• Quick note - the problem with Youtube videos not embedding on the forum appears to have been fixed, thanks to ZiprHead. If you do still see problems let me know.

9/11 No Planers who claim no planes struck the WTC, and think all the video is fake

Perhaps like AL, mikeys can wax fillosofik on the other things in the world he won't understand, like why is up?
 
dafydd said:
Snoop Dog wouldn't stoop to talk to you. You wouldn't get past his bodyguards. They are paid to deal with people like you.
Click to expand...


And those guys would probably know how much damage a small but very fast metal object can do to a much larger, relatively stationary object.
 
TheRedWorm said:
And those guys would probably know how much damage a small but very fast metal object can do to a much larger, relatively stationary object.
Click to expand...

The object was not small and the stationary object was not skin deep. You will not find a favourable comparison for your case.
 
Mikeys said:
The object was not small and the stationary object was not skin deep. You will not find a favourable comparison for your case.
Click to expand...




.........what? Are you saying........ You know what, I'm not even going to guess, please tell me what point you are trying to make.
 
LSSBB said:
Why do you think that the size difference matters?
Click to expand...

A larger objects will be more resistant during collision. It's not the major point here. The towers were not solids. You could shoot a bullet through them if it went through windows.
 
jaydeehess said:
,,,,, and wrt an aircraft hitting it this means what , in your mind?
Click to expand...

I thought we have already established with your excellent explanation yesterday how the momentum transfer works and that a plane can't go through this
steel_structure_warehouse_steel_warehouses_barn_garage.jpg

top it with concrete
It would get shredded or shredded whatever left from the impact I would guess on the wall.
 
Last edited:
Mikeys said:
I thought we have already established with your excellent explanation yesterday how the momentum transfer works and that a plane can't go through this [qimg]http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/857872132/steel_structure_warehouse_steel_warehouses_barn_garage.jpg[/qimg]
top it with concrete
It would get shredded or shredded whatever left from the impact I would guess on the wall.
Click to expand...

A truck took something stronger than that out and almost took down a bridge. Trucks are not even as fast as planes. I bet you can't figure out how it could be.

Be the way. Why do you want to make "truthers" look bad? Giggles?
 
Mikeys said:
I thought we have already established with your excellent explanation yesterday how the momentum transfer works and that a plane can't go through this [qimg]http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/857872132/steel_structure_warehouse_steel_warehouses_barn_garage.jpg[/qimg]
top it with concrete
It would get shredded or shredded whatever left from the impact I would guess on the wall.
Click to expand...



Are you saying that the plane would not enter the building completely in undamaged? Because if you are, well, then what's the problem? As the plane ripped through the building, it was shredded.
 
DGM said:
A truck took something stronger than that out and almost took down a bridge. Trucks are not even as fast as planes. I bet you can't figure out how it could be.

Be the way. Why do you want to make "truthers" look bad? Giggles?
Click to expand...

If the truck was bigger etc...faster, it would take down the bridge, so what?
 
Last edited:
Mikeys said:
I thought we have already established with your excellent explanation yesterday how the momentum transfer works and that a plane can't go through this [qimg]http://i00.i.aliimg.com/photo/v0/857872132/steel_structure_warehouse_steel_warehouses_barn_garage.jpg[/qimg]
top it with concrete
It would get shredded or shredded whatever left from the impact I would guess on the wall.
Click to expand...

You can't explain it then can you? Take it from the top, a 500 mph aircraft hits that, what, exactly, don't be afraid to use your keyboard,, happens?
 
Mikeys said:
F4 Phantom Jet Hits Concrete Wall at 500 MPH
Click to expand...

Yes, and this relates to an aircraft hitting a steel framed wall, how?
I certainly never expect the F4 to enter the concrete block. However the floor pans of the WTC were only 4 inches thick. It matters not that they were 100 feet between perimeter and core except to say that it not likely to be destroyed for that entire depth.
Still awaiting an explanation that makes a modicum of sense using known physics
 
twinstead said:
Well there you have it. The WTC construction was exactly like a 6 foot thick reinforced concrete wall. I bow to your superior knowledge of how things are built. :boggled:
Click to expand...

The depth of the WTC was a hell more than that. What could get inside could only go through the windows and dissipate along the path of little resistance, that is air. Some damage at the impact but a cut out in the shape of a plane is a Hollywood trademark.
 
Hmm, I have seen 8 inch thick 40 foot tall trees destroyed by a water bomber. But, but , but the tree is 40 feet deep in the direction the water is traveling, this must be impossible
 
Mikeys said:
The depth of the WTC was a hell more than that. What could get inside could only go through the windows and dissipate along the path of little resistance, that is air. Some damage at the impact but a cut out in the shape of a plane is a Hollywood trademark.
Click to expand...

I reiterate, no one can honestly believe something as stupid as that!
Troll is as troll does.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Back
Top Bottom