Gift us with December Stundie Nominations

[Travis]

Guidelines for what is a good Stundie nominee:

1) Posts must be funny.

2) Posts must exhibit ignorance, faulty logic or stupendous arrogance mixed with an ironic mistake.

3) No spelling errors, typos, grammar issues or math mix-ups unless they are deliciously ironic.

4) Posts should not just be something you disagree with.

5) All nominated posts must have some sort of link or screenshot to prove the reality of the post and its source.

6) Keep the introductions short and sweet as Stundies should not need too much background.

7) Nominated posts should be cut down to the nominated part which should be concise and stand on its own.

8) This is not the place for ad hominems so a post should be funny independent of knowing who it is that said it.

9) Pictures are not generally allowed on their own but descriptions of pictures, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed.

10) Videos are not allowed on their own but transcripts of videos, provided they meet all other previously stated requirements, are allowed even if you personally did the transcribing.

11) Please no more nominations about the Hallmark Channel-Burlesque conspiracy.

12) Please more pictures relating to the Hallmark Channel-Burlesque conspiracy.

 

[BrotherDesmond]

The obligatory "celebrity murdered by the Illuminati" post(in this case, Paul Walker):

When I read about this I immediately asked myself was this a new staged death and ritual sacrifice by Illuminati etc.

http://http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=262562

 

[Robrob]

Physical objects can't cause that kind of damage, you need an immaterial projected image...

How come explosives can penetrate the building but a honking huge plane traveling near bullet speeds can't? Do you have any idea how much energy the impacts would impart?

cause a plane is not designed to do that. Neither a missile would do what that plane did. You need a hologram.

 

[Bishop]

Almost every single one of the comments here would make a good Stundie:

http://commonsenseconspiracy.com/20...aul-walker-dies-in-car-accident-real-or-hoax/

Here are my favorites:

Brian from family guy died this week and now Brian from fast and furious dies. Also some sites reported him dead yesterday. Illuminati

It looks like illuminati. 11+30+6 (2013) = 11,
Numerology. 1+1=2, 3+o=3, 2+o+1+3=6
11+30+6= 11
2+3+6=11
Confirmed. Illuminati.

Paul Walker played Brian O’Conner in The Fast & The Furious. Brian O’Conner = 13 characters. ( Including the ‘ )
13 is one of the most important Illuminati numbers.
The accident occurred on 30-11-2013. 30 + 11 = 41. Paul Walker would have been 41 if he was not killed. 30 x 11 = 330. 33 is the most important Illuminati number.
30-11-2013 was on a Saterday. Saterday is a corruption of Satansday. Sater = Satan.
Saterday is the 6th day of the week. 6 is a satanic number. (666).
The accident occurred at 3.30 pm. 33 is the most important Illuminati number.
In numerology every character has a number ( as A=1 B=2 C=3 etc. )
Paul ; P = 16 A =1 U =21 L = 12. 16+1+21+12= 50. Walker = 6 characters. 50 ÷ 6 = 8.333333333. Nine threes. 9 x 3 = 27. In numerology 27 is the number of death.
8 x 9 = 72. 72 reversed is 27.
Paul Walker was murdered by the Illuminati. He was a human blood sacrifice.

 

[Tolls]

I love this bit:
50 ÷ 6 = 8.333333333

I get 8.333333333333334 which, going by their maths, is 3 * 14 + 4 = 46. Which I'm going to hazard a guess is an important Illuminati number? Because, well, it just is!

Or, if I only use a float, 8.333333...which gives me 3 * 6 = 18. Which..etc etc...ILLUMINATI!

 

[sylvan8798]

In numerology every character has a number ( as A=1 B=2 C=3 etc. )
Paul ; P = 16 A =1 U =21 L = 12. 16+1+21+12= 50. Walker = 6 characters. 50 ÷ 6 = 8.333333333. Nine threes. 9 x 3 = 27. In numerology 27 is the number of death.
8 x 9 = 72. 72 reversed is 27.

What the hell? How much crack do you have to smoke to come up with such stupid algorithms?

 

[Border Reiver]

What the hell? How much crack do you have to smoke to come up with such stupid algorithms?

More than is safe, less than a lethal dose.

Unless you/re Rob Ford.

 

[Horatius]

What the hell? How much crack do you have to smoke to come up with such stupid algorithms?

It's numerology, there's literally no rules at all. Any combination of calculations is permitted, so long at the result is one of those "important numbers" like 6, 666, 13, 33, 11, 7, 9, 911, or really any other number that has ever been associated with any "Event" they care to name. As has been pointed out many times before, with this "system", they can make any given number turn into any other number they want. Add the digits, subtract the digits, multiply, divide, count the number of digits, give numerical values to letters, whatever. So long as you get the Magical Numbers above, it's considered legitimate.

 

[Horatius]

Here's an example of how silly this is, using my above post as an example.


Well, it was posted at 01:11PM, So that's an 11 right there. But 01:11 is also 13:11 in 24-hour format, so that's 13 and 11. 1+3+1+1 = 5, 1311*5 = 6555, and it's obvious that 1:11+555 = 666.

It's post 8 in the thread, posted at 1:11, so 8+1=9 gives us 911. 9+1+1 = 11 again!

It was my 22,772th post, and of course 7+2=9, 7+2+2=11, so that's 911 again.

I was responding to sylvan8798, 98-87=11, again.

