, late breaking news, late.


Op Ed? Wow.

Wow, what is behind this new (albeit one year late ...)

Oops,

Selling books - how did we miss this last year? Is the a 1 year delay?

I know we had warnings about terrorists attacks - they were not specific. oh man


Quoted for CE.

Now let's see if there's any rebuttal. That is, IF the cognitive dissonance doesn't get too strong
 

Back
Top Bottom