So this whole thread is an Illuminati Plot!

 

[Horatius]

And it took me 9 minutes to write that post! My God, maybe they're right!

 

[abaddon]

Almost every single one of the comments here would make a good Stundie:

http://commonsenseconspiracy.com/20...aul-walker-dies-in-car-accident-real-or-hoax/

Here are my favorites:

Brian from family guy died this week and now Brian from fast and furious dies. Also some sites reported him dead yesterday. Illuminati

It looks like illuminati. 11+30+6 (2013) = 11,
Numerology. 1+1=2, 3+o=3, 2+o+1+3=6
11+30+6= 11
2+3+6=11
Confirmed. Illuminati.

Paul Walker played Brian O’Conner in The Fast & The Furious. Brian O’Conner = 13 characters. ( Including the ‘ )
13 is one of the most important Illuminati numbers.
The accident occurred on 30-11-2013. 30 + 11 = 41. Paul Walker would have been 41 if he was not killed. 30 x 11 = 330. 33 is the most important Illuminati number.
30-11-2013 was on a Saterday. Saterday is a corruption of Satansday. Sater = Satan.
Saterday is the 6th day of the week. 6 is a satanic number. (666).
The accident occurred at 3.30 pm. 33 is the most important Illuminati number.
In numerology every character has a number ( as A=1 B=2 C=3 etc. )
Paul ; P = 16 A =1 U =21 L = 12. 16+1+21+12= 50. Walker = 6 characters. 50 ÷ 6 = 8.333333333. Nine threes. 9 x 3 = 27. In numerology 27 is the number of death.
8 x 9 = 72. 72 reversed is 27.
Paul Walker was murdered by the Illuminati. He was a human blood sacrifice.

Ooo, ooo, and HeroBrian has been removed from minecraft. It's a conspiracy I tells ya.

 

[Travis]

I'm still baffled as to what interest the Illuminati would have in Paul Walker. I mean should Chyler Leigh watch her step now too?

 

[sylvan8798]

CHYLER LEIGH = 3+8+25+12+5+18 =71 and 12+5+9+7+8=41 and 7+1+4+1=13, so obviously she is in severe and immediate danger and will likely be dispatched the next time they need a patsy. She can save herself by changing her name.

 

[BrotherDesmond]

The Family Guy episode with Brian's death aired on November 24, also the date of death of Lee Harvey Oswald, Freddie Mercury, and Barack Obama Sr. I think I've discovered an illuminati plot!

Hold on, there's someone knocking on my door....

 

[LSSBB]

The Family Guy episode with Brian's death aired on November 24, also the date of death of Lee Harvey Oswald, Freddie Mercury, and Barack Obama Sr. I think I've discovered an illuminati plot!

Hold on, there's someone knocking on my door....

"Do me a favor, open the door, and let 'em in"

- Paul (who is, as we all know, dead)

 

[MinimumWageShill]

Over on Cluesforum, Brianv has set a challenge.

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1632&start=420#p2387015

"Challenge:

If one of the vacuum rocket guys can build a working model of the rocket that pushes against itself

I will build one of the other type that uses propellant and gases that pushes against the earth and atmosphere"

Obviously he'll be able to prove that his 'other type' actually pushes against the Earth and the atmosphere.

 

[Horatius]

Over on Cluesforum, Brianv has set a challenge.

http://www.cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=23&t=1632&start=420#p2387015

"Challenge:

If one of the vacuum rocket guys can build a working model of the rocket that pushes against itself

I will build one of the other type that uses propellant and gases that pushes against the earth and atmosphere"

Obviously he'll be able to prove that his 'other type' actually pushes against the Earth and the atmosphere.

I think that one was nominated back in September. In fact, I started a thread asking about the other part of that post, about a gun being fired in zero G, and whether or not the action would cycle.


EDIT: the Sept. Stundie post:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=9472670#post9472670

 

[MinimumWageShill]

I think that one was nominated back in September. In fact, I started a thread asking about the other part of that post, about a gun being fired in zero G, and whether or not the action would cycle.


EDIT: the Sept. Stundie post:

http://www.internationalskeptics.com/forums/showthread.php?postid=9472670#post9472670

Sorry if that is the case, it is back up again dated today.

 

[Biscuit]

Jlapage is wee bit confused,

The burden of the proof is on the claimants (NASA, ESA,...). All we (doubters) have to do is point out the deficiencies in their purported pieces of evidence.

Saying everything NASA has done from Gemini to the ISS is a hoax isn't a claim! It's counter evidence!

clues forum

ETA: Oh snap I just went back one page on that thread and found this from the same poster,

Now why don't you see for yourself whether you can either substantiate the available 'evidence' provided by NASA and ESA or show why the logic and reasoning used by the various posters here at CF are somewhat weak or even contradictory and false? Remember that it is up to those making a claim or an assertion to prove said claim or assertion. The evidence they present must amount to a solid proof that people including posters at CF cannot somehow argue against.

Any argument against nullifies the evidence. That argument does not require evidence.

 

[Azrael 5]

Cluesforum a member responds to another with this beaut:

Maybe you ought to check those archives before posting your speculation on a site that prides itself with fact checking, sourced material and sound reasoning, eh?

Bottom of first post on thread!

http://cluesforum.info/viewtopic.php?f=27&p=2388515&sid=f4b3f02eb57f99665bfe0b8d3cddacfa#p2388